This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 08/15/2019 at 09:29:57 (UTC).

MARTEL REID VS CENTER STREET LENDING CORPORATION ET AL

Case Summary

On 09/19/2017 MARTEL REID filed an Other lawsuit against CENTER STREET LENDING CORPORATION. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are JAMES C. CHALFANT, MALCOLM MACKEY, MICHAEL J. RAPHAEL and DENNIS J. LANDIN. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****6461

  • Filing Date:

    09/19/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

JAMES C. CHALFANT

MALCOLM MACKEY

MICHAEL J. RAPHAEL

DENNIS J. LANDIN

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs, Petitioners and Cross Defendants

REID MARTEL

GAYLE MONIQUE

ESPINOZA WENDY

BENNETT DOARIAN

REID GWENDENECE

REID GERALD

INVESTMENT BANKERS NETWORK INC. DBA INBANET

RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST I BY US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

GUILLEN VERONICA

THOMPSON VALERIA AKA VALERIE HOFFMAN

Defendants, Respondents and Cross Defendants

TICOR TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

KWIAT ANDREW AS TRUSTEE

KWIAT SONY AS TRUSTEE

GAYLE MONIQUE

TD FORECLOSURE SERVICES INC

DOES 1 TO 100

CENTER STREET LENDING CORPORATION

ESPINOZA WENDY AN INDIVIDUAL (DOE 61)

ESPINOZA WENDY

BENNETT DOARIAN

REID GERALD

MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY

THOMPSON VALERIA AKA VALERIE HOFFMAN

KWIAT SONYA

Defendants, Respondents and Cross Plaintiffs

CENTER STREET LENDING CORPORATION

KWIAT SONYA

23 More Parties Available

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

ARMSTRONG THOMAS. ESQ/

ARMSTRONG THOMAS

Defendant, Respondent and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys

TRACHTENBERG JORDAN ESQ.

GHIDOTTI MICHELLE R. ESQ.

CUNNINGHAM & TREADWELL

SQUIRE RYAN C. ESQ.

BARBA KEVIN LAW OFFICES OF

BARBA KEVIN RUBEN

SQUIRE RYAN CHRISTOPHER ESQ.

CUNNINGHAM FRANCIS JOSEPH III

GASKINS JORDAN REUEL

ANAST ALEXANDRA N.

WOOD DAVID F.

BENBOW SHANNON MARIE ESQ.

MDINARADZE MAIA

GREGORY GERALD RICHARD III

YEE STEVEN ROBERT ESQ.

Defendant and Cross Defendant Attorneys

BARBA KEVIN RUBEN

YEE STEVEN ROBERT ESQ.

ARMSTRONG THOMAS

MULLEN MARTIN J

GUERRERO JOSUE CRISTOBAL

TEEL HOLLY MARIE

3 More Attorneys Available

 

Court Documents

DEFENDANT WENDY ESPINOZA ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

4/4/2018: DEFENDANT WENDY ESPINOZA ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

4/25/2018: REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

5/15/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

Proof of Service

7/17/2018: Proof of Service

Proof of Service

7/17/2018: Proof of Service

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

7/27/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

8/31/2018: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

10/2/2018: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Summons

10/11/2018: Summons

Answer

11/14/2018: Answer

Answer

12/24/2018: Answer

Proof of Personal Service

1/3/2019: Proof of Personal Service

Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

1/14/2019: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

Minute Order

5/6/2019: Minute Order

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER OF CENTER STREET LENDING CORPORATION TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

1/24/2018: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER OF CENTER STREET LENDING CORPORATION TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER, ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT, AND TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

11/16/2017: PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER, ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT, AND TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER, ETC

11/16/2017: APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER, ETC

TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

11/16/2017: TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

269 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/30/2020
  • Hearingat 09:30 AM in Department 51 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/19/2020
  • Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department 51 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status Conference

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/02/2020
  • Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department 51 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Post-Mediation Status Conference

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/12/2019
  • DocketAnswer (SECOND AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT); Filed by Investment Bankers Network, Inc. (Cross-Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/12/2019
  • DocketRequest for Dismissal; Filed by Andrew Kwiat (Cross-Complainant); Sonya Kwiat (Cross-Complainant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/12/2019
  • DocketRequest for Dismissal; Filed by Andrew Kwiat (Cross-Complainant); Sonya Kwiat (Cross-Complainant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/11/2019
  • DocketStipulation and Order (to Dismiss Certain Causes of Action as to Investment Bankers Network Inc., Doing Business as Inbanet); Filed by Center Street Lending Corporation (Defendant); Investment Bankers Network, Inc. (Cross-Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/09/2019
  • Docketat 09:00 AM in Department 51, Dennis J. Landin, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Dismiss - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Party

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/27/2019
  • DocketNotice ( of Continuance of Trial, Final Status Conference and Trial-Related Dates); Filed by Andrew Kwiat (Defendant); Sonya Kwiat (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/27/2019
  • DocketNotice (OF TAKING MOTION fO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT); Filed by Investment Bankers Network Inc. (Non-Party)

    Read MoreRead Less
470 More Docket Entries
  • 09/29/2017
  • DocketReceipt-Depository; Filed by TICOR TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/29/2017
  • DocketDECLARATION OF NON-MONETARY STATUS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANT TICOR TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/29/2017
  • DocketDeclaration; Filed by TICOR TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/27/2017
  • DocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/27/2017
  • DocketNOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/25/2017
  • DocketNOTICE OF PENDENCY OF ACTION (LIS PENDENS)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/25/2017
  • DocketNotice of Lis Pendens; Filed by MARTEL REID (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/19/2017
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by MARTEL REID (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/19/2017
  • DocketCOMPLAINT FOR: 1. CANCELLATION OF WRITTEN INSTRUMENT (PROMISSORY NOTE) (CIVIL CODE 3412); ETC

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/19/2017
  • DocketSUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC676461    Hearing Date: February 28, 2020    Dept: 76

Motion To Compel Deposition and Production of Documents

Plaintiff Martel Reid moves to compel the deposition of Defendant Wendy Espinoza and for production of documents at deposition. Plaintiff also requests an award of monetary sanctions.

(a) If, after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party, or a person designated by an organization that is a party under Section 2025.230, without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice, the party giving the notice may move for an order compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice.

(b) A motion under subdivision (a) shall comply with both of the following:

(1) The motion shall set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice.

(2) The motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040, or, when the deponent fails to attend the deposition and produce the documents, electronically stored information, or things described in the deposition notice, by a declaration stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance.

CCP § 2025.450(a) & (b)(bold emphasis added).

Moving party has submitted a declaration indicating that the deponent’s counsel was contacted about the deponent, Wendy Espinoza’s, non-appearance at her January 22, 2020 noticed deposition. Declaration of Thomas Armstrong, ¶¶ 6 – 10. Plaintiff is entitled to an order compelling Espinoza’s deposition, as there has been no showing by Espinoza justifying her failure to appear.

A copy of the Second Amended Deposition Notice for January 22, 2020 is attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Thomas Armstrong.

Plaintiff argues that document categories 1 through 17 are necessary to establish any communications between Espinoza—who allegedly received loan proceeds—and other parties to the case, or other parties involved in the loan transactions. Plaintiff argues that document categories 18 and 19 are directly relevant to each of the $20,000.00 loan disbursements that Espinoza requested escrow to make, in that she informed escrow that the Plaintiff owed $20,000.00 to Opulence Asset Group and $20,000 to Southern California Home Investors, Inc., and requested an instruction for each disbursement.

Plaintiff has demonstrated good cause justifying production of the documents identified in the deposition notice. Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to an order compelling production of documents categories Nos. 1 – 19.

The motion to compel the deposition of Defendant Wendy Espinoza, and production of documents at deposition, is GRANTED. Deposition and production of documents is to occur within 20 days.

Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against Defendant Wendy Espinoza only is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $1,570 (5 hours at $300/hour plus $70 filing fees—see Armstrong Decl, ¶ 15). Sanctions are to be paid to Plaintiff’s counsel within 20 days.