This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 10/27/2020 at 09:32:45 (UTC).

RIMA ABELIAN VS YELIZABET PETROSYAN ET AL

Case Summary

On 03/21/2018 RIMA ABELIAN filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against YELIZABET PETROSYAN. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****9228

  • Filing Date:

    03/21/2018

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

ABELIAN RIMA

Defendants, Respondents and Cross Plaintiffs

PETROSYAN HAKOP

KANG HEE D.

PETROSYAN YELIZABET

KANG INJA

DOES 1 TO 50

KANG 2016 FAMILY TRUST DOE 1

KANG 2016 FAMILY TRUST

ZINAYDA ALBARYAN INDIVIDUALLY AND DBA MAGGIE'S PASTRY

GRIGOR ALBARYAN INDIVIDUALLY AND DBA MAGGIE'S PASTRY

MAGGIE'S PASTRY AND CAFE INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA MAGGIES'S PASTRY

Cross Defendants

ALBARYAN ZINAIDA DBA MAGGIE'S PASTRY

ALBARYAN GRIGOR DBA MAGGIE'S PASTRY

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Defendant, Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

DERVISHIAN ABRAHAM ESQ.

OHANIAN SARK

Defendant, Cross Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

LAW OFFICES OF KIRK & MYERS

TAN DOMINGO R.

TAN DOMINGO REYNALDO

PALTA AMIT

ARMSTRONG ROBERT WEAVER II

ARMSTRONG ROBERT W.

KANIEWSKI JOHN ANTHONY

DERVISHIAN ABRAHAM ESQ.

LUETTO HELEN MARIE

Defendant and Cross Plaintiff Attorney

TAN DOMINGO REYNALDO

 

Court Documents

Proof of Personal Service

10/8/2020: Proof of Personal Service

Amendment to Complaint (Fictitious/Incorrect Name)

9/21/2020: Amendment to Complaint (Fictitious/Incorrect Name)

Substitution of Attorney

8/13/2020: Substitution of Attorney

Stipulation and Order - STIPULATION AND ORDER STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

7/16/2020: Stipulation and Order - STIPULATION AND ORDER STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

Substitution of Attorney

7/23/2020: Substitution of Attorney

[Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Person - [PROPOSED ORDER] AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL, FSC (AND RELATED MOTION/DISCOVERY DATES) PERSO

7/7/2020: [Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Person - [PROPOSED ORDER] AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL, FSC (AND RELATED MOTION/DISCOVERY DATES) PERSO

Notice - NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS INJA KANG, HEE D. KANG AND KANG 2016 FAMILY TRUST'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

6/23/2020: Notice - NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS INJA KANG, HEE D. KANG AND KANG 2016 FAMILY TRUST'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (COURT ORDER)

6/10/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (COURT ORDER)

Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

5/21/2020: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

Cross-Complaint

2/10/2020: Cross-Complaint

Summons - SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT

2/10/2020: Summons - SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

9/5/2018: ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS -

9/5/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS -

CIVIL DEPOSIT -

9/5/2018: CIVIL DEPOSIT -

Answer - Answer DEFENDANTS HEE D. KANG,INJA KANG,AND KANG 2016 FAMILY TRUST'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

3/7/2019: Answer - Answer DEFENDANTS HEE D. KANG,INJA KANG,AND KANG 2016 FAMILY TRUST'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT -

8/8/2018: AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT -

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS -

8/27/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS -

Summons -

3/21/2018: Summons -

46 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 04/12/2021
  • Hearing04/12/2021 at 08:30 AM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/29/2021
  • Hearing03/29/2021 at 10:00 AM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status Conference

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/14/2021
  • Hearing01/14/2021 at 13:30 PM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Hearing on Motion to Dismiss

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/06/2021
  • Hearing01/06/2021 at 13:30 PM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/26/2020
  • Docketat 2:30 PM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/22/2020
  • DocketMotion to Dismiss; Filed by Maggie's Pastry and Cafe, Inc., a California Corporation dba Maggies's Pastry (Defendant); Zinayda Albaryan, individually and dba Maggie's Pastry (Defendant); Grigor Albaryan, individually and dba Maggie's Pastry (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/08/2020
  • DocketProof of Personal Service; Filed by Rima Abelian (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/08/2020
  • DocketStipulation and Order (to Continue the Hearing Date of Motion for Summary Judgment); Filed by Hee D. Kang (Defendant); Inja Kang (Defendant); Kang 2016 Family Trust (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/08/2020
  • DocketProof of Personal Service; Filed by Rima Abelian (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/08/2020
  • DocketSubstitution of Attorney; Filed by Hakop Petrosyan (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
59 More Docket Entries
  • 09/05/2018
  • DocketAnswer; Filed by Hakop Petrosyan (Defendant); Yelizabet Petrosyan (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/05/2018
  • DocketOther - (Proof Of Service Of Summons); Filed by Rima Abelian (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/27/2018
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/27/2018
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/27/2018
  • DocketProof of Service by Substituted Service; Filed by Rima Abelian (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/08/2018
  • DocketAMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/08/2018
  • DocketAmendment to Complaint; Filed by Rima Abelian (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/21/2018
  • DocketComplaint

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/21/2018
  • DocketSummons; Filed by Rima Abelian (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/21/2018
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by Rima Abelian (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC699228    Hearing Date: February 06, 2020    Dept: 32

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 32

rima abelian,

Plaintiff,

v.

yelizabet petrosyan, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: BC699228

Hearing Date: February 6, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

defendantS’ motion for leave to file cross-complaint

Defendants Inja Kang, Hee D. Kang, and Kang 2016 Family Trust (“Defendants”) seek leave to assert a cross-complaint for indemnification and contribution against Grigor Albaryan and Zinaida Albaryan. Per Code of Civil Procedure section 428.10, a party against whom a cause of action is asserted may file a cross-complaint to assert “[a]ny cause of action he has against a person alleged to be liable thereon, whether or not such person is already a party to the action, if the cause of action asserted in his cross-complaint (1) arises out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences as the cause brought against him or (2) asserts a claim, right, or interest in the property or controversy which is the subject of the cause brought against him.” (Code Civ. Proc., §428.10, subd. (b).) A party must obtain leave of court to file a cross-complaint if the party does not file the cross-complaint at the same time as the answer. The court may grant leave to file a cross-complaint in the interests of justice at any time during the course of the action. (Code Civ. Proc., §428.10, subd. (c).)

In this case, Plaintiff Rima Abelian (“Plaintiff”) alleges she sustained injuries in an incident in which Defendant Yelizabet Petrosyan drove her vehicle into a bakery. Defendants owned the building where the accident occurred, and Grigor Albaryan and Zinaida Albaryan operated a bakery on the premises. Defendants seek indemnification from Grigor Albaryan and Zinaida Albaryan. “Undoubtedly, a claim for contribution or indemnity ‘arises out of’ the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff's claim.” (Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Superior Court (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 785, 799.) Thus, it is in the interests of justice to permit Defendants to file the proposed cross-complaint, as resolution of all issues pertaining to responsibility Plaintiff’s damages in one action is efficient. The Court therefore grants the motion.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Defendants’ motion for leave to file a cross-complaint is granted. Defendants shall file their cross-complaint within ten (10) days. Defendants shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: February 6, 2020 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court