Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 05/25/2019 at 03:32:16 (UTC).

HERIBERTO GALICIA LOPEZ VS EAGLE CONTRACTING INC ET AL

Case Summary

On 05/24/2017 HERIBERTO GALICIA LOPEZ filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against EAGLE CONTRACTING INC. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is GEORGINA T. RIZK. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****2546

  • Filing Date:

    05/24/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

GEORGINA T. RIZK

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

LOPEZ HERIBERTO GALICIA

Defendants, Respondents, Cross Plaintiffs and Cross Defendants

EAGLE CONTRACTING INC.

DOES 1 TO 50

GLENDALE I MALL ASSOCIATES LP

GGP INC.

INTERSTATE CONCRETE CUTTING INC.

VELOX CONSTRUCTION INC. DOE 3

FULCRUM CONSTRUCTION INC. DOE 2

EAGLE CONTRACTING ET AL

MOES 1 THROUGH 50 INCLUSIVE

P&E CONSTRUCTION INC.

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

SALEH HUSSIN ESQ.

SALEH HUSSEIN HUSNI ESQ.

Defendant and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys

MEYERS MCCONNELL REISZ SIDERMAN

CHERMELA JASON RYAN ESQ.

SIDERMAN LORI ELLEN ESQ.

Cross Defendant Attorneys

KAUFMAN JEFFREY S ESQ.

REINHOLTZ JACK R ESQ.

WEINSTEIN MARK ALAN ESQ.

 

Court Documents

NOTICE OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT BETWEEN DEFENDANT EAGLE CONTRACTING INC.;AND ETC.

8/14/2018: NOTICE OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT BETWEEN DEFENDANT EAGLE CONTRACTING INC.;AND ETC.

Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement

8/14/2018: Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement

CROSS COMPLAINT FOR INDEMIFICATION APPORTIONMENT OF FAULT DECLARATORY RELIEF AND EXPRESS INDEMNITY

9/21/2018: CROSS COMPLAINT FOR INDEMIFICATION APPORTIONMENT OF FAULT DECLARATORY RELIEF AND EXPRESS INDEMNITY

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

9/21/2018: ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Order

10/15/2018: Order

Minute Order

10/15/2018: Minute Order

Proof of Personal Service

10/17/2018: Proof of Personal Service

Answer

10/24/2018: Answer

Notice of Ruling

10/26/2018: Notice of Ruling

Notice

1/11/2019: Notice

Answer

1/29/2019: Answer

Declaration

2/27/2019: Declaration

Minute Order

3/1/2019: Minute Order

Unknown

3/1/2019: Unknown

Request for Dismissal

4/16/2019: Request for Dismissal

AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

7/17/2018: AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

10/10/2017: AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

SUMMONS

5/24/2017: SUMMONS

48 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 04/18/2019
  • Request for Dismissal; Filed by Heriberto Galicia Lopez (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/16/2019
  • Request for Dismissal; Filed by Eagle Contracting, Inc. (Cross-Complainant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/02/2019
  • Order (Proposed Order Determining Good Faith Settlement Between Eagle Contracting and Plaintiff); Filed by Eagle Contracting, Inc. (Legacy Party)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2019
  • at 11:00 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Party

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/06/2019
  • at 1:30 PM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Challenge the Good Faith of a Settlement (CCP 877.6) - Held - Motion Denied

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/06/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Hearing on Motion to Challenge the Good Faith of a Settlement...)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/01/2019
  • at 11:00 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/01/2019
  • Informal Discovery Conference Form for Personal Injury Courts; Filed by Interstate Concrete Cutting, Inc. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/01/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Informal Discovery Conference (IDC))); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/28/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 2, Georgina T. Rizk, Presiding; Court Order

    Read MoreRead Less
68 More Docket Entries
  • 08/10/2017
  • EAGLE CONTRACTING, INC.'S CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR: (1) EQUITABLE INDEMNIFICATION; ETC

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/10/2017
  • ANSWER OF EAGLE CONTRACTING, INC. TO COMPLAINT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/10/2017
  • Summons; Filed by Eagle Contracting, Inc. (Legacy Party)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/10/2017
  • Cross-Complaint; Filed by Eagle Contracting, Inc. (Legacy Party)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/10/2017
  • Answer; Filed by Eagle Contracting, Inc. (Legacy Party)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/20/2017
  • PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/20/2017
  • Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Heriberto Galicia Lopez (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/24/2017
  • Complaint; Filed by Heriberto Galicia Lopez (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/24/2017
  • SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/24/2017
  • COMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC662546    Hearing Date: June 23, 2020    Dept: A

The Superior Court is re-opening under “Here for You | Safe for You” Conditions and Orders

Counsel are urged to use remote appearance technology such as Court Call or LACourtConnect )(when it becomes available on August 6 for Branch Civil)

If it is indispensable for counsel to be present in court, face masks are mandated (unless a court orders otherwise) and social distancing rules are in force.

Lopez v Eagle Contracting

Motion for Protective Order

Calendar:

11

Case No.:

BC662546

Hearing Date:

June 23, 2020

Action Filed:

May 24, 2017

Trial Date:

June 15, 2020

MP:

Plaintiff Heriberto Galicia Lopez

RP:

Defendant Fulcrum Construction, Inc.

ALLEGATIONS:

The instant action arises from a slip and fall suffered by Plaintiff Heriberto Galicia Lopez (“Plaintiff”) at 100 West Broadway, Glendale, CA 91210 (the “Property”) on or about June 13, 2015. Plaintiff alleges that the cause of the slip and fall was liquid located on the floor of the Property, which Defendants Eagle Contracting Inc. (“Eagle”); Glendale I Mall Associates, LP (“Glendale Mall”); Interstate Concrete Cutting, Inc. (“Interstate”, formerly Doe 1); Fulcrum Construction, Inc. (“Fulcrum”, formerly Doe 2); and Velox Construction, Inc. (“Velox”, formerly Doe 3, and collectively the “Defendants”) were allegedly responsible for maintaining.

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on May 24, 2017, alleging two causes of action sounding in (1) Negligence, and (2) Premises Liability.

Fulcrum filed a Cross-Complaint (“FXC”) on September 21, 2018, alleging that Eagle, Interstate, Velox, and Cross-Defendant P&E Construction, Inc. (“PEC” or “Cross-Defendant”) are liable on theories of (1) Indemnification, (2) Apportionment of Fault, (3) Declaratory Relief, and (4) Express Indemnity.

Eagle filed a Cross-Complaint (“EXC”) on October 24, 2018, alleging that Fulcrum, PEC, and Interstate are liable to it on theories of (1) Equitable Indemnification, (2) Apportionment & Contribution, and (3) Declaratory Relief.

Velox filed its own Cross-Complaint (“VXC”) on February 01, 2019, alleging that unknown cross-defendants are liable to it under theories of (1) Indemnity, (2) Contribution, and (3) Declaratory Relief.

PRESENTATION:

The instant motion was filed by Plaintiff on February 26, 2020. Defendant filed opposition on March 09, 2020, and a reply brief was received on March 13, 2020. Oral arguments were originally scheduled for March 20, 2020.

On March 18, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and pursuant to the March 17, 2020, Administrative Order of the Presiding Judge, the Court continued the instant motion to April 17, 2020, with no change in the briefing schedule. Counsel for Plaintiff was informed telephonically, and directed to give notice.

On March 25, 2020, and in response to the continuing pandemic conditions, the Court continued the matter again, setting the motion for hearing on May 22, 2020. Counsel for Plaintiff was informed and directed to give notice, and a copy of the minute order was mailed to counsel.

On April 21, 2020, with the continuing pandemic conditions, the Court rescheduled the hearing date to June 23, 2020. Counsel for Plaintiff was informed and directed to give notice, and a copy of the minute order was mailed to counsel.

RELIEF REQUESTED:

Plaintiff moves for a protective order regarding Plaintiff’s deposition.

DISCUSSION:

Service – As an initial matter, the Court notes that the proofs of service filed with the Plaintiff’s moving papers fail to indicate any method of service. As such, the proofs of service are defective on their face.

Notice – On the Court’s review of Plaintiff’s notice of motion the Court is challenged to identify the relief sought under the four corners of the notice. In the notice, Plaintiff moves for “an order granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order under California Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.420(b) that the deposition of Plaintiff be taken at a place other than that specified in the deposition notice.” Plaintiff fails to request where, if anywhere, they want the deposition to occur, and fail to indicate where the current deposition in noticed for the Plaintiff. Further, to the extent that Plaintiff is seeking relief under one of the 16 subsections of Code of Civ. Proc. §2025.420(b), the relevant subsection, subsection 4, requires that the moving part indicate that the new location “is within a distance permitted by Sections 2025.250 and 2025.260.” Which Plaintiff has not done, and thereby deprived Defendant the opportunity to oppose the motion on that statutory basis.

Based on these defects to service and notice, the Court could deny the instant motion without prejudice to filing a new motion for protective order that cures the instant defects.

Mootness – The Court, however, notes that the instant motion is mooted pursuant the April 06, 2020, Emergency Rule of Court, Rule 11, promulgated by the Judicial Council of California, which provides that “Notwithstanding any other law, including the Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.310(a) and (b), and rule 3.1010(c) and (d), a party or nonparty deponent, at their election or the election of the deposing party, is not required to be present with the deposition officer at the time of the deposition.”

Should the parties be incapable of finalizing Plaintiff’s deposition prior to the sunset of the Emergency Rule (90 days following the expiration of the Governor’s State of Emergency Declaration), then the parties may petition the Court for further relief at that time.

Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion without prejudice.

---

RULING: below,

In the event the parties submit on this tentative ruling, or a party requests a signed order or the court in its discretion elects to sign a formal order, the following form will be either electronically signed or signed in hard copy and entered into the court’s records.

ORDER

Plaintiff Heriberto Galicia Lopez’s Motion for Protective Order came on regularly for hearing on June 23, 2020, with appearances/submissions as noted in the minute order for said hearing, and the court, being fully advised in the premises, did then and there rule as follows:

THE MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOTED BY THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA’S APRIL 06, 2020 EMERGENCY RULE 11.

DATE: _______________ _______________________________

JUDGE

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where P&E Construction, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases where INTERSTATE CONCRETE CUTTING INC is a litigant

Latest cases where GGP INC A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AKA GLENDALE GALLERIA is a litigant

Latest cases where GLENDALE I MALL ASSOCIATES LP A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AKA GLENDALE GALLERIA is a litigant