On 01/16/2018 a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury case was filed by IVAN LAUREANO against DOLLAR TREE STORES INC in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California.
****8851
01/16/2018
Disposed - Dismissed
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH
FELIX MARY
LAUREANO IVAN
DOES 1 TO 25
DOLLAR TREE STORES INC
LAUREANO IVAN
7/18/2019: Certificate of Mailing for
7/18/2019: Minute Order
7/18/2019: Order - Dismissal
5/1/2019: Minute Order
5/1/2019: Certificate of Mailing for
5/1/2019: Notice of Settlement
5/1/2019: Notice of Settlement
1/30/2018: APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD L1TEM?CIVIL
2/16/2018: SUMMONS
9/7/2018: ORDER FOR REMAND
6/25/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
7/11/2018: ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
7/11/2018: DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
7/20/2018: NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY AND SUPERIOR COURT OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT
1/16/2018: COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)
1/30/2018: APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM?CIVIL EX PARTE
at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (Settlement) ((Conditional)) - Not Held - Vacated by Court
Order - Dismissal; Filed by Clerk
Minute Order ( (Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (Settlement) (Conditional))); Filed by Clerk
Certificate of Mailing for ((Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (Settlement) (Conditional)) of 07/18/2019); Filed by Clerk
at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated
at 10:00 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated
at 3:46 PM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Non-Appearance Case Review
Notice of Settlement; Filed by Dollar Tree Stores, Inc (Defendant)
Minute Order ( (Non-Appearance Case Review Re Notice of Settlement)); Filed by Clerk
Notice of Settlement; Filed by Ivan Laureano (Plaintiff)
Summons Issued; Filed by Clerk
APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD L1TEM CIVIL
APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM CIVIL EX PARTE
Application ; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner
STATEMENT OF DAMAGES [C.C.P. 425.11]
Complaint; Filed by null
COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)
COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)
STATEMENT OF DAMAGES (C.C.P. 425.11J
Statement of Decision; Filed by Ivan Laureano (Plaintiff)
Case Number: BC688851 Hearing Date: November 08, 2019 Dept: 5
|
ivan laureano, Plaintiff, v.
dollar tree stores inc., Defendant.
|
Case No.: BC688851
[TENTATIVE] order RE: petition to approve compromise of pending action |
The Petition to approve the compromise of this pending action by Petitioner Mary Felix (“Petitioner”) on behalf of Claimant Ivan Laureano (“Claimant”) is continued to afford Petitioner an opportunity to correct the following issues:
1. In Section 5(a) of the petition, Petitioner states that Claimant’s claim is not the subject of a pending action. That is incorrect.
2. In Section 9 of the petition, Petitioner represents that Claimant underwent significant medical treatment because of the accident at issue. However, Petitioner has not included any medical expenses in Section 14 of the petition. Then, in Section 18(b) of the petition, Petitioner seeks approval to deduct $2,430.63 in medical expenses from the settlement. These discrepancies must be corrected.
3. In Section 15(b) of the petition, Petitioner asks the Court to approve a litigation cost for the delivery of chambers copies to the United States District Court. This appears to be in error, as this case is not pending in federal court.
4. In Section 17 of the petition, Petitioner states that Claimant is to receive $5,500 in proceeds from the settlement, but in Section 18(f) of the petition, Petitioner states that Claimant is to receive $2,430.63 in proceeds.
5. In Section 19(b) of the petition, Petitioner indicates that Claimant’s counsel expects to receive attorneys’ fees from another party to this litigation, but has not otherwise completed that section.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
The Court previously continued this matter to afford Petitioner an opportunity to correct these deficiencies, but no corrections have been made. Therefore, the Court denies the motion without prejudice. Petitioner shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.
DATED: November 8, 2019 ___________________________
Stephen I. Goorvitch
Judge of the Superior Court