This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 02/02/2020 at 02:36:57 (UTC).

JOSE CERVANTES VS PAK FAMILY CORPORATION ET AL

Case Summary

On 10/26/2017 JOSE CERVANTES filed a Labor - Wrongful Termination lawsuit against PAK FAMILY CORPORATION. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are MICHAEL P. LINFIELD, BARBARA M. SCHEPER and EDWARD B. MORETON. The case status is Not Classified By Court.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****1373

  • Filing Date:

    10/26/2017

  • Case Status:

    Not Classified By Court

  • Case Type:

    Labor - Wrongful Termination

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

MICHAEL P. LINFIELD

BARBARA M. SCHEPER

EDWARD B. MORETON

 

Party Details

Petitioner and Plaintiff

CERVANTES JOSE

Respondents and Defendants

PAK CHOL S.

PAK CHOL H

DOES 1 TO 10

PAK YONG C.

PAK FAMILY CORPORATION

PAK CHOL H.

Other

LEE MAXIMILIAN

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Defendant, Petitioner and Plaintiff Attorneys

TOOBI JUSTIN ESQ

LEE MAXIMILIAN

TOOBI JUSTIN

Respondent, Defendant and Plaintiff Attorneys

WOO THERESA ESQ.

TOOBI JUSTIN ESQ

WOO THERESA

Respondent and Defendant Attorney

WOO THERESA ESQ.

 

Court Documents

Opposition - OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

1/16/2020: Opposition - OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS)

1/29/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS)

Motion for Sanctions

12/2/2019: Motion for Sanctions

Order - ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S POST-JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES

11/12/2019: Order - ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S POST-JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES

Order - ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF JOSE CERVANTESS MOTION FOR POST- JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES AGAINST DEFENDANTS PAK FAMILY CORPORATION AND CHOL HYON PAK

11/18/2019: Order - ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF JOSE CERVANTESS MOTION FOR POST- JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES AGAINST DEFENDANTS PAK FAMILY CORPORATION AND CHOL HYON PAK

Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest

11/20/2019: Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest

Notice - NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER

11/20/2019: Notice - NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER

RETURNED MAIL

11/21/2019: RETURNED MAIL

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (RULING ON SUBMITTED MATTER RE HEARING ON MOTION TO TAX COSTS)

11/8/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (RULING ON SUBMITTED MATTER RE HEARING ON MOTION TO TAX COSTS)

Certificate of Mailing for - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FOR (RULING ON SUBMITTED MATTER RE HEARING ON MOTION TO TAX COSTS) OF 11/08/2019

11/8/2019: Certificate of Mailing for - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FOR (RULING ON SUBMITTED MATTER RE HEARING ON MOTION TO TAX COSTS) OF 11/08/2019

Affidavit - AFFIDAVIT SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF JOSE CERVANTESS MOTION FOR POST- JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES AGAINST DEFENDANTS PAK FAMILY CORPORATION AND CHOL HYON PAK

11/13/2019: Affidavit - AFFIDAVIT SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF JOSE CERVANTESS MOTION FOR POST- JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES AGAINST DEFENDANTS PAK FAMILY CORPORATION AND CHOL HYON PAK

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT)

11/7/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT)

Notice of Ruling - NOTICE OF RULING PLAINTIFF JOSE CERVANTESS NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CORRECT JUDGMENT NUNC PRO TUNC FOR CLERICAL ERROR

11/7/2019: Notice of Ruling - NOTICE OF RULING PLAINTIFF JOSE CERVANTESS NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CORRECT JUDGMENT NUNC PRO TUNC FOR CLERICAL ERROR

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES)

11/8/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES)

Reply - REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR POST-JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES

11/4/2019: Reply - REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR POST-JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES

Opposition - OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS AND FEES

10/28/2019: Opposition - OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS AND FEES

102 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 01/29/2020
  • Docketat 09:30 AM in Department 44, Edward B. Moreton, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Sanctions - Held - Motion Granted

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/29/2020
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Motion for Sanctions)); Filed by Clerk

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/16/2020
  • DocketOpposition (to Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions); Filed by Pak Family Corporation (Defendant); Chol H. Pak (Defendant)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 12/02/2019
  • DocketMotion for Sanctions; Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/21/2019
  • DocketRETURNED MAIL; Filed by Clerk

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/20/2019
  • DocketMemorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest; Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/20/2019
  • DocketNotice (of Entry of Order); Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/18/2019
  • DocketOrder (GRANTING PLAINTIFF JOSE CERVANTES?S MOTION FOR POST- JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES AGAINST DEFENDANTS PAK FAMILY CORPORATION AND CHOL HYON PAK); Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/13/2019
  • DocketAffidavit (SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF JOSE CERVANTES?S MOTION FOR POST- JUDGMENT COSTS AND FEES AGAINST DEFENDANTS PAK FAMILY CORPORATION AND CHOL HYON PAK); Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/12/2019
  • DocketOrder (Granting Plaintiff's Post-Judgment Costs and Fees); Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
147 More Docket Entries
  • 02/13/2018
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 02/09/2018
  • DocketFIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR: 1. FAILURE TO PAY WAGES DUE, ETC

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 02/09/2018
  • DocketFirst Amended Complaint; Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 02/09/2018
  • DocketCIVIL CASE COVER SHEET

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 02/09/2018
  • DocketMiscellaneous-Other; Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/17/2017
  • DocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/17/2017
  • DocketNOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/26/2017
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by Jose Cervantes (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/26/2017
  • DocketSUMMONS

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/25/2017
  • DocketCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: ****1373    Hearing Date: June 29, 2020    Dept: 34

SUBJECT: Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel

Moving Party: Justin Toobi & Maximilian Lee, counsel for Jose Cervantes

Resp. Party: None

The motion to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND:

Plaintiff Jose Cervantes filed this action on October 26, 2017. The operative second amended complaint asserts causes of action for (1) Failure to Pay Wages; (2) Failure to Pay Minimum Wage; (3) Failure to Pay Overtime; (4) Failure to Provide Meal and Rest Breaks; (5) Failure to Furnish Wage Statements; (6) Unfair Competition; (7) Waiting Time Penalties; (8) Retaliation; (9) Wrongful Termination; (10) Discrimination Disability; (11) Failure to Accommodate; (12) Failure to Engage in Interactive Process; and (13) Disability Harassment.

On March 8, 2019, Judgment was entered in this matter.

On April 6, 2020, Justin Toobi & Maximilian Lee, counsel for Plaintiff, filed the instant motion to be relieved as counsel.

ANALYSIS:

An attorney moving to be relieved as counsel under California Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) must meet the requirements set out in California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362. To comply with rule 3.1362, the moving party must submit the following forms: (1) Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel; (2) Declaration in Support of Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel; and (3) Order Granting Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(a), (c), (e).) The moving party must serve the aforementioned forms on the client and all other parties who have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d).) Further, when the client is served by mail, the attorney's declaration must show that the client's address was confirmed within the last 30 days and how it was confirmed. (Id.) Absent a showing of resulting prejudice, an attorney’s request for withdrawal should be granted. (People v. Prince (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 398, 406.)

Counsel’s motion complies with all of the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, in that Counsel provided a notice of motion and motion to be relieved as counsel; order granting attorneys’ motion to be relieved as counsel; and declaration in support of the motions to be relieved as counsel. Additionally, Counsel’s client was notified by mailing the motion and supporting documents to his last known address and by telephone. (See Declaration, Nos. 3(a), 3(b)(2)(b).) Counsel also filed a proof of service demonstrating that they served all other parties who have appeared in the case. This motion has also not been opposed by any party to the case.

The motion to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED.



related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer TOOBI JUSTIN