HAYLEEN PORTILLO VS SHAILYN MARIE RAMOS HANACEK ET AL
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****4440
-
Filing Date:
09/01/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judge
JON R. TAKASUGI
Party Details
Plaintiff
PORTILLO HAYLEEN
Defendants
HANACEK MARK
HANCEK SHAILYN MARIE RAMOS
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Petitioner and Plaintiff Attorney
BRAL S. SEAN ESQ.
Defendant Attorney
PRZYBYLOWSKI CHRISTIAN X.
Court Documents
9/1/2017: COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. NEGLIGENCE
9/1/2017: SUMMONS
6/6/2019: Notice of Ruling
5/31/2019: Minute Order
5/8/2019: Motion to Continue Trial Date
2/14/2019: Stipulation and Order
8/24/2018: DIFENDANTS SHAWYN MARIE RAMOS HANACEK AND MARK HANACEK'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF HAYLEEN PORTILLOS COMPLAINT
8/24/2018: DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
Docket Entries
- 06/06/2019
-
DocketNotice of Ruling; Filed by SHAILYN MARIE RAMOS HANCEK (Defendant); MARK HANACEK (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 05/31/2019
-
Docketat 1:30 PM in Department 3, Jon R. Takasugi, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial (Date and Reset all Related Cutoff Dates Based in the New Trial Date) - Held
[-] Read Less
- 05/31/2019
-
DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial Date and Reset all Relate...)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 05/08/2019
-
DocketMotion to Continue Trial Date; Filed by SHAILYN MARIE RAMOS HANCEK (Defendant); MARK HANACEK (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 03/01/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 3, Jon R. Takasugi, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
[-] Read Less
- 02/15/2019
-
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 3, Jon R. Takasugi, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
[-] Read Less
- 02/14/2019
-
DocketStipulation and Order (PROPOSED ORDER & STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL); Filed by SHAILYN MARIE RAMOS HANCEK (Defendant); MARK HANACEK (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 08/24/2018
-
DocketDIFENDANTS SHAWYN MARIE RAMOS HANACEK AND MARK HANACEK'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF HAYLEEN PORTILLOS COMPLAINT
[-] Read Less
- 08/24/2018
-
DocketDEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
[-] Read Less
- 08/24/2018
-
DocketAnswer; Filed by SHAILYN MARIE RAMOS HANCEK (Defendant); MARK HANACEK (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 08/24/2018
-
DocketDemand for Jury Trial; Filed by SHAILYN MARIE RAMOS HANCEK (Defendant); MARK HANACEK (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 09/01/2017
-
DocketSUMMONS
[-] Read Less
- 09/01/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by HAYLEEN PORTILLO (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 09/01/2017
-
DocketCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. NEGLIGENCE
[-] Read Less
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: ****4440 Hearing Date: January 14, 2020 Dept: 31
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
| HAYLEEN PORTILLO, Plaintiff(s), vs. SHAILYN MARIE RAMOS HANACEK, ET AL., Defendant(s). | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | CASE NO: ****4440 [TENTATIVE] ORDER TAKING MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE OFF CALENDAR Dept. 3 1:30 p.m. January 14, 2020 |
Defendants filed this motion to continue trial on 12/19/19 and set it for hearing on 1/14/20. Defendants seek an order continuing the trial in this action to 5/12/20. On 12/20/19, Defendants made an ex parte application to continue the trial date, which the Court granted; trial is now scheduled for 5/12/20. The motion to continue trial is moot, but Defendants have not taken it off calendar. The Court asks Defense Counsel to promptly take matters off calendar in this and other actions when matters become moot, as this will reduce the need to expend judicial resources reviewing matters that are no longer at issue. The Court takes the motion to continue the trial date off calendar as moot at this time.
Defendants are ordered to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at sscdept3@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar. If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases