SHAUN RYAN ET AL VS ANINA FLURY ET AL
Case Summary
On 08/23/2017 SHAUN RYAN filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against ANINA FLURY. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are GEORGINA T. RIZK and STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****3248
-
Filing Date:
08/23/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Court:
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
-
Courthouse:
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judges
GEORGINA T. RIZK
STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH
Party Details
Plaintiffs and Petitioners
RYAN SHAUN
POTTER LAURA
YUNG LENORA
Defendants and Respondents
VILLA FABIENNE
HERTZ CORPORATION
DOES 1 TO 50
FLURY ANINA
BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM INC.
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney
PANAH D. HESS
Court Documents
10/2/2018: NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL
10/11/2018: Proof of Personal Service
12/21/2018: Unknown
1/4/2019: Amendment to Complaint (Fictitious/Incorrect Name)
1/18/2019: Proof of Personal Service
1/25/2019: Proof of Personal Service
2/6/2019: Minute Order
3/20/2019: Disassociation of Attorney
4/26/2019: Minute Order
5/14/2019: Notice of Related Case
5/15/2019: Minute Order
5/15/2019: Unknown
8/23/2017: CoverSheet
8/23/2017: Summons
8/23/2017: Complaint
Docket Entries
- 05/15/2019
-
at 11:07 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Court Order
- 05/15/2019
-
Certificate of Mailing for (Minute Order (Court Order: Notice of Related Case) of 05/15/2019); Filed by Clerk
- 05/15/2019
-
Minute Order ( (Court Order: Notice of Related Case)); Filed by Clerk
- 05/14/2019
-
Notice of Related Case; Filed by Budget Rent a Car System, Inc. (Defendant)
- 04/26/2019
-
at 08:30 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: (ReEntry of Default) - Held - Continued
- 04/26/2019
-
at 08:30 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: (Response of Defendant) - Held - Continued
- 04/26/2019
-
Minute Order ( (Order to Show Cause Re: Response of Defendant; Order to Show ...)); Filed by Clerk
- 03/20/2019
-
Disassociation of Attorney; Filed by Laura Potter (Plaintiff); Lenora Yung (Plaintiff)
- 02/25/2019
-
at 08:30 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated
- 02/06/2019
-
at 10:00 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Court
- 01/25/2019
-
Proof of Personal Service; Filed by Shaun Ryan (Plaintiff)
- 01/18/2019
-
Proof of Personal Service; Filed by Shaun Ryan (Plaintiff)
- 01/04/2019
-
Amendment to Complaint (Fictitious/Incorrect Name); Filed by Laura Potter (Plaintiff); Shaun Ryan (Plaintiff); Lenora Yung (Plaintiff)
- 12/21/2018
-
Notice of Rejection - Pleadings; Filed by Clerk
- 10/11/2018
-
Proof of Personal Service; Filed by Shaun Ryan (Plaintiff)
- 10/02/2018
-
NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL
- 10/02/2018
-
NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL; Filed by Laura Potter (Plaintiff); Shaun Ryan (Plaintiff); Lenora Yung (Plaintiff)
- 08/23/2017
-
Complaint; Filed by Laura Potter (Plaintiff); Shaun Ryan (Plaintiff); Lenora Yung (Plaintiff)
- 08/23/2017
-
Summons; Filed by Laura Potter (Plaintiff); Shaun Ryan (Plaintiff); Lenora Yung (Plaintiff)
- 08/23/2017
-
Complaint
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: BC673248 Hearing Date: November 20, 2019 Dept: 5
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 5
|
SHAUN RYAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs, v.
anina flury, et al.,
Defendants.
|
Case No.: BC673248
Hearing Date: November 20, 2019
[TENTATIVE] order RE: Plaintiff’s motion to set aside dismissal
|
Plaintiffs Shaun Ryan, Laura Potter, and Lenora Yung (“Plaintiffs”) move to set aside the Court’s order of October 15, 2019, in which the Court dismissed this case after Plaintiffs failed to appear at the order to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this case for failure to enter defaults. The motion is granted.
Plaintiffs have advanced a declaration from their counsel, D. Hess Panah (“Counsel”). Counsel states that he failed to appear at trial because Counsel failed to properly calendar the trial date. (See Declaration of D. Hess Panah.) The Court concludes that the Court dismissed this case as a result of Counsel’s mistake. Plaintiff’s unopposed motion is granted per Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, subdivision (b).
DATED: November 20, 2019 ___________________________
Stephen I. Goorvitch
Judge of the Superior Court
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases