JENIFER J PYTKO ET AL VS CYRIL VIGUIER ET AL
Case Summary
On 03/13/2017 JENIFER J PYTKO filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against CYRIL VIGUIER. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are YOLANDA OROZCO, LAURA A. SEIGLE, ELIZABETH ALLEN WHITE, MICHAEL L. STERN, ANTHONY MOHR and TIMOTHY PATRICK DILLON. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****4033
-
Filing Date:
03/13/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Court:
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
-
Courthouse:
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judges
YOLANDA OROZCO
LAURA A. SEIGLE
ELIZABETH ALLEN WHITE
MICHAEL L. STERN
ANTHONY MOHR
TIMOTHY PATRICK DILLON
Party Details
Plaintiffs, Petitioners and Guardian Ad Litems
PYTKO JENIFER J.
PYTKO JESSICA
Defendants, Respondents and Cross Defendants
TIBOLD ASSET MANAGEMENT INC.
DOES 1 THROUGH 40
PARTNERS TRUST REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE &
VIGUIER CYRIL
VIGUIER ISABEL
DRYMASTER RESTORATION DOE 3
AMBIENTE CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN CORP. DOE 2
SORRENTO BEACH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION [DOE 1]
Defendants, Respondents, Cross Plaintiffs and Cross Defendants
VIGUIER CYRIL
VIGUIER ISABEL
DRYMASTER RESTORATION DOE 3
AMBIENTE CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN CORP. DOE 2
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys
BALABAN DANIEL K. ESQ.
BALABAN DANIEL KEITH ESQ.
Defendant, Respondent and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys
GREGORY J. CARPENTER
GRANT GENOVESE & BARATTA LLP
CARPENTER GREGORY J.
DOMINGUEZ DARIN
CARPENTER GREGORY JAMES
ROBERTS JASON SKOCZULEK
BERGSTEN ROBERT
DOLAN ROBERT T.
DOLAN ROBERT TRACEY
GROSFELD ROBERT
Defendant and Respondent Attorneys
GREGORY J. CARPENTER
GRANT GENOVESE & BARATTA LLP
Defendant, Cross Defendant and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys
ROBERTS JASON SKOCZULEK
BERGSTEN ROBERT
GROSFELD ROBERT
Court Documents
10/17/2019: Answer
10/17/2019: Answer
9/11/2019: Certificate of Mailing for - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FOR (RULING ON SUBMITTED MATTERS 1. CROSS-COMPLAINANT ISABEL VIG...) OF 09/11/2019
9/6/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES (RES ...)
7/24/2019: Case Management Statement
6/13/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER)
6/5/2019: Brief - BRIEF RE: WITHDRAWAL OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE
5/7/2019: Objection - OBJECTION PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT AMBIENTE CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN CORP.'S PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICAL OFFICER UNDER CODE CIV. PROC., 170.6
5/2/2019: Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses
5/2/2019: Declaration - DECLARATION OF TYLER M. ROSS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL TIBOLD'S FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES
4/23/2019: Notice of Case Reassignment/Vacate Hearings
4/9/2019: Notice - NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT
3/11/2019: Opposition - OPPOSITION PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT AMBIENTE CONSTRUCITON & DESIGN CORP'S DEMURRER TO THE COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES; DEC OF VANESS L. LOFTUS-BREWER
4/2/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS -
4/30/2018: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT -
5/2/2018: DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
6/13/2018: NOTICE OF RULING REGARDING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
5/5/2017: APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
Docket Entries
- 01/11/2022
-
Hearing01/11/2022 at 08:30 AM in Department 73 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial
- 01/04/2022
-
Hearing01/04/2022 at 08:30 AM in Department 73 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status Conference
- 10/14/2021
-
Hearing10/14/2021 at 08:30 AM in Department 73 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Hearing on Motion for Summary Adjudication
- 04/06/2021
-
DocketNotice (OF CASE REASSIGNMENT AND ORDER); Filed by Jenifer J. Pytko (Plaintiff)
- 03/29/2021
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 73, Timothy Patrick Dillon, Presiding; Jury Trial (estimated 10 days) - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
- 03/26/2021
-
DocketNotice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice; Filed by Clerk
- 03/15/2021
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 73, Timothy Patrick Dillon, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Held - Continued
- 01/22/2021
-
DocketNotice (PLAINTIFF?S NOTICE OF THE COURT?S NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER); Filed by Jenifer J. Pytko (Plaintiff)
- 01/15/2021
-
DocketNotice (of Entry of Order to Stipulation to Continue Trial and Related Dates); Filed by Ambiente Construction & Design Corp. DOE 2 (Defendant)
- 01/12/2021
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 73, Timothy Patrick Dillon, Presiding; Court Order
- 02/23/2018
-
DocketAmendment to Complaint; Filed by Jenifer J. Pytko (Plaintiff); Jessica Pytko (Plaintiff)
- 02/23/2018
-
DocketAMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT
- 10/26/2017
-
DocketNOTICE OF REJECTION APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
- 09/29/2017
-
DocketApplication ; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner
- 09/29/2017
-
DocketAPPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
- 06/12/2017
-
DocketNOTICE OF REJECTION - APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
- 05/05/2017
-
DocketApplication ; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner
- 05/05/2017
-
DocketAPPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
- 03/13/2017
-
DocketCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. INTENTIONAL NFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; ETC
- 03/13/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by Jenifer J. Pytko (Plaintiff); Jessica Pytko (Plaintiff)
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: BC654033 Hearing Date: September 10, 2020 Dept: 73
9/10/2020
Dept. 73
Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding
JENIFER J. PYTKO, et al. v. CYRIL VIGUIER, et al. (BC654033)
Counsel for Defendant/moving party Everlast Building Construction, Inc. dba Drymaster Restoration: Robert Bergsten, Benjamin Goldstein (Hosp, Gilbert & Bergsten)
Other counsel: Omitted.
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-COMPLAINT (filed 8/3/2020)
TENTATIVE RULING
The motion is granted.
Discussion
The unopposed motion (filed 8/3/2020) for leave to file a cross-complaint against Cyril Vigieur and Ambiente Construction and Design Corp. is GRANTED. CCP §§ 426.50; 473(a); 576. The cross-complaint attached as Exhibit A to the motion is deemed filed and served on all previously served and appearing parties as indicated on the proof of service of the motion. Moving party must file a stand-alone original pleading within 5 days. Cross-defendants must file a responsive pleading within 15 days. If any cross-defendant fails to do so, cross-complainants must request entry of default within 30 days thereafter. The court sets a non-appearance date for status of the cross-complaint in 60 days: _____________. Notice of ruling by moving party.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases