NINO CRISTIANI VS AIMCO VENEZIA, LLC
Case Summary
On 01/27/2017 NINO CRISTIANI filed a Property - Other Eviction lawsuit against AIMCO VENEZIA, LLC. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is CRAIG D. KARLAN. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****6989
-
Filing Date:
01/27/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Court:
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
-
Courthouse:
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judge
CRAIG D. KARLAN
Party Details
Plaintiffs
CRISTIANI NINO
CRISTIANI NICOLE
CRISTIANI NICLOE
Defendants, Cross Plaintiffs and Cross Defendants
AIMCO VENEZIA LLC
CASTILLO DAVID ROE 1
CASTILLO DAVID (ROE 1)
ARMORED GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.
CASTILLO DAVID
Cross Defendants and Cross Plaintiffs
GREIF BELINDA "BILLIE"
ARMORED GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.
CASTILLO DAVID
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorneys
FRIEDMAN BRUCE M.
CAMPBELL FRANCES MILLER
FARAHANI NIMA
Defendant and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys
BRADLEY & GMELICH
CAMPBELL WARREN BERTWELL
ROSSI ANGELA MARIA
LONG & DELIS
SZYMANSKI DAVID EDWARD
SALUTE DARREN PHILLIP
Cross Defendant Attorneys
CODY MICHAEL J
NING LANCE JULIAN
Court Documents
7/23/2019: Offer to Compromise and Acceptance Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 998
7/24/2019: Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6)
7/3/2019: Motion in Limine - MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF AND REFERENCE TO DEFENDANT'S FINANCIAL STATUS OR WEALTH
7/17/2019: Ex Parte Application - EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME AND SPECIALLY SET HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE
7/17/2019: Opposition - OPPOSITION TO EXPARTE TO SHORTEN TIME 7-18-19
7/18/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME AND SPECIALLY...)
6/5/2017: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER ENTERED: 2017-06-05 00:00:00
9/14/2017: Legacy Document - LEGACY DOCUMENT TYPE: MOTION TO STRIKE
6/20/2018: Legacy Document - LEGACY DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER
8/10/2018: Opposition - To Motion for Leave to File Cross Complaint
9/26/2018: Summons - CROSS-COMPLAINT
10/29/2018: Proof of Personal Service
11/14/2018: Answer - Answer Second Amended Complaint
12/6/2018: Proof of Personal Service
2/28/2019: Response - Response to Defendant AIMCO VENIZIA, LLC' Supplemental Interrogatories
3/22/2019: Stipulation and Order - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE COMPLETION DATE
4/5/2019: Reply - REPLY DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' SEPARATE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS
4/10/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (COURT ORDER)
Docket Entries
- 07/20/2020
-
Hearing07/20/2020 at 09:30 AM in Department N at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401; Jury Trial
- 07/07/2020
-
Hearing07/07/2020 at 08:30 AM in Department N at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401; Final Status Conference
- 03/26/2020
-
Hearing03/26/2020 at 08:30 AM in Department N at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401; Hearing on Motion to Strike (not anti-SLAPP) - without Demurrer
- 11/01/2019
-
DocketRequest for Dismissal; Filed by Aimco Venezia, LLC (Cross-Complainant)
- 11/01/2019
-
DocketRequest for Dismissal; Filed by Armored Group International, Inc. (Cross-Complainant)
- 10/01/2019
-
DocketNotice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information; Filed by Michael J Cody (Attorney)
- 09/06/2019
-
DocketAnswer; Filed by David Castillo (Cross-Defendant)
- 09/03/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department N, Craig D. Karlan, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Bifurcate - Held - Motion Denied
- 09/03/2019
-
DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Motion to Bifurcate)); Filed by Clerk
- 08/21/2019
-
DocketOpposition (and Objection to Motion for Bifurcation); Filed by Aimco Venezia, LLC (Defendant)
- 05/16/2017
-
DocketFirst Amended Complaint; Filed by Nino Cristiani (Plaintiff); Nicloe Cristiani (Plaintiff)
- 03/22/2017
-
DocketNotice of Motion (AND MOTION TO STRIKE EXEMPLARY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF DAVID E. SZYMANSKI ); Filed by Attorney for Defendant
- 03/22/2017
-
DocketNotice of Motion; Filed by Aimco Venezia, LLC (Defendant)
- 01/27/2017
-
DocketCivil Case Cover Sheet; Filed by Nino Cristiani (Plaintiff); Nicloe Cristiani (Plaintiff)
- 01/27/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by Nino Cristiani (Plaintiff); Nicloe Cristiani (Plaintiff)
- 01/27/2017
-
DocketSummons Filed; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
- 01/27/2017
-
DocketMiscellaneous-Other (CIVIL DEPOSIT SLIP FOR JURY FEES ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
- 01/27/2017
-
DocketSummons; Filed by Plaintiff
- 01/27/2017
-
DocketMiscellaneous-Other
- 01/27/2017
-
DocketComplaint Filed
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: SC126989 Hearing Date: July 02, 2020 Dept: N
TENTATIVE RULING
Plaintiffs Nino Cristiani and Nicole Cristiani’s Motion to Strike Armored Group International Inc.’s Cross-Complaint is DENIED, as MOOT.
Plaintiffs Nino Cristiani and Nicole Cristiani to give notice.
REASONING
Plaintiffs Nino Cristiani and Nicole Cristiani move the Court for an order striking Armored Group International Inc.’s Cross-Complaint against Billie Grief and David Castillo pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 436, subdivision (b), which allows the Court to strike all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court.
The Court takes care to note that Code of Civil Procedure section 435, subdivision (b)(1), allows any party to move to strike a pleading. Plaintiffs Nino Cristiani and Nicole Cristiani were not a party to Armored Group International, Inc.’s Cross-Complaint filed on January 30, 2018, nor were they named in a subsequent amendment. Therefore, Plaintiffs lack standing to bring a motion to strike the Cross-Complaint. Anticipated complications arising out of the filing of a cross-action do not confer standing to bring a motion to strike. (See Mot., p. 2, lines 12-13.)
Nevertheless, on November 1, 2019, Armored Group International, Inc., filed a request for dismissal of its Cross-Complaint. Thus, the dismissal of Armored Group International, Inc.’s cross-complaint renders the present motion MOOT, and it is accordingly DENIED on that basis.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases