RHONDA SANTILLI VS CHI MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****7696
-
Filing Date:
07/06/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Labor - Other Labor
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judge
MARC MARMARO
Party Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner
SANTILLI RHONDA
Defendants and Respondents
CROSSMARK MANAGEMENT GROUP GP LLC
CHI MANAGEMETN GROUP LLC
DOES 1 TO 50
CHI MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
CROSSMARK INC.
CROSSMARK INC. DBA CROSSMARK MANAGEMENT GROUP GP LLC
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys
ROTHMAN JAY S. ESQ.
JAY S. ROTHMAN & ASSOCIATES
ROTHMAN JAY STUART
Defendant and Respondent Attorneys
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART P.C
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART PC
Other Attorneys
MOON ALIS MARIE
Court Documents
1/22/2019: Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice
2/8/2019: Challenge To Judicial Officer - Peremptory (C.C.P., ? 170.6)
2/22/2019: Minute Order
2/22/2019: Unknown
2/22/2019: Notice of Case Reassignment/Vacate Hearings
2/26/2019: Notice of Case Management Conference
2/27/2019: Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint)
2/28/2019: Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint)
3/13/2019: Case Management Statement
3/18/2019: Case Management Statement
3/28/2019: Minute Order
3/14/2018: NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT AND OF ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO GIVE NOTICE
3/22/2018: DECLARATION OF SERVICE
10/17/2017: Unknown
10/17/2017: Unknown
10/18/2017: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
10/18/2017: Minute Order
10/20/2017: PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF POSTING JURY FEES
Docket Entries
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 37; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment - Not Held - Vacated by Court
[-] Read LessDocketat 08:30 AM in Department 58; Case Management Conference - Held
[-] Read LessDocketMinute Order ( (Case Management Conference)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read LessDocketCase Management Statement; Filed by Crossmark, Inc. (Defendant)
[-] Read LessDocketCase Management Statement; Filed by Rhonda Santilli (Plaintiff)
[-] Read LessDocketProof of Service (not Summons and Complaint); Filed by Rhonda Santilli (Plaintiff)
[-] Read LessDocketProof of Service (not Summons and Complaint); Filed by Crossmark, Inc. (Defendant)
[-] Read LessDocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
[-] Read LessDocketat 1:30 PM in Department 37; Court Order
[-] Read LessDocketCertificate of Mailing for (Minute Order (IN CHAMBERS COURT ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S PEREMPTORY CHAL...) of 02/22/2019); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read LessDocketNOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[-] Read LessDocketNOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[-] Read LessDocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
[-] Read LessDocketDEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
[-] Read LessDocketAnswer; Filed by Crossmark, Inc. (Defendant)
[-] Read LessDocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Rhonda Santilli (Plaintiff)
[-] Read LessDocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
[-] Read LessDocketCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY (LABOR CODE 1102.5); ETC
[-] Read LessDocketComplaint; Filed by Rhonda Santilli (Plaintiff)
[-] Read LessDocketSUMMONS
[-] Read LessTentative Rulings
b'Case Number: ****7696 Hearing Date: September 1, 2021 Dept: 58
Judge John P. Doyle
Department 58
Hearing Date: September 1, 2021
Case Name: Santilli v. Chi Management Group, LLC, et al.
Case No.: ****7696
Matter: Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication
Moving Party: Defendant Crossmark, Inc.
Responding Party: Unopposed
Tentative Ruling: The Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
Defendant Crossmark, Inc. seeks summary judgment or, alternatively, adjudication of all causes of action as well as the issue of punitive damages.
As the Motion is unopposed, it is granted. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 8.54(c); Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.)
'
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases