On 03/14/2017 JANE DOE filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against COVINA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are PETER A. HERNANDEZ, YOLANDA OROZCO, HOLLY J. FUJIE and GLORIA WHITE-BROWN. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
****4038
03/14/2017
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
PETER A. HERNANDEZ
YOLANDA OROZCO
HOLLY J. FUJIE
GLORIA WHITE-BROWN
DOE JANE
DUYNE JASON VAN
COVINA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
DOES 1 THROUGH 50
TAYLOR & RING
RING DAVID MCDONALD ESQ.
HARBER STEPHEN MARK ESQ
BAUERMEISTER LINDA S. ESQ.
HARBER STEPHEN M. ESQ
BAUERMEISTER LINDA S ESQ.
6/13/2017: DEFENDANT COVINA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
11/8/2017: CIVIL DEPOSIT
4/27/2018: DEFENDANT COVINA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ETC
5/21/2018: PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JASON VAN DUYNE'S MOTION TO QUASH PLAINTIFF'S SUBPOENA TO WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
6/1/2018: Reply
6/7/2018: Notice of Continuance
6/20/2018: DEFENDANT COVINA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION AND EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND BRIE
6/22/2018: PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT COVINA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING FOR 90 DAYS PURSUANT TO C.C.P. 437C(H) AND CONTINUE TRIAL TO A DATE T
8/1/2018: PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF BASED ON NEWLY OBTAINED FACTS TO SUPPORT PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JASON VAN DUYNE'S MOTION TO QUASH PLAINTIFF'S SUBPOENA TO WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOO
9/5/2018: Notice of Court Hearing
10/12/2018: Ex Parte Application
1/8/2019: Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice
1/8/2019: Minute Order
1/14/2019: Notice
1/15/2019: Notice
1/23/2019: Notice
5/7/2019: Reply
5/14/2019: Minute Order
at 08:30 AM in Department O, Peter A. Hernandez, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel (Sanctions) - Held - Motion Denied
Order (Tentative Ruling); Filed by Clerk
Minute Order ( (Hearing on Motion to Compel Sanctions)); Filed by Clerk
Order (Tentative Ruling); Filed by Clerk
at 08:30 AM in Department J, Gloria White-Brown, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment - Not Held - Rescheduled by Court
at 08:30 AM in Department O, Peter A. Hernandez, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment - Not Held - Rescheduled by Party
Reply (in Support of its Motion for Order to Compel Plaintiff to Pay Deposition Witness Fee); Filed by Covina Valley Unified School District (Defendant)
Objection (to Evidence Cited by Plaintiff in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Order to Compel Plaintiff to Pay Deposition Witness Fee); Filed by Covina Valley Unified School District (Defendant)
Opposition (to Defendant CVUSD's Motion to Compel Deposition Witness Fee); Filed by Jane Doe (Plaintiff)
Separate Statement; Filed by Covina Valley Unified School District (Defendant)
Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Jane Doe (Plaintiff)
PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS & COMPLAINT
Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Jane Doe (Plaintiff)
PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS & COMPLAINT
Complaint
COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURIES AND DAMAGES ARISING FROM CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ABUSE
Complaint; Filed by Jane Doe (Plaintiff)
SUMMONS
Case Number: BC654038 Hearing Date: November 27, 2019 Dept: O
Defendant Covina Valley Unified School District’s motion to compel the deposition of Plaintiff’s mother, Linda S., is CONTINUED to December 20, 2019.
Defendant Covina Valley Unified School District (“Defendant”) moves to compel Plaintiff’s mother, Linda S. (“Linda S.”) to appear and testify at deposition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.450.
If, after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party, or a person designated by an organization that is a party under Section 2025.230, without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any document or tangible thing described in the deposition notice, the party giving the notice may move for an order compelling the deponent's attendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of any document or tangible thing described in the deposition notice. (CCP § 2025.450(a).) The motion shall set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the production for inspection of any document or tangible thing described in the deposition notice; and shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040, or, when the deponent fails to attend the deposition and produce the documents or things described in the deposition notice, by a declaration stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance. (CCP § 2025.450(b).)
Defendant contends that it has been attempting to take the deposition of Linda S. for about a year, but the deposition has been cancelled and rescheduled numerous times. (See Declaration of Arseneaux Evenstad ¶¶ 3-12.) Plaintiff contends that the cancelling and rescheduling of the depositions were mostly due to Defendant’s actions, and that the deposition has already been rescheduled to December 17, 2019, but Defendant refuses to take this motion off calendar. (See Declaration of Natalie Weatherford ¶¶ 9, 12-15.) Defendant further stated in its Reply that it had offered to take this motion off calendar if Plaintiff’s attorney produced the witness for her deposition prior to the date of the hearing of this motion, but the offer was refused. (Reply, 2:18-20.)
Given that the deposition has been re-scheduled by the parties, it is unclear what Defendant is requesting as relief. Thus, the motion is CONTINUED to December 20, 2019.