Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 06/02/2019 at 00:10:04 (UTC).

FRANCISCO CORONA, ET AL. VS. RAMON BUENO

Case Summary

On 07/31/2017 FRANCISCO CORONA filed a Property - Other Real Property lawsuit against RAMON BUENO. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Compton Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are BRIAN S. CURREY and MAURICE A. LEITER. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****8862

  • Filing Date:

    07/31/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Property - Other Real Property

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Compton Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

BRIAN S. CURREY

MAURICE A. LEITER

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

CORONA FRANCISCO

CORONA KIMBERLY

Defendants

BUENO PROPERTIES L.L.C.

DOES 1-30

BUENO RAMON

YAXKIN "RONY" VELASQUEZ

GREEN APPLE ESCROW INC.

PACIFIC ESCROW INC.

HERNANDEZ GEORGINA

HERNANDEZ HUGO

VELASQUEZ YAXKIN "RONY" AKA RONY VELASQUEZ

Other

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

KAREY BRUCE LOREN

Defendant Attorneys

DOLAN ROBERT T.

LANPHERE MICHAEL A.

DIERINGER JON A.

KERN MARLENE E.

KERN MARLENE ELISABETH

DOLAN ROBERT TRACEY

DIERINGER JON ANTHONY

 

Court Documents

Complaint

7/31/2017: Complaint

Notice of Case Management Conference

7/31/2017: Notice of Case Management Conference

Unknown

11/27/2017: Unknown

Minute Order

1/4/2018: Minute Order

Case Management Statement

1/4/2018: Case Management Statement

Unknown

1/4/2018: Unknown

Unknown

1/8/2018: Unknown

Minute Order

1/16/2018: Minute Order

Notice of Ruling

1/17/2018: Notice of Ruling

Unknown

3/19/2018: Unknown

Minute Order

4/10/2018: Minute Order

Unknown

5/9/2018: Unknown

Unknown

5/21/2018: Unknown

Case Management Statement

7/10/2018: Case Management Statement

Unknown

7/18/2018: Unknown

Minute Order

7/31/2018: Minute Order

Minute Order

11/15/2018: Minute Order

Minute Order

1/18/2019: Minute Order

67 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 01/28/2019
  • Notice of Deposit - Jury; Filed by PACIFIC ESCROW INC. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/18/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department A, Maurice A. Leiter, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: (Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute) - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/18/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department A, Maurice A. Leiter, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: (Sanctions Against Plaintiff Counsel for Failure to Appear on November 15, 2018) - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/18/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department A, Maurice A. Leiter, Presiding; Case Management Conference - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/18/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Case Management Conference; Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal...)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/17/2019
  • Answer; Filed by BUENO PROPERTIES, L.L.C. (Defendant); RAMON BUENO (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/17/2019
  • Case Management Statement; Filed by RAMON BUENO (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/02/2019
  • Case Management Statement; Filed by FRANCISCO CORONA (Plaintiff); KIMBERLY CORONA (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/02/2019
  • Declaration (PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEY BRUCE LOREN KAREY's DECLARTORY RESPONSE TO THE COURT's OSC RE SANCTIONS RE PRIOR C.M.C. ON 11-16-2018.); Filed by FRANCISCO CORONA (Plaintiff); KIMBERLY CORONA (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/10/2018
  • Declaration of Michael A. Lanphere in Support of Monetary Sanctions Against the Plaintiffs; Filed by PACIFIC ESCROW INC. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
76 More Docket Entries
  • 10/26/2017
  • Answer to First Amended Complaint; Filed by YAXKIN "RONY" VELASQUEZ (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/24/2017
  • Declaration; Filed by RAMON BUENO (Defendant); BUENO PROPERTIES, L.L.C. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/23/2017
  • Declaration; Filed by GREEN APPLE ESCROW, INC. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/23/2017
  • Answer to First Amended Complaint; Filed by PACIFIC ESCROW INC. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/23/2017
  • Summons Issued; Filed by FRANCISCO CORONA (Plaintiff); KIMBERLY CORONA (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/23/2017
  • First Amended Complaint; Filed by FRANCISCO CORONA (Plaintiff); KIMBERLY CORONA (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/31/2017
  • Notice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/31/2017
  • Summons; Filed by null

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/31/2017
  • Civil Case Cover Sheet; Filed by FRANCISCO CORONA (Plaintiff); KIMBERLY CORONA (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/31/2017
  • Complaint; Filed by FRANCISCO CORONA (Plaintiff); KIMBERLY CORONA (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: TC028862    Hearing Date: March 18, 2021    Dept: A

Corona v. Bueno

The unopposed Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs, Francis Corona and Kimberly Corona, is GRANTED. Counsel has complied with California Rules of Court 3.1362. The order is effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the order on the Plaintiffs. Until then, counsel remains counsel of record.

On 2/18/21, the court continued this hearing to 3/18/21, to permit the Plaintiffs and their counsel to meet and confer to resolve the issues. In a supplemental declaration filed 3/1/21, counsel attests that he has contacted Plaintiff, Kimberly Corona, who resides with her father, Plaintiff, Francis Corona, on three occasions and left voicemail. Plaintiffs do not cooperate.

Counsel is ordered to submit a proposed order forthwith.

Moving party is ordered to give notice.

Case Number: TC028862    Hearing Date: February 18, 2021    Dept: A

Corona v. Bueno TC028862

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is CONTINUED to April 6, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. The court finds that counsel has failed to provide sufficient evidence that counsel complied with California Rule of Court Rule 3.1362. Counsel’s declaration states that Plaintiff’s address “is the mailing address we have on file and our mail has been successfully delivered.” It is unclear, however, whether counsel had determined that mail was successfully delivered to that address within the past 30 days. Counsel has also not provided proof that the moving papers were served on other parties to the litigation. Finally, counsel has failed to file a proposed order (MC-053).

The court continues the motion so that these deficiencies may be corrected.

Moving party is ordered to give notice. Notice of the new hearing date must be provided to Plaintiff in the manner required under Rule 1.362.

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer KAREY BRUCE LOREN