On 09/28/2017 TEA SOO JUN filed a Personal Injury - Uninsured Motor Vehicle lawsuit against DAI SOOK YOO. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH and MICHAEL E. WHITAKER. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH
MICHAEL E. WHITAKER
JUN TEA SOO
PARK SHIN KWANG
DOES 1 TO 25
YOO DAI SOOK
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. YE APLC
YOO KENNETH KEEBYUNG
NETTELS CHARLES F. ESQ.
CAPRA-CUNNINGHAM MARISA ESQ.
FARMER JOHN T.
CAPRA-CUNNINGHAM MARISA MILLIKEN
NETTELS CHARLES F.
NETTLES CHARLES F
MAYERS DARREN GREGORY
MAYERS DARREN G.
5/20/2021: Notice - NOTICE NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL (SETTLEMENT)
5/13/2021: Notice of Settlement
1/19/2021: Notice - NOTICE NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL
2/3/2021: Association of Attorney
2/17/2021: Ex Parte Application - EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND ALL RELATED DATES PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
6/29/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE)
11/7/2019: Declaration - DECLARATION DECLARATION OF JACQUELINE A. KALLBERG IN SUPPPORT OF DEFENDANT-CROSS-DEFENDANT KWANG SHIN PARK'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF CROSS-COMPLAINANT DAI SOOK YOO'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEP
10/23/2019: Motion to Compel - MOTION TO COMPEL MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL CROSS-DEFENDANT SHIN KWANG PARK TO ATTEND AND TESTIFY AT DEPOSITION
10/10/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL)
5/28/2019: Notice of Ruling
12/11/2018: Minute Order - Minute Order (Court Order re: related cases)
2/14/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS -
3/27/2018: ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT KWANG SIN PARK;DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
4/2/2018: CIVIL DEPOSIT
4/3/2018: SUMMONS -
6/13/2018: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
11/13/2017: SUMMONS CROSS-COMPLAINT
11/13/2017: CROSS-COMPLAINT-PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH
Hearing07/07/2021 at 08:30 AM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (Settlement)Read MoreRead Less
DocketNotice (Notice of Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal (Settlement)); Filed by Tea Soo Jun (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 32, Michael E. Whitaker, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Party's MotionRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 1:44 PM in Department 32, Michael E. Whitaker, Presiding; Court OrderRead MoreRead Less
DocketNotice of Settlement; Filed by Tea Soo Jun (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketMinute Order ( (Court Order re: notice of settlement)); Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
DocketCertificate of Mailing for ((Court Order re: notice of settlement) of 05/13/2021); Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 32, Michael E. Whitaker, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Party's MotionRead MoreRead Less
DocketNotice of Ruling (on Ex parte Application to Continue Trial and All Related Dates Pursuant to Stipulation of the Parties); Filed by Dai Sook Yoo (Defendant)Read MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 32, Michael E. Whitaker, Presiding; Hearing on Ex Parte Application (to Continue Trial and All Related Dates Pursuant to Stipulation) - Held - Motion GrantedRead MoreRead Less
DocketSUMMONS CROSS-COMPLAINTRead MoreRead Less
DocketDemand for Jury Trial; Filed by Dai Sook Yoo (Defendant)Read MoreRead Less
DocketCROSS-COMPLAINT-PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATHRead MoreRead Less
DocketDEMAND FOR JURY TRIALRead MoreRead Less
DocketAnswer; Filed by Dai Sook Yoo (Defendant)Read MoreRead Less
DocketANSWER PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATHRead MoreRead Less
DocketComplaint; Filed by Dai Yoo (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketSUMMONSRead MoreRead Less
DocketCOMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)Read MoreRead Less
DocketComplaint; Filed by Tea Soo Jun (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
Case Number: BC677603 Hearing Date: November 21, 2019 Dept: 5
tea soo Jun,
dai sook yoo, et al.,
Case No.: BC677603, consolidated with
Hearing Date: November 21, 2019
[TENTATIVE] order RE:
motion to compel deposition
Cross-Complainant Dai Sook Yoo (“Yoo”) moves to compel the deposition of Cross-Defendant Shin Kwang Park (“Park”). Park opposes the motion, which is granted.
Per Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.450, if a party to the action fails to appear for deposition after service of a deposition notice and the party has not served a valid objection to that deposition notice, the party that noticed the deposition may move for an order to compel the deponent to attend and testify at deposition. (Code Civ. Proc., §2025.450, subd. (a).)
Yoo has the right to take Park’s deposition without leave of court at any time after Park appeared in the action. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.210, subd. (a).) Yoo noticed Park’s deposition for February 26, 2019, April 5, 2019, and September 27, 2019. Park has not sat for deposition, as Park has claimed unavailability for all these dates. (See Declaration of Amelia McDonald, ¶¶ 3-13.) Yoo has therefore demonstrated that Park has failed to appear for deposition.
In opposition, Park argues that he properly objected to Yoo’s deposition notice on the basis that Park was unavailable on the noticed date. A party may object to a deposition notice based on an “error or irregularity” in the deposition notice. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.410, subd. (a).) Yoo’s unavailability is not an error or irregularity in the deposition notice. Moreover, Yoo afforded Park three opportunities to appear, and each time Park claimed to be unavailable, which suggests that Park is not acting in good faith. Accordingly, Park’s objections were not proper. Park must appear for deposition.
Park also argues that his unavailability “is an issue to be worked out between the parties and does not require court intervention.” (Opposition, at p. 4.) Yoo has noticed Park’s deposition for multiple dates, and Park has yet to identify a date certain on which he will appear for deposition. Court intervention is therefore warranted.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
Yoo’s motion to compel Park’s deposition is granted. Park shall appear for a deposition within thirty (30) days of notice of this order, unless Yoo stipulates to extend the deadline. Yoo shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.
DATED: November 21, 2019 ___________________________
Stephen I. Goorvitch
Judge of the Superior Court
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases