This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 10/28/2020 at 08:30:47 (UTC).

TEA SOO JUN VS DAI SOOK YOO ET AL

Case Summary

On 09/28/2017 TEA SOO JUN filed a Personal Injury - Uninsured Motor Vehicle lawsuit against DAI SOOK YOO. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****7603

  • Filing Date:

    09/28/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Uninsured Motor Vehicle

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs and Petitioners

JUN TEA SOO

YOO DAI

Defendants and Respondents

PARK SHIN KWANG

DOES 1 TO 25

YOO DAI SOOK

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. YE APLC

YOO KENNETH KEEBYUNG

BAYONA EBER

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

NETTELS CHARLES F. ESQ.

CAPRA-CUNNINGHAM MARISA ESQ.

FARMER JOHN T.

CAPRA-CUNNINGHAM MARISA MILLIKEN

NETTELS CHARLES F.

CAPRA-CUNNINGHAM MARISA

NETTLES CHARLES F

 

Court Documents

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE)

6/29/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE)

Declaration - DECLARATION DECLARATION OF JACQUELINE A. KALLBERG IN SUPPPORT OF DEFENDANT-CROSS-DEFENDANT KWANG SHIN PARK'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF CROSS-COMPLAINANT DAI SOOK YOO'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEP

11/7/2019: Declaration - DECLARATION DECLARATION OF JACQUELINE A. KALLBERG IN SUPPPORT OF DEFENDANT-CROSS-DEFENDANT KWANG SHIN PARK'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF CROSS-COMPLAINANT DAI SOOK YOO'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEP

Motion to Compel - MOTION TO COMPEL MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL CROSS-DEFENDANT SHIN KWANG PARK TO ATTEND AND TESTIFY AT DEPOSITION

10/23/2019: Motion to Compel - MOTION TO COMPEL MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL CROSS-DEFENDANT SHIN KWANG PARK TO ATTEND AND TESTIFY AT DEPOSITION

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL)

10/10/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL)

Notice of Ruling

5/28/2019: Notice of Ruling

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED CASES ...)

5/23/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED CASES ...)

Declaration in Support of Ex Parte Application

5/22/2019: Declaration in Support of Ex Parte Application

Notice of Ruling - NOTICE OF RULING REGARING RELATED CASES

5/2/2019: Notice of Ruling - NOTICE OF RULING REGARING RELATED CASES

Minute Order - Minute Order (Court Order re: related cases)

12/11/2018: Minute Order - Minute Order (Court Order re: related cases)

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS -

2/14/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS -

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT KWANG SIN PARK;DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

3/27/2018: ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT KWANG SIN PARK;DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

CIVIL DEPOSIT

4/2/2018: CIVIL DEPOSIT

SUMMONS -

4/3/2018: SUMMONS -

NOTICE OF POSTING JURY FEES

4/3/2018: NOTICE OF POSTING JURY FEES

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE

6/13/2018: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE

SUMMONS CROSS-COMPLAINT

11/13/2017: SUMMONS CROSS-COMPLAINT

CROSS-COMPLAINT-PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH

11/13/2017: CROSS-COMPLAINT-PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH

COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES) -

9/28/2017: COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES) -

31 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 05/13/2021
  • Hearing05/13/2021 at 08:30 AM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/29/2021
  • Hearing04/29/2021 at 10:00 AM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status Conference

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/28/2020
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; (OSC RE Dismissal) - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2020
  • Docketat 10:30 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Trial Setting Conference - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2020
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Trial Setting Conference)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/03/2020
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/21/2020
  • DocketAssociation of Attorney; Filed by Dai Sook Yoo (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/18/2020
  • Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/14/2020
  • Docketat 1:54 PM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Court Order

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/14/2020
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Court Order re: May 18, 2020)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
58 More Docket Entries
  • 02/14/2018
  • DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Tea Soo Jun (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/13/2017
  • DocketDEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/13/2017
  • DocketSUMMONS CROSS-COMPLAINT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/13/2017
  • DocketDemand for Jury Trial; Filed by Dai Sook Yoo (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/13/2017
  • DocketCROSS-COMPLAINT-PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/13/2017
  • DocketANSWER PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/12/2017
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by Dai Yoo (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/28/2017
  • DocketSUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/28/2017
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by Tea Soo Jun (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/28/2017
  • DocketCOMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC677603    Hearing Date: November 21, 2019    Dept: 5

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 5

tea soo Jun,

Plaintiff,

v.

dai sook yoo, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: BC677603, consolidated with

17STLC02937

Hearing Date: November 21, 2019

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

motion to compel deposition

BACKGROUND

Cross-Complainant Dai Sook Yoo (“Yoo”) moves to compel the deposition of Cross-Defendant Shin Kwang Park (“Park”). Park opposes the motion, which is granted.

LEGAL STANDARD

Per Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.450, if a party to the action fails to appear for deposition after service of a deposition notice and the party has not served a valid objection to that deposition notice, the party that noticed the deposition may move for an order to compel the deponent to attend and testify at deposition. (Code Civ. Proc., §2025.450, subd. (a).)

DISCUSSION

Yoo has the right to take Park’s deposition without leave of court at any time after Park appeared in the action. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.210, subd. (a).) Yoo noticed Park’s deposition for February 26, 2019, April 5, 2019, and September 27, 2019. Park has not sat for deposition, as Park has claimed unavailability for all these dates. (See Declaration of Amelia McDonald, ¶¶ 3-13.) Yoo has therefore demonstrated that Park has failed to appear for deposition.

In opposition, Park argues that he properly objected to Yoo’s deposition notice on the basis that Park was unavailable on the noticed date. A party may object to a deposition notice based on an “error or irregularity” in the deposition notice. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.410, subd. (a).) Yoo’s unavailability is not an error or irregularity in the deposition notice. Moreover, Yoo afforded Park three opportunities to appear, and each time Park claimed to be unavailable, which suggests that Park is not acting in good faith. Accordingly, Park’s objections were not proper. Park must appear for deposition.

Park also argues that his unavailability “is an issue to be worked out between the parties and does not require court intervention.” (Opposition, at p. 4.) Yoo has noticed Park’s deposition for multiple dates, and Park has yet to identify a date certain on which he will appear for deposition. Court intervention is therefore warranted.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Yoo’s motion to compel Park’s deposition is granted. Park shall appear for a deposition within thirty (30) days of notice of this order, unless Yoo stipulates to extend the deadline. Yoo shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: November 21, 2019 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court