This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 06/23/2019 at 00:00:26 (UTC).

TYLER WESTBROOK VS CHRISTINE KOHLER EKSTRAND, M.D.

Case Summary

On 11/08/2017 TYLER WESTBROOK filed a Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice lawsuit against CHRISTINE KOHLER EKSTRAND, M D. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is JON R. TAKASUGI. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****2785

  • Filing Date:

    11/08/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

JON R. TAKASUGI

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

WESTBROOK TYLER

Defendants and Respondents

EKSTRAND CHRISTINE KOHLER M.D.

DOES 1 TO 10

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney

LUCERO LINDA ESQ.

Defendant and Respondent Attorney

LAMB MICHAEL V. ESQ.

 

Court Documents

DECLARATION OF DILIGENCE

11/21/2017: DECLARATION OF DILIGENCE

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

11/21/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

11/21/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

Unknown

11/8/2017: Unknown

COMPLAINT FOR: PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE BY A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER

11/8/2017: COMPLAINT FOR: PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE BY A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER

SUMMONS

11/8/2017: SUMMONS

 

Docket Entries

  • 05/14/2019
  • at 1:30 PM in Department 3, Jon R. Takasugi, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment - Not Held - Rescheduled by Party

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/08/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 3, Jon R. Takasugi, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/07/2019
  • Separate Statement; Filed by Christine Kohler M.D. Ekstrand (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/07/2019
  • Motion for Summary Judgment; Filed by Christine Kohler M.D. Ekstrand (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/24/2019
  • at 10:00 AM in Department 3, Jon R. Takasugi, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/21/2019
  • Notice (Of Order Re Stipulation to Continue Trial); Filed by Christine Kohler M.D. Ekstrand (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/11/2019
  • Stipulation and Order (To Continue Trial); Filed by Christine Kohler M.D. Ekstrand (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/20/2018
  • NOTICE OF RULING ON MOTIONS OF DEFENDANT CHRISTINE A. KOHLEREKSTRAND. M.D. TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS 1) RESPONSES TO DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET NO. ONE. WITHOUT OBJECTION AND 2) ANSWERS, WITHOUT OBJECTION, TO FORM AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORES, SETS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/20/2018
  • Notice of Ruling; Filed by Christine Kohler M.D. Ekstrand (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/15/2018
  • at 1:30 PM in Department 3; Unknown Event Type - Held - Motion Granted

    Read MoreRead Less
10 More Docket Entries
  • 11/21/2017
  • DECLARATION OF DILIGENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/21/2017
  • PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/21/2017
  • Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint); Filed by Tyler Westbrook (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/21/2017
  • Declaration re: Due Diligence; Filed by Tyler Westbrook (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/21/2017
  • Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Tyler Westbrook (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/21/2017
  • PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/08/2017
  • ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/08/2017
  • SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/08/2017
  • COMPLAINT FOR: PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE BY A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/08/2017
  • Complaint; Filed by Tyler Westbrook (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC682785    Hearing Date: October 25, 2019    Dept: 3

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

TYLER WESTBROOK,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

CHRISTINE KOHLER EKSTRAND, M.D., ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: BC682785

[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Dept. 3

1:30 p.m.

October 25, 2019

1. Background Facts

Plaintiff, Tyler Westbrook filed this action against Defendant, Christine Kohler Ekstrand, M.D. for damages arising out of medical malpractice. 

2. Motion for Summary Judgment

a. Moving Argument

At this time, Defendant moves for summary judgment, contending she complied with the standard of care at all times, and nothing she did caused or contributed to Plaintiff’s claimed damages. 

b. Prior Hearing

The Court was originally scheduled to hear this motion on 7/26/19.  At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court determined Defendant met her moving burden to show she was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  The Court continued the hearing on the motion to permit Plaintiff to present evidence in support of his theory, posited for the first time at the hearing on 7/26/19, that he was mentally incompetent to understand the informed consent documents he signed. 

c. Analysis

Any supplemental opposition to the motion was due on or before 10/11/19.  The Court did not receive a timely supplemental opposition to the motion.  Indeed, on 10/18/19, Defendant filed a supplemental reply wherein she correctly notes that Plaintiff has not filed supplemental opposition to the motion. 

Prior to 10/21/19, the Court prepared a tentative ruling granting the motion for summary judgment due to the lack of supplemental opposition.  On 10/21/19, Plaintiff submitted an untimely supplemental opposition to the motion.  To the extent the Court has considered the supplemental opposition, the Court finds it does not raise triable issues of material fact.  Plaintiff purports to provide the “Declaration of Sar Ahmed, M.D. and Karl Epstein, M.D.” with the opposition (see proof of service of opposition papers, dated 10/18/19).  There is no declaration of Ahmed or Epstein with the opposition.  There is a letter from Ahmed to Plaintiff’s attorney, but it is not signed under penalty of perjury.  There is nothing from Epstein with the opposition papers.  Defendant’s objections, filed on 10/22/19, are sustained.

The opposition also argues that, to the extent the Court is inclined to grant the motion, the Court should continue the hearing on the motion.  Continuances of summary judgment motions are governed by CCP §437c(h).  A threshold requirement for a continuance is a declaration from an attorney setting forth grounds for the requested continuance.  There is no declaration of Plaintiff’s attorney in support of the request for a continuance, and it is denied.

As a final note, Plaintiff submitted a new separate statement with the opposition.  In the Court’s original tentative ruling concerning this matter, dated 7/26/19, the Court indicated, “Plaintiff’s separate statement in opposition to the motion fails to comply with CRC 3.1350(h).  Plaintiff failed to state the facts in her separate statement, which rendered review of the statement virtually impossible.”  Despite this prior admonishment, Plaintiff provided a substantially identical separate statement with the supplemental papers.  The separate statement remains impossible to review and does not provide the Court with meaningful guidance. 

The Court previously found Defendant met her moving burden to show she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  The Court permitted Plaintiff to submit additional papers to raise a triable issue of material fact.  Plaintiff failed to file any timely papers.  Plaintiff’s untimely papers fail to include any admissible evidence, either to raise a triable issue of material fact or to support a request for a continuance.  Additionally, Plaintiff’s separate statement remains fatally defective.  The motion for summary judgment is therefore granted at this time.  Defendant is ordered to give notice.

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at sscdept3@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.  If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.  If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative.