Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 06/07/2019 at 12:09:56 (UTC).

TRACY MCGLORY VS ALEXANDER STEVEN HOYT ET AL

Case Summary

On 06/28/2017 TRACY MCGLORY filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against ALEXANDER STEVEN HOYT. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are LAURA A. SEIGLE and AMY D. HOGUE. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****6746

  • Filing Date:

    06/28/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

LAURA A. SEIGLE

AMY D. HOGUE

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

MCGLORY TRACY

Defendants and Respondents

HOYT STEVE

DOES 1 TO 20

HOYT ALEXANDER STEVEN

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney

GLADKOV SERGEI N. ESQ

 

Court Documents

Minute Order

12/12/2018: Minute Order

Proof of Personal Service

12/26/2018: Proof of Personal Service

Proof of Personal Service

12/26/2018: Proof of Personal Service

Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

12/26/2018: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

Minute Order

12/28/2018: Minute Order

Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

1/15/2019: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

Minute Order

2/26/2019: Minute Order

Motion re:

4/26/2019: Motion re:

Motion re:

5/14/2019: Motion re:

Notice

6/3/2019: Notice

Notice of Ruling

6/4/2019: Notice of Ruling

Minute Order

6/4/2019: Minute Order

SUMMONS

6/28/2017: SUMMONS

COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)

6/28/2017: COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)

2 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/04/2019
  • at 1:30 PM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default and Default Judgment (CCP 473.5) - Held - Continued

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/04/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Hearing on Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default and Default Jud...)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/04/2019
  • Notice of Ruling; Filed by Alexander Steven Hoyt (Defendant); Steve Hoyt (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/03/2019
  • Notice (NOTICE OF NON OPPOSITION); Filed by Alexander Steven Hoyt (Defendant); Steve Hoyt (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/14/2019
  • Motion re: (NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION); Filed by Alexander Steven Hoyt (Defendant); Steve Hoyt (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/26/2019
  • Motion re: (NOTICE OF MOTION AND DEFENDANT STEVE HOYT'S MOTION TO VACATE); Filed by Alexander Steven Hoyt (Defendant); Steve Hoyt (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/26/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: (Why This Action Shuld Not Be Dismissed for Failure of Plaintiff to Enter Default Judgment as to Defendants Alexander Steven Hoyt and Steve Hoyt Pursuant to California Rules of Court Section 3.110(h)) - Held - Continued

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/26/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Order to Show Cause Re: Why This Action Shuld Not Be Dismisse...)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/15/2019
  • Request for Entry of Default / Judgment; Filed by Tracy McGlory (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/28/2018
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 7, Amy D. Hogue, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/28/2018
  • Minute Order ((Jury Trial)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/26/2018
  • Proof of Personal Service; Filed by Tracy McGlory (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/26/2018
  • Proof of Personal Service; Filed by Tracy McGlory (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/26/2018
  • Request for Entry of Default / Judgment; Filed by Tracy McGlory (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/12/2018
  • at 10:00 AM in Department 7, Amy D. Hogue, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Court

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/12/2018
  • Minute Order ((Final Status Conference)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/28/2017
  • Complaint; Filed by Tracy McGlory (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/28/2017
  • SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/28/2017
  • COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC666746    Hearing Date: September 24, 2020    Dept: 27

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

TRACY MCGLORY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ALEXANDER STEVEN HOYT, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) )

BC666746

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT ‘S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY AND MONETARY SANCTIONS

Dept. 27

1:30 p.m.

September 24, 2020

On June 28, 2017, plaintiff Tracy McGlory (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendant Steve Hoyt (sued as “Alexander Steven Hoyt”) (“Defendant”) arising from a June 28, 2015 motor vehicle accidentOn January 31, 2020, Defendant served Demand for Inspection and Production of Documents, Set No. One, Form Interrogatories, Set No. One, and Special Interrogatories, Set No. One.  On March 31, 2020, defense counsel wrote to Plaintiff’s counsel to meet and confer.  Plaintiff has not responded to the meet and confer or provided responses.  

Where a party fails to serve timely responses to discovery requests, the court may make an order compelling responses.  (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, 2031.300; Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 403.)   A party that fails to serve timely responses waives any objections to the request, including ones based on privilege or the protection of attorney work product.  (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (a), 2031.300, subd. (a).)  Unlike a motion to compel further responses, a motion to compel responses is not subject to a 45-day time limit and the propounding party has no meet and confer obligations.  (Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc., supra, 148 Cal.App.4th at p. 404.)

Plaintiff did not oppose this Motion and it is undisputed that Plaintiff did not serve responses.  Defendant’s Motions are GRANTED.  Plaintiff is ordered to provide verified responses, without objections, to Defendant’s Demand for Inspection and Production of Documents, Set No. One, Form Interrogatories, Set No. One, and Special Interrogatories, Set No. One within 20 days of this Order.  

Where the court grants a motion to compel responses, sanctions shall be imposed against the party who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel, unless the party acted with substantial justification or the sanction would otherwise be unjust.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (c), 2031.300, subd. (c).)  

Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED and imposed against Plaintiff in the reduced amount of $930 for one hours at defense counsel’s hourly rate of $250 and $180 in filing fees, to be paid within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order.

Moving party to give notice.

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.  

Dated this 24th day of September 2020

Hon. Edward B. Moreton, Jr. 

Judge of the Superior Court

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer GLADKOV SERGEI N. ESQ