This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 08/13/2018 at 06:25:11 (UTC).

FORA FINANCIAL WEST LLC VS JERZAN TORREZ

Case Summary

On 09/12/2017 FORA FINANCIAL WEST LLC filed a Contract - Debt Collection lawsuit against JERZAN TORREZ. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Pomona Courthouse South located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is DUKES, ROBERT A.. The case status is Disposed - Judgment Entered.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****9610

  • Filing Date:

    09/12/2017

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Judgment Entered

  • Case Type:

    Contract - Debt Collection

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Pomona Courthouse South

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

DUKES, ROBERT A.

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

FORA FINANCIAL WEST LLC

Defendants

E&J GENRAL BUILDING CONTRACTORS

TORREZ JERZAN

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

KATZ STUART

KATZ STUART A. LAW OFFICES OF

Defendant Attorney

BEAUDRY ESQ. STEPHANIE L.

 

Court Documents

Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default Judgment

7/23/2018: Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default Judgment

 

Docket Entries

  • 07/24/2018
  • at 08:30 am in Department O, Dukes, Robert A., Presiding; Judgment Debtors Examination (C/F 6-14-18+BODY ATTACHMENT HELD FROM 6-14-18) - Matter continued

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/23/2018
  • Notice of Application; Filed by Attorney for Defendant

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/25/2018
  • Notice of Continuance; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/14/2018
  • at 08:30 am in Department O, Dukes, Robert A., Presiding; Judgment Debtors Examination - Matter continued

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/30/2018
  • Rtn of Service of Summons & Compl; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/25/2018
  • Writ-Other (ISSUED TO LA CO ); Filed by Judgment Creditor

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/25/2018
  • Abstract of Judgment; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/04/2018
  • Notice of Application (ORAP ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/26/2018
  • at 08:30 am in Department O, Dukes, Robert A., Presiding; OSC-Failure to File Default Judg - Judgment granted

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/26/2018
  • Declaration (OF JOHN COSCIA IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CCP SECTION 585 (d) ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
1 More Docket Entries
  • 03/26/2018
  • Dismissal of Does (RE: DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, ONLY ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/26/2018
  • Judgment (BY COURT BY DEFAULT ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/22/2018
  • at 08:30 am in Department O, Dukes, Robert A., Presiding; Conference-Case Management - Completed

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/10/2018
  • Statement-Case Management; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/10/2018
  • Notice of Change of Address; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/04/2017
  • Default Entered (COURT JUDGMENT SENT TO DEPT O W/O FILE ON 1/24/18 (HRG 3/26/18) ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/24/2017
  • Notice (OF CMC ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/24/2017
  • Rtn of Service of Summons & Compl; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/18/2017
  • Notice-Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/12/2017
  • Complaint Filed

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: KC069610    Hearing Date: November 13, 2019    Dept: O

Plaintiff's application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons:

  1. No entry of default.

  2. No dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP section 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment: Lack of dismissal of Doe defendants.