JULIETA PAYUMO VS FELICIA SUZANNE FADLON
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****3755
-
Filing Date:
06/02/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judges
LAURA A. SEIGLE
AMY D. HOGUE
Party Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner
PAYUMO JULIETA
Defendants and Respondents
DOES 1 TO 509
FADLON FELICIA SUZANNE
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys
ROCA JENNA ESQ.
ROCA JENNA RAE
Defendant Attorney
MARTIN FRANCIS
Court Documents
6/2/2017: COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)
6/2/2017: SUMMONS
6/3/2019: Minute Order
3/4/2019: Minute Order
2/25/2019: Declaration
2/25/2019: Proof of Service by Substituted Service
12/28/2018: Demand for Jury Trial
12/28/2018: Answer
12/5/2018: Proof of Service by Substituted Service
12/3/2018: Order
12/3/2018: Ex Parte Application
12/3/2018: Minute Order
11/16/2018: Minute Order
Docket Entries
- 06/03/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Trial Setting Conference - Held
[-] Read Less
- 06/03/2019
-
DocketMinute Order ( (Trial Setting Conference)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 03/04/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to File Proof of Service - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Court
[-] Read Less
- 03/04/2019
-
DocketMinute Order ( (Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to File Proof of Service)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 02/25/2019
-
DocketProof of Service by Substituted Service; Filed by Julieta Payumo (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 02/25/2019
-
DocketDeclaration (of Jenna R. Roca, Esq. re OSC re Service); Filed by Julieta Payumo (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 12/28/2018
-
DocketAnswer; Filed by Felicia Suzanne Fadlon (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 12/28/2018
-
DocketDemand for Jury Trial; Filed by Felicia Suzanne Fadlon (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 12/05/2018
-
DocketProof of Service by Substituted Service; Filed by Julieta Payumo (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 12/03/2018
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 7, Amy D. Hogue, Presiding; Ex-Parte Proceedings - Held - Motion Granted
[-] Read Less
- 12/03/2018
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 7, Amy D. Hogue, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated
[-] Read Less
- 12/03/2018
-
DocketOrder (on Plaintiff's Ex parte Application for Order to Continue Trial); Filed by Julieta Payumo (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 12/03/2018
-
DocketEx Parte Application (to continue trial)
[-] Read Less
- 12/03/2018
-
DocketMinute Order ((Jury Trial; Ex-Parte Proceedings)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 11/16/2018
-
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 7, Amy D. Hogue, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Held
[-] Read Less
- 11/16/2018
-
DocketMinute Order ((Final Status Conference)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 06/02/2017
-
DocketCOMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)
[-] Read Less
- 06/02/2017
-
DocketSUMMONS
[-] Read Less
- 06/02/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by Julieta Payumo (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: ****3755 Hearing Date: March 10, 2020 Dept: 27
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION; MOTION TO DEEM RFAS ADMITTED
On February 10, 2020, Plaintiff Julieta Payumo served a notice of deposition on Defendant Felicia Fadlon for a deposition on February 20, 2020. On January 24, 2020, Plaintiff served requests for admission on Defendant. The earliest the responses could be due would be February 24, 2020. On February 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel the deposition, even though the noticed date was still six days in the future, and a motion to deem the RFAs admitted, even though the response date was at least ten days in the future. Plaintiff argued that it was filing those motions in case Defendant did not appear or did not serve RFA response.
Plaintiff cites no law that she may file “just in case” motions to compel. Because the allegedly wrongful act has not yet taken place, and Plaintiff can only surmise what might happen in the future, the motions fail to give Defendant notice of the dispute at issue. Further, the motions were set for hearing after the discovery motion cutoff date. (Code Civ. Proc. ; 2024.020.) The current trial date is March 23, 2020, with a discovery motion cutoff date of March 9, 2020. These motions were set for hearing on March 10 and March 12. They are therefore too late.
For these reasons, the motions are DENIED.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases