On 06/29/2017 RENA IRENE PASILLAS filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against THE KROGER CO. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
****6789
06/29/2017
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH
PASILLAS RENA IRENE
FOOD 4 LESS OF CALIFORNIA INC.
KROGER CO. THE
ORTIZ JOE
M704 KROGER WEST/FOOD 4 LESS
DOES 1 THROUGH 50
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA FOOD 4 LESS
FOOD 4 LESS
MAKKABI DAVID F.
D'ORO FRANK J. ESQ.
NAPLES JENNIFER WINTERS
11/1/2018: Stipulation to Continue Trial/FSC [and Related Motion/Discovery Dates] Personal Injury Courts Only (Department 91, 92, 93, 97)
5/14/2019: Stipulation to Continue Trial/FSC [and Related Motion/Discovery Dates] Personal Injury Courts Only (Department 91, 92, 93, 97)
6/13/2018: Unknown
6/25/2018: Unknown
12/8/2017: NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS
10/30/2017: Unknown
6/29/2017: COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (NEGLIGENCE/PREMISES LIABILITY)
6/29/2017: SUMMONS
7/19/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
7/19/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
7/19/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
8/2/2017: ANSWER OF RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA FOOD 4 LESS TO COMPLAINT, ETC
9/5/2017: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
9/5/2017: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
[Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Personal Injury Courts Only (Central District); Filed by Ralphs Grocery Company dba Food 4 Less (Defendant)
at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
at 10:00 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
[Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Personal Injury Courts Only (Central District); Filed by Ralphs Grocery Company dba Food 4 Less (Defendant)
CIVIL DEPOSIT
Receipt; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)
CIVIL DEPOSIT
Receipt; Filed by Food 4 Less of California, Inc. (Legacy Party)
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS
Notice of Change of Address
ANSWER OF RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA FOOD 4 LESS TO COMPLAINT, ETC
Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)
Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)
Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)
PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (NEGLIGENCE/PREMISES LIABILITY)
SUMMONS
Complaint; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)
Case Number: BC666789 Hearing Date: December 11, 2019 Dept: 5
|
RENA IRENE PASILLAS,
Plaintiff, vs.
THE KROGER COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants. |
Case No.: BC666789
Hearing Date: December 11, 2019
[TENTATIVE] order RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES |
Plaintiff Rena Irene Pasillas (“Plaintiff”) moves for an order compelling Defendant Ralphs Grocery Company (“Defendant”) to provide further answers to Plaintiff’s Special Interrogatories, Set Two and Set Three, as well as Plaintiff’s Requests for Production, Set Three. The Court rules as follows:
Special Interrogatory #52 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.
Special Interrogatory #53 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.
Special Interrogatory #56 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.
Special Interrogatory #57 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.
Special Interrogatory #62 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.
Special Interrogatory #63 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. The motion is granted because Defendant has not provided a code-compliant response. If Defendant has no footage from 5:27:15 to 5:35:41, it must provide a code-compliant response addressing this omission.
Request for Production #88 – Granted in part and denied in part. For Defendant’s former employee, Ashley Ulloa, Defendant shall produce: (1) Ms. Ulloa’s dates of employment for Defendant, (2) Ms. Ulloa’s work schedule during June and July 2015, (3) All performance evaluations, including any written reprimands, and (4) Contact information for Ms. Ulloa.
Request for Production #89 – Granted.
The parties seek sanctions in connection with this motion. An award of sanctions to either party would be unjust as both parties bear responsibility for this discovery dispute. Therefore, the Court denies both requests for sanctions.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
Plaintiff’s motions to compel further responses are granted in part and denied in part. Defendant shall provide code-compliant responses to Special Interrogatory #63, Request for Production #88, and Request for Production #89, without objections, within twenty (20) days of notice of this order. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are denied. Plaintiff shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.
DATED: December 11, 2019 ___________________________
Stephen I. Goorvitch
Judge of the Superior Court