EARAH EMICK VS ANNIE RAPAPORT ET AL
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****3382
-
Filing Date:
05/31/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judge
GEORGINA T. RIZK
Party Details
Plaintiff
EMICK SARAH
Defendants and Cross Plaintiffs
RAPAPORT ROBIN
RAPAPORT ANNIE
GURNEY JOSHUA
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys
KRAMER DANIEL K. ESQ.
KRAMER HOLCOMB SHEIK LLP
JOHNSON TERESA ANN
Defendant and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys
MULVIHILL CYNTHIA COULTER ESQ.
RAFFALOW RHOADS & BRETOI
LAW OFFICE OF IRENE A. FRAZIER
SIEGEL EZRA D
Other Attorneys
DEVLIN STEPHEN THOMAS
MACDONALD SCOTT L.
VELASTEGUI MARVIN
Court Documents
2/8/2018: Unknown
2/8/2018: ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR TOTAL EQUITABLE INDEMNITY, COMPARATIVE EQUITABLE INDEMNITY AND APPORTIONMENT OF FAULT
2/20/2018: INFORMAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE FORM FOR PERSONAL INJURY COURTS
2/22/2018: Unknown
10/26/2018: Opposition
10/26/2018: Ex Parte Application
10/26/2018: Opposition
10/26/2018: Notice of Ruling
10/26/2018: Order
10/26/2018: Minute Order
11/8/2018: Request for Judicial Notice
11/8/2018: Objection
11/8/2018: Notice of Ruling
11/13/2018: Opposition
11/13/2018: Ex Parte Application
11/13/2018: Minute Order
11/14/2018: Objection
11/15/2018: Notice of Ruling
Docket Entries
- 05/23/2019
-
DocketSubstitution of Attorney; Filed by Joshua Gurney (Legacy Party)
[-] Read Less
- 05/06/2019
-
DocketAssociation of Attorney; Filed by Joshua Gurney (Legacy Party)
[-] Read Less
- 04/25/2019
-
DocketNotice (NOTICE OF HANDLING ATTORNEY CHANGE); Filed by Robin Rapaport (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 01/25/2019
-
Docketat 1:30 PM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Quash (Deposition Notice and Subpoena for Appearance and Production of Documents Issued to Charlene C. Nguyen, O.D.) - Not Held - Vacated by Court
[-] Read Less
- 01/15/2019
-
DocketNotice of Ruling; Filed by Annie Rapaport (Legacy Party); Robin Rapaport (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 01/11/2019
-
Docketat 1:30 PM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Hearing on Motion - Other (Reopen Discovery to Allow Deposition of Charlene Nguyen, D.O.) - Held - Motion Granted
[-] Read Less
- 01/11/2019
-
DocketMinute Order ((Defendant's Motion to Reopen Discovery to Allow Deposition of...)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 01/03/2019
-
DocketOpposition (Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants Annie and Robin Rapaports' Motion to Reopen Discovery); Filed by Sarah Emick (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 12/14/2018
-
DocketDefendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Reopen Discovery to Allow Deposition of Charlene Nguyen, D.O. to Take Place; Request For Sanctions in the Amount of $2100; Filed by Annie Rapaport (Legacy Party); Robin Rapaport (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 11/30/2018
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Party's Motion
[-] Read Less
- 08/03/2017
-
DocketCross-Complaint; Filed by Joshua Gurney (Legacy Party)
[-] Read Less
- 06/16/2017
-
DocketPROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
[-] Read Less
- 06/16/2017
-
DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Sarah Emick (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 06/14/2017
-
DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
[-] Read Less
- 06/14/2017
-
DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
[-] Read Less
- 06/14/2017
-
DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Sarah Emick (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 06/14/2017
-
DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Sarah Emick (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 05/31/2017
-
DocketSUMMONS
[-] Read Less
- 05/31/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by Sarah Emick (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 05/31/2017
-
DocketCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. NEGLIGENCE
[-] Read Less
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: ****3382 Hearing Date: February 13, 2020 Dept: 29
Emick v. Rapaport, et al.
Defendant Joshua Gurney’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer is GRANTED.
Defendant seeks leave to amend his answer to add an affirmative defense based on the sudden emergency doctrine. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Leave to amend is liberally granted unless there is a showing of prejudice. (See, e.g., Hulsey v. Koehler (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1150, 1159.) There is no showing of prejudice here. Thus, leave to amend is granted.
Defendant is ordered to file an amended answer within 10 days of the date of this order.
Moving party is ordered to give notice.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases