On 03/22/2018 SHAHROKH JAVED filed a Labor - Other Labor lawsuit against RAYTHEON COMPANY. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is HOLLY E. KENDIG. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
HOLLY E. KENDIG
DOES 1 THROUGH 25
BEROKIM & DUEL P.C.
V. JAMES DESIMONE LAW
DUEL JASMINE AZIZA
DESIMONE VINCENT JAMES
RONK STEPHEN E. ESQ.
RONK STEPHEN EARL
8/6/2019: Minute Order
6/7/2018: CIVIL DEPOSIT
6/22/2018: Minute Order
8/8/2018: AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS VERIFIED COMPLAINT
8/27/2018: DEFENDANTS RAYTHEON COMPANY, SEAN TAVENNER, AND NAOMI BRISENO'S VERIFIED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIRED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
9/25/2018: Minute Order
11/9/2018: Minute Order
11/9/2018: Ex Parte Application
4/5/2019: Notice of Lodging
4/5/2019: Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint)
4/5/2019: Memorandum of Points & Authorities
5/8/2019: Minute Order
5/4/2018: DEFENDANTS RAYTHEON COMPANY, SEAN TAVENNER, AND NAOMI BRISENO'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT
4/10/2018: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING
4/9/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
4/2/2018: PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER
3/22/2018: PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. RACE/ETHNICITY DISCRIMINATION IN VIOLATION OF FEHA; ETC
Hearingat 09:00 AM in Department 58 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury TrialRead MoreRead Less
Hearingat 09:00 AM in Department 58 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status ConferenceRead MoreRead Less
Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department 58 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Status ConferenceRead MoreRead Less
Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department 58 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Hearing on Motion for Summary JudgmentRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 58; Conference ((All-Purpose)) - HeldRead MoreRead Less
DocketMinute Order ( (Status Conference (All-Purpose))); Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department 58; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Court's MotionRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department 58; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Party's MotionRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 58; Conference (Re Mediation Setting) - Not Held - Vacated by CourtRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 58; Status Conference - Not Held - Vacated by CourtRead MoreRead Less
DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONSRead MoreRead Less
DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Plaintiff/PetitionerRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 1:30 PM in Department 42; (Affidavit of Prejudice; Case is reassigned) -Read MoreRead Less
DocketMinute OrderRead MoreRead Less
DocketMinute order entered: 2018-04-04 00:00:00; Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
DocketPEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICERRead MoreRead Less
DocketChallenge To Judicial Officer - Peremptory (170.6); Filed by Shahrokh Javed (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketComplaint; Filed by Shahrokh Javed (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketPLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. RACE/ETHNICITY DISCRIMINATION IN VIOLATION OF FEHA; ETCRead MoreRead Less
DocketSUMMONSRead MoreRead Less
Case Number: BC699287 Hearing Date: December 03, 2019 Dept: 58
JUDGE JOHN P. DOYLE
Hearing Date: December 3, 2019
Case Name: Javed v. Raytheon Company, et al.
Case No.: BC699287
Motion: Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication
Moving Party: Defendants Raytheon Company, Sean Tavenner, and Naomi Briseno
Opposing Party: Plaintiff Shahrokh Javed
Tentative Ruling: The Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication is denied.
This is an action arising from Plaintiff’s employment as a software engineer. On March 22, 2018, Plaintiff filed the operative Complaint for (1) FEHA race discrimination, (2) FEHA religious discrimination, (3) FEHA disability discrimination, (4) FEHA failure to engage in the interactive process, (5) FEHA failure to provide reasonable accommodations, (6) FEHA harassment, (7) FEHA retaliation, (8) FEHA failure to prevent discrimination, retaliation, and harassment, (9) wrongful termination, and (10) intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”).
Defendants Raytheon Company, Sean Tavenner, and Naomi Briseno seek summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication of all causes of action as well as Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages. Defendants argue, inter alia, that (1) Plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case of discrimination or retaliation; (2) there is no evidence of pretext as to the decision to terminate Plaintiff for substandard performance; (3) Plaintiff received the accommodations he requested; (4) there was no severe or pervasive conduct constituting harassment; (5) there was no extreme or outrageous conduct constituting IIED; and (6) because there was no harassment, discrimination, or retaliation, there cannot be any claim for failure to prevent such wrongs, wrongful termination, or punitive damages.
The Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication is denied because there are triable issues of fact (see, e.g., Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of Undisputed Fact ¶¶ 16, 19, 24, 26, 31, 33, 36, 53-54, 56, 58, 60), or else Defendants failed to carry their burden.