Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 03/03/2021 at 00:44:48 (UTC).

JAQUELINE JOE VS EDSON YANER DELCID ET AL

Case Summary

On 02/28/2018 JAQUELINE JOE filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against EDSON YANER DELCID. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are JON R. TAKASUGI, HOLLY E. KENDIG and THOMAS D. LONG. The case status is Other.

Case Details Parties Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****5662

  • Filing Date:

    02/28/2018

  • Case Status:

    Other

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

JON R. TAKASUGI

HOLLY E. KENDIG

THOMAS D. LONG

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

JOE JAQUELINE

Defendants and Respondents

DELCID EDSON YANER

DOES 1 TO 10

WIRING CONNECTION INC

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney

JEFFRIES FRANKLIN P.

Defendant Attorney

LOUREIRO KARL

Court Documents

Court documents are not available for this case.

 

Docket Entries

  • 03/01/2021
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 31, Thomas D. Long, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (Re Failure to Prosecute within 3yrs) - Not Held - Vacated by Court

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/17/2020
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 31, Thomas D. Long, Presiding; Trial Setting Conference - Not Held - Vacated by Court

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/22/2020
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 31, Thomas D. Long, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/21/2020
  • DocketProof of Service (not Summons and Complaint); Filed by Jaqueline Joe (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/21/2020
  • DocketRequest for Dismissal; Filed by Jaqueline Joe (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/08/2020
  • Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 31, Thomas D. Long, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/23/2020
  • Docketat 2:00 PM in Department 31, Thomas D. Long, Presiding; Court Order

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/23/2020
  • DocketCertificate of Mailing for ((Court Order) of 03/23/2020); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/23/2020
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Court Order)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/12/2020
  • DocketNotice of Settlement (of Entire Case); Filed by Edson Yaner Delcid (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
25 More Docket Entries
  • 04/10/2018
  • DocketORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER (SUPERIOR COURT)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/10/2018
  • DocketOrder on Court Fee Waiver (Superior Court); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/09/2018
  • DocketANSWER PERSONAL INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/09/2018
  • DocketAnswer; Filed by Edson Yaner Delcid (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/09/2018
  • DocketRequest to Waive Court Fees; Filed by Edson Yaner Delcid (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/13/2018
  • DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Jaqueline Joe (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/13/2018
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/28/2018
  • DocketSUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/28/2018
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by Jaqueline Joe (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/28/2018
  • DocketCOMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC695662    Hearing Date: February 25, 2020    Dept: 31

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

JAQUELINE JOE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EDSON YANER DEL CID, ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: BC695662

[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL; GRANTING MOTION TO DEEM RFAS ADMITTED; GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION; SANCTIONS

Dept. 31

1:30 p.m.

February 25, 2020

Defendant Edson Yaner Del Cid’s Motions to Compel are Granted. Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified response to the outstanding discovery, without objections, within twenty days. Defendant’s Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted is Granted. Defendant’s Motion to Compel deposition of Plaintiff Jaqueline Joe is Granted. Defendant’s request for sanctions is granted in the reduced amount of $1,034.90. Plaintiff and her attorney of record, jointly and severally, are ordered to pay sanctions to Defendant, by and through counsel of record, in the amount of $1,034.90 within twenty days.

Defendant propounded special interrogatories, form interrogatories, RFAs, and RPDs and Plaintiff on September 30, 2019. To date, Plaintiff have not served response. Defendant therefore seeks an order compelling Plaintiff to respond, without objections, to the outstanding discovery and to pay sanctions. No opposition was filed.

Defendant’s motions to compel are granted. Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and RPDs, without objections, within twenty days. CCP §§2030.290(a),(b), 2031.300(a),(b). Defendant also moves to deem RFAs admitted. The motion is granted. CCP §2033.280(b).

On October 17, 2019, Defendant served a Notice of Deposition of Plaintiff and Request for Production of Documents. It was noticed for November 4, 2019. The deposition was eventually taken off calendar due to opposing counsel being unable to contact his client and his inability to provide alternative dates. Defendant’s counsel corresponded with Plaintiff’s counsel to set an alternative deposition date with no avail. Subsequently, on December 2, 2019, Defendant’s counsel served a second Notice of Deposition of Plaintiff and Request for Production of Documents. It was noticed for December 17, 2019. One day before the scheduled deposition date, Plaintiff’s counsel emailed Defendant’s counsel stating that he had trial on December 17, 2019. Plaintiff’s counsel requested alternative deposition dates. On December 18, 2019, Defendant’s counsel proceeded with the deposition and obtained a Certificate of Non-Appearance. Defendant therefore seeks an order compelling Plaintiff’s deposition and to pay sanctions. No opposition was filed.

The motion to compel deposition is granted.  CCP §2025.450(a).  Plaintiff’s counsel and Defense counsel are ordered to work together to schedule a time, date, and location for Plaintiff’s deposition(s).  The deposition(s) must go forward within twenty days.  If counsels are unable to resolve this issue, Defendant’s counsel may set the deposition on Defendant’s counsel’s terms with ten days’ notice to Plaintiff’s counsel (additional notice per Code if notice is by other than personal service). 

Sanctions are mandatory. CCP §§2030.290(c), 2031.300(c), 2033.280(c), 2025.450(c).  Defendant seeks sanctions in varying amounts in connection with the two motions.  The Court finds one and half hour to prepare each of these motions to compel is sufficient to compensate Defendant. No oppositions were filed; thus, no reply is needed.  The Court awards one hour to appear at the hearing on the motion.  The Court therefore awards a total of four hours of attorney time at $175/hour, or $700 in attorneys’ fees.  The Court also awards $334.90 in costs associated with the December 17, 2019 deposition. CCP §2023.030(a).  Sanctions are sought against and awarded against Plaintiff and her attorney of record, jointly and severally.

Moving party to provide notice.

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at SSCDEPT31@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.orgIf the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer JEFFRIES FRANKLIN