Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 12/21/2020 at 20:42:52 (UTC).

KRYSTAL SANCHEZ VS MARIA M RAMIREZ REYES ET AL

Case Summary

On 10/10/2017 KRYSTAL SANCHEZ filed a Labor - Other Labor lawsuit against MARIA M RAMIREZ REYES. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****9494

  • Filing Date:

    10/10/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Labor - Other Labor

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

SANCHEZ KRYSTAL

Defendants and Respondents

LAS DELICIAS DE PUEBLA

DOES 1 TO 40

REYES MARIA M. RAMIREZ

BANETASCRUZ MARCOS

VANEGASCRUZ MARCO ANTONIO

VANEGASCRUZ MARCO

PUEBLA LAS DELICIAS DE

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney

KOZICH S. DAVID ESQ.

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

LAW OFFICES OF WALTER F. WIGGINS JR.

WIGGINS WALTER FRANKLIN JR

Court Documents

Court documents are not available for this case.

 

Docket Entries

  • 10/04/2021
  • Hearing10/04/2021 at 08:30 AM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/20/2021
  • Hearing09/20/2021 at 10:00 AM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status Conference

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/05/2021
  • Hearing01/05/2021 at 08:30 AM in Department 32 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery (not "Further Discovery")

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/02/2020
  • DocketMotion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery) - 1 moving party, 1 motion; Filed by KRYSTAL SANCHEZ (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/13/2020
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; (OSC RE Dismissal) - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/30/2020
  • Docketat 10:30 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Trial Setting Conference - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/30/2020
  • DocketCertificate of Mailing for ((Trial Setting Conference) of 09/30/2020); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/30/2020
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Trial Setting Conference)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/23/2020
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/09/2020
  • Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
15 More Docket Entries
  • 05/30/2018
  • DocketREQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/30/2018
  • DocketRequest for Entry of Default / Judgment; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/30/2018
  • DocketRequest for Entry of Default / Judgment; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/12/2017
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/12/2017
  • DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by KRYSTAL SANCHEZ (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/12/2017
  • DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by KRYSTAL SANCHEZ (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/12/2017
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/10/2017
  • DocketSUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/10/2017
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by KRYSTAL SANCHEZ (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/10/2017
  • DocketCOMPLAINT FOR: 1. UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT BASED ON SCX (CAL. GOV CODE 12940(J)); ETC

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC679494    Hearing Date: January 05, 2021    Dept: 32

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 32

krystal sanchez,

Plaintiff,

v.

Maria M. Ramirez Reyes, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: BC679494

Hearing Date: January 5, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

motion to compel discovery responses

Plaintiff Krystal Sanchez (“Plaintiff”) moves to compel responses from Defendants Maria Ramirez Reyes and Las Delicias De Puebla (“Defendants”) to: (1) Request for Production of Documents, Set One (“RPD”); (2) Form Interrogatories, Set One and Form Interrogatories (Employment), Set One (“FROGs”); and (3) Requests for Admissions, Set One (“RFAs”).

Plaintiff electronically served the written discovery on Defendants on May 4, 2020. Plaintiff offered Defendants extensions of time to respond through October 15, 2020. After Plaintiff filed these motions, Defendant’s counsel filed a declaration stating that Defendant has served verified responses, without objections. Therefore, the motion is denied as moot except with respect to sanctions.

Plaintiff seeks sanctions in connection with the motion. The Court concludes that Defendants’ failure to respond to the discovery is an abuse of the discovery process. Indeed, the discovery was served on May 4, 2020, and the responses were not served for approximately seven months. The Court has considered Defendant’s counsel’s declaration and finds good cause not to sanction counsel, but the declaration provides no excuse for his client’s excessive delays. Therefore, the Court orders Defendants, but not Defendant’s counsel, to pay sanctions in the amount of $1,060, based upon four hours of attorney time at $250 per hour plus one filing fee of $60.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Plaintiff’s motion is denied as moot except with respect to sanctions. The Court orders Defendants to pay sanctions in the amount of $1,060 within thirty (30) days of notice of this order. Plaintiff shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: January 5, 2020 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer KOZICH S. DAVID