LENORA YOU VS RITE AID ET AL

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: ****4662    Hearing Date: August 05, 2020    Dept: 74

****4662 LENORA YOU vs RITE AID

Plaintiff Lenora You’s Motion to Strike Deposition

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to strike the deposition of third-party Robert Leggings is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to seeking an authorized remedy. See CCP ;;435, 436, 437, 1987.1.

Case Number: ****4662    Hearing Date: August 13, 2020    Dept: 74

****4662 LENORA YOU vs RITE AID

Defendants Rite Aid Corporation and Thrifty Payless’ Motion to Compel Further Responses to Deposition Questions

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff is ordered to give a further response to questions 2 and 4. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are DENIED.

Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 require Plaintiff to “sort out the factual material in the case according to specific legal contentions, and to do this by memory and on the spot.” As such, they are improper. Questions 2 and 4 are factual in nature and do not call for legal conclusions.

Case Number: ****4662    Hearing Date: October 08, 2020    Dept: 74

****4662 LENORA YOU vs RITE AID

Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Third Party Deposition Subpoena (Beverly Hills Hotel)

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to quash is GRANTED IN PART. Beverly Hills Hotel is ordered to designate and produce the officers, directors, managing agents or employees most qualified to testify on its behalf having knowledge of matters 1 and 4 and to produce documents responsive to categories (a), (e), and (g).

MATTERS

1. The dates that Beverly Hills Hotel employed Lenora Bejarano You;

4. The wages and/or commissions earned by Lenora Bejarano You while employed by Beverly Hills Hotel.

DOCUMENTS

(a) Job title;

(e) The actual compensation paid to her during her employment;

(g) Actual benefits provided to her during her employment.

Case Number: ****4662    Hearing Date: October 13, 2020    Dept: 74

****4662 LENORA YOU vs RITE AID

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Third Party Deposition Subpoena (IHG Management, LLC)

(2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Third Party Deposition Subpoena (WINPIN 85 Investments, LLC)

TENTATIVE RULINGS:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Third Party Deposition Subpoena (IHG Management, LLC) is GRANTED IN PART. IHG is ordered to designate and produce the officers, directors, managing agents or employees most qualified to testify on its behalf having knowledge of matters 1 and 3 and to produce documents responsive to categories (a), (e), and (g).

MATTERS

1. The dates that IHG Management, LLC employed Lenora Bejarano You;

3. The wages and/or commissions earned by your current or former employee, Lenor Bejarano You, during her employment with IHG Management, LLC;

DOCUMENTS

Any and all documents relating to the employment of Lenora Bejarano you from January1, 2017 to present, including but not limited to documents relating to the following:

(a) Job title;

(e) The actual compensation paid to her during her employment; and

(g) Actual benefits provided to her during her employment.

(2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Third Party Deposition Subpoena (IHG Management, LLC) is GRANTED IN PART. IHG is ordered to designate and produce the officers, directors, managing agents or employees most qualified to testify on its behalf having knowledge of matters 1 and 3 and to produce documents responsive to categories (a), (e), and (g).

MATTERS

1. The dates that WinPin 85 Investments, LLC employed Lenora Bejarano You;

3. The wages and/or commissions earned by your current or former employee, Lenor Bejarano You, during her employment with WinPin 85 Investments, LLC;

DOCUMENTS

(a) Job title;

(e) The actual compensation paid to her during her employment; and

(g) Actual benefits provided to her during her employment.