On 11/09/2017 KURT SPROUL filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against ALISSA GAIL MYER. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is GEORGINA T. RIZK. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
****3047
11/09/2017
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
GEORGINA T. RIZK
SPROUL KURT
MYER ALISSA GAIL
DOES 1 TO 100
MYER BARBARA
B & D LAW GROUP APLC
FARID MAHSA
GILERMAN GABRIELLE RACHEL
SHRAIBATI MALEK HAMED
10/4/2018: Other -
10/4/2018: Motion to Quash
10/4/2018: Motion to Quash
11/26/2018: Opposition
11/28/2018: Opposition
12/4/2018: Reply
12/10/2018: Order Appointing Court Approved Reporter as Official Reporter Pro Tempore
12/12/2018: Minute Order
12/12/2018: Order
1/11/2019: Opposition
3/4/2019: Request for Judicial Notice
3/4/2019: Motion to Compel
3/4/2019: Motion to Compel
3/4/2019: Request for Judicial Notice
6/13/2019: Notice
8/10/2018: DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
11/9/2017: Unknown
11/9/2017: SUMMONS
Notice (OF CHANGE OF LEAD HANDLING ATTORNEY); Filed by Alissa Gail Myer (Defendant); Barbara Myer (Defendant)
at 08:30 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
at 10:00 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
at 10:00 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses (Special Interrogatories) - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Party
at 10:00 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses (Demand for Production) - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Party
[Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Personal Injury Courts Only (Central District) ((further trial continuances by Motion or Stipulation)); Filed by Alissa Gail Myer (Defendant); Barbara Myer (Defendant)
Separate Statement (SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES); Filed by Alissa Gail Myer (Defendant); Barbara Myer (Defendant)
Motion to Compel (PLAINTIFF?S FURTHER RESPONSES TO DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (SET TWO) PURSUANT TO C.C.P 2025,220; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; REQUEST FOR REASONABLE SANCTIONS AND ATTORNEYS? FEES; DE); Filed by Alissa Gail Myer (Defendant); Barbara Myer (Defendant)
Motion to Compel (PLAINTIFF?S FURTHER RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES (SET TWO); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; REQUEST FOR REASONABLE SANCTIONS AND ATTORNEYS? FEES; DECLARATION OF VANESSA A. HUEY; [PROPOSED); Filed by Alissa Gail Myer (Defendant); Barbara Myer (Defendant)
Separate Statement; Filed by Alissa Gail Myer (Defendant); Barbara Myer (Defendant)
Miscellaneous-Other; Filed by Kurt Sproul (Plaintiff)
Motion to Quash; Filed by Kurt Sproul (Plaintiff)
Motion to Quash; Filed by Kurt Sproul (Plaintiff)
Miscellaneous-Other; Filed by Kurt Sproul (Plaintiff)
DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Answer; Filed by Alissa Gail Myer (Defendant); Barbara Myer (Defendant)
ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER
SUMMONS
Complaint; Filed by Kurt Sproul (Plaintiff)
COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)
Case Number: BC683047 Hearing Date: February 20, 2020 Dept: 29
Sproul v. Myer et al.
Plaintiff’s four motions to compel Defendants Alissa Gail Myer and Barbara Myer to Respond to Request for Supplemental Interrogatories, Set Two and Demand for Production of Documents, Set Two, and for sanctions filed on 01/14/20 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motions to compel responses are DENIED as moot MOOT. Defendants served responses to the discovery at issue after the motion was filed.
The motions are GRANTED with respect to the requests for sanctions. The Court imposes sanctions in the total sum of $1000 against Defendants’ counsel of record, Adam Wright, Esq. and Veatch Carlson, LLP for failure to respond to authorized methods of discovery, which constitutes discovery abuse, and whose conduct necessitated motion practice. (Code Civ. Proc. §2023.010(a)(4); § 2033.280(c).) The Court declines to impose sanctions against Defendants because defense counsel presented evidence that the failure to respond was due to counsel’s mistakes and not the conduct of Defendants.
Moving parties are ordered to give notice.