On 07/31/2017 JOHN VORZIMER filed a Contract - Insurance lawsuit against STEVEN BERKOWITZ. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is STEPHANIE M. BOWICK. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
****0628
07/31/2017
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
STEPHANIE M. BOWICK
VORZIMER JOHN
VORZIMER SAMANTHA
ROES 1 THROUGH 10
THE KADISH LAW GROUP PC
BROWNING & JACOBS INC
DOES 1 TO 20
LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN BERKOWITZ
SALTZMAN GLASSMAN
BERKOWITZ STEVEN
THE BERKOWITZ LAW GROUP
GLASSMAN BROWNING SALTSMAN & JACOBS
PARKER DAVID B. ESQ.
PARKER DAVID BRUCE ESQ.
MURPHY JAMES A.
KADISH MICHAEL B. ESQ.
SERVAIS ANDREW A.
WALSHOK COLIN HOWARD
MURPHY JAMES ANTHONY
SERVAIS ANDREW A
KADISH MICHAEL B. ESQ.
2/13/2018: Unknown
8/3/2018: DEFENDANTS STEVEN BERKOWITZ, LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN BERKOWITZ, A.P.C, THE BERKOWITZ LAW GROUP, A.P.C., AND THE KADISH LAW GROUP, P.C. NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
8/9/2018: DECLARATION OF KRISTIN L. IVERSEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GLASSMAN, BROWNING, SALTSMAN & JACOBS, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10/9/2018: Opposition
10/9/2018: Declaration
10/23/2018: Order Appointing Court Approved Reporter as Official Reporter Pro Tempore
10/25/2018: Reply
12/3/2018: Notice of Ruling
12/19/2018: Ex Parte Application
12/19/2018: Minute Order
4/26/2019: Declaration
4/26/2019: Memorandum
4/26/2019: Notice
11/28/2017: Minute Order
12/4/2017: REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GLASSMAN, BROWNING, SALTSMAN & JACOBS, INC.'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE
11/7/2017: Proof of Service
10/27/2017: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GLASSMAN, BROWNING, SALTSMAN & JACOBS, INC'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE
8/28/2017: Unknown
Request for Refund / Order; Filed by The Berkowitz Law Group (Defendant); The Kadish Law Group PC (Defendant)
at 08:46 AM in Department 19; Court Order
Minute Order ( (Court Order)); Filed by Clerk
Certificate of Mailing for (Minute Order (Court Order) of 05/22/2019); Filed by Clerk
Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint); Filed by Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); Law Offices Of Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); The Berkowitz Law Group (Defendant) et al.
Request for Judicial Notice; Filed by Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); Law Offices Of Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); The Berkowitz Law Group (Defendant) et al.
Declaration (of Servais ISO Kadish-Berkowitz CONTINUED Motion for Summary Judgment); Filed by Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); Law Offices Of Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); The Berkowitz Law Group (Defendant) et al.
Notice (of CONTINUED Motion and Kadish-Berkowitz Continued Motion for Summary Judgment); Filed by Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); Law Offices Of Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); The Berkowitz Law Group (Defendant) et al.
Notice of Lodging (without Exhibits iso Kadish-Berkowitz CONTINUED Motion for Summary Judgment); Filed by Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); Law Offices Of Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); The Berkowitz Law Group (Defendant) et al.
Declaration (of Berkowitz ISO Kadish-Berkowitz CONTINUED Motion for Summary Judgment); Filed by Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); Law Offices Of Steven Berkowitz (Defendant); The Berkowitz Law Group (Defendant) et al.
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
Notice of Related Cases
Notice of Related Case; Filed by John Vorzimer (Plaintiff)
Notice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
COMPLAINT FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE
Notice of Related Cases
Complaint; Filed by null
SUMMONS
Case Number: BC670628 Hearing Date: September 17, 2020 Dept: 19
After consideration of the briefing and pleadings filed, Plaintiff John Vorzimer’s and Plaintiff Samantha Vorzimer’s Motion to Tax [and/or Strike] Costs of Defendants Steven Berkowitz, Law Offices of Steve Berkowitz, the Berkowitz Law Group, and the Kadish Law Group is GRANTED in its entirety. The motion is unopposed. On September 11, 2020, Defendants filed a "Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Tax Costs," stating that they do not oppose the items identified in the motion.
Accordingly, Defendants' costs are reduced in the amount of
Counsel for the Plaintiffs to give notice.