This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 06/12/2019 at 14:55:49 (UTC).

RENA IRENE PASILLAS VS THE KROGER CO ET AL

Case Summary

On 06/29/2017 RENA IRENE PASILLAS filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against THE KROGER CO. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****6789

  • Filing Date:

    06/29/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

PASILLAS RENA IRENE

Defendants and Respondents

FOOD 4 LESS OF CALIFORNIA INC.

KROGER CO. THE

ORTIZ JOE

M704 KROGER WEST/FOOD 4 LESS

DOES 1 THROUGH 50

RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA FOOD 4 LESS

FOOD 4 LESS

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney

MAKKABI DAVID F.

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

D'ORO FRANK J. ESQ.

NAPLES JENNIFER WINTERS

 

Court Documents

Stipulation to Continue Trial/FSC [and Related Motion/Discovery Dates] Personal Injury Courts Only (Department 91, 92, 93, 97)

11/1/2018: Stipulation to Continue Trial/FSC [and Related Motion/Discovery Dates] Personal Injury Courts Only (Department 91, 92, 93, 97)

Stipulation to Continue Trial/FSC [and Related Motion/Discovery Dates] Personal Injury Courts Only (Department 91, 92, 93, 97)

5/14/2019: Stipulation to Continue Trial/FSC [and Related Motion/Discovery Dates] Personal Injury Courts Only (Department 91, 92, 93, 97)

Unknown

6/13/2018: Unknown

Unknown

6/25/2018: Unknown

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

12/8/2017: NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Unknown

10/30/2017: Unknown

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (NEGLIGENCE/PREMISES LIABILITY)

6/29/2017: COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (NEGLIGENCE/PREMISES LIABILITY)

SUMMONS

6/29/2017: SUMMONS

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

7/19/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

7/19/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

7/19/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

ANSWER OF RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA FOOD 4 LESS TO COMPLAINT, ETC

8/2/2017: ANSWER OF RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA FOOD 4 LESS TO COMPLAINT, ETC

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

9/5/2017: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

9/5/2017: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

2 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 05/14/2019
  • [Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Personal Injury Courts Only (Central District); Filed by Ralphs Grocery Company dba Food 4 Less (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/31/2018
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/13/2018
  • at 10:00 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/01/2018
  • [Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Personal Injury Courts Only (Central District); Filed by Ralphs Grocery Company dba Food 4 Less (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/25/2018
  • CIVIL DEPOSIT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/25/2018
  • Receipt; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/13/2018
  • CIVIL DEPOSIT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/13/2018
  • Receipt; Filed by Food 4 Less of California, Inc. (Legacy Party)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/08/2017
  • NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/30/2017
  • Notice of Change of Address

    Read MoreRead Less
6 More Docket Entries
  • 08/02/2017
  • ANSWER OF RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA FOOD 4 LESS TO COMPLAINT, ETC

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/19/2017
  • Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/19/2017
  • Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/19/2017
  • Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/19/2017
  • PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/19/2017
  • PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/19/2017
  • PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2017
  • COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (NEGLIGENCE/PREMISES LIABILITY)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2017
  • SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2017
  • Complaint; Filed by Rena Irene Pasillas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC666789    Hearing Date: December 11, 2019    Dept: 5

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 5

RENA IRENE PASILLAS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE KROGER COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: BC666789

Hearing Date: December 11, 2019

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES

Plaintiff Rena Irene Pasillas (“Plaintiff”) moves for an order compelling Defendant Ralphs Grocery Company (“Defendant”) to provide further answers to Plaintiff’s Special Interrogatories, Set Two and Set Three, as well as Plaintiff’s Requests for Production, Set Three. The Court rules as follows:

Special Interrogatory #52 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.

Special Interrogatory #53 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.

Special Interrogatory #56 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.

Special Interrogatory #57 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.

Special Interrogatory #62 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. However, the motion is denied because Defendant has provided a satisfactory response.

Special Interrogatory #63 – Defendant’s objections are overruled. The motion is granted because Defendant has not provided a code-compliant response. If Defendant has no footage from 5:27:15 to 5:35:41, it must provide a code-compliant response addressing this omission.

Request for Production #88 – Granted in part and denied in part. For Defendant’s former employee, Ashley Ulloa, Defendant shall produce: (1) Ms. Ulloa’s dates of employment for Defendant, (2) Ms. Ulloa’s work schedule during June and July 2015, (3) All performance evaluations, including any written reprimands, and (4) Contact information for Ms. Ulloa.

Request for Production #89 – Granted.

The parties seek sanctions in connection with this motion. An award of sanctions to either party would be unjust as both parties bear responsibility for this discovery dispute. Therefore, the Court denies both requests for sanctions.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Plaintiff’s motions to compel further responses are granted in part and denied in part. Defendant shall provide code-compliant responses to Special Interrogatory #63, Request for Production #88, and Request for Production #89, without objections, within twenty (20) days of notice of this order. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are denied. Plaintiff shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: December 11, 2019 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court