FELIPE A REYES VS JEREME ARMON WARE
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****4817
-
Filing Date:
09/05/2017
-
Case Status:
Disposed - Judgment Entered
-
Case Type:
Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judges
MICHAEL E. WHITAKER
FREDERICK C. SHALLER
Party Details
Plaintiff
REYES FELIPE A.
Defendant
WARE JEREME ARMON
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorney
BERMAN MARTIN RAY
Court Documents
12/6/2021: Judgment
12/6/2021: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO ENTER DEFAUL...)
12/2/2021: Declaration Pursuant to 585 CCP in Support of Default Judgment
12/2/2021: Declaration Pursuant to 585 CCP in Support of Default Judgment
12/2/2021: Declaration Pursuant to 585 CCP in Support of Default Judgment
12/2/2021: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment
11/4/2021: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO ENTER DEFAUL...)
10/18/2021: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO ENTER DEFAUL...)
10/18/2021: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment
10/15/2021: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment
10/15/2021: Declaration - DECLARATION DECLARATION OF FELIPE A. REYES RE: REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
10/15/2021: Declaration - DECLARATION DECLARATION OF MARTIN R. BERMAN RE: DEFAULT JUDGMENT
8/30/2021: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO SERVE/ FILE ...)
8/24/2021: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment
7/6/2021: Proof of Publication
6/4/2021: Order for Publication - ORDER FOR PUBLICATION FOR JEREME
5/27/2021: Application for Publication
5/27/2021: Declaration - DECLARATION DECLARATION OF EDGAR PACHECO IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR PUBLICATION
Docket Entries
- 12/07/2021
-
DocketDefault judgment by Court entered for Plaintiff Reyes, Felipe A. against Defendant Ware, Jereme Armon on the Complaint filed by FELIPE A REYES on 09/05/2017 for damages of $30,325.00 and costs of $1,159.70 for a total of $31,484.70.
[-] Read Less
- 12/06/2021
-
DocketJudgment; Signed and Filed by: Felipe A. Reyes (Plaintiff); As to: Jereme Armon Ware (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 12/06/2021
-
DocketMinute Order (Order to Show Cause Re: dismissal for failure to enter defaul...)
[-] Read Less
- 12/06/2021
-
DocketOrder to Show Cause Re: dismissal for failure to enter default judgment scheduled for 12/06/2021 at 08:30 AM in Spring Street Courthouse at Department 32 updated: Result Date to 12/06/2021; Result Type to Held
[-] Read Less
- 12/02/2021
-
DocketRequest for Entry of Default / Judgment; Filed by: Felipe A. Reyes (Plaintiff); As to: Jereme Armon Ware (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 12/02/2021
-
DocketDeclaration Pursuant to 585 CCP in Support of Default Judgment; Filed by: Felipe A. Reyes (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 12/02/2021
-
DocketDeclaration Pursuant to 585 CCP in Support of Default Judgment; Filed by: Felipe A. Reyes (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 12/02/2021
-
DocketDeclaration Pursuant to 585 CCP in Support of Default Judgment; Filed by: Felipe A. Reyes (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 12/02/2021
-
DocketDefault entered as to Jereme Armon Ware; On the Complaint filed by FELIPE A REYES on 09/05/2017
[-] Read Less
- 11/04/2021
-
DocketOrder to Show Cause Re: dismissal for failure to enter default judgment scheduled for 12/06/2021 at 08:30 AM in Spring Street Courthouse at Department 32
[-] Read Less
- 02/19/2019
-
DocketOn the Court's own motion, Legacy Event Type : OSC RE Dismissal scheduled for 09/08/2020 at 08:30 AM in Spring Street Courthouse at Department 5 Not Held - Advanced and Vacated on 02/19/2019
[-] Read Less
- 02/19/2019
-
DocketOrder to Show Cause Re: Failure to File Proof of Service and Failure to File Default Judgment Pursuant to CRC 3.740 scheduled for 05/31/2019 at 08:30 AM in Spring Street Courthouse at Department 5
[-] Read Less
- 02/19/2019
-
DocketMinute Order (Final Status Conference)
[-] Read Less
- 12/07/2018
-
DocketCase reassigned to Spring Street Courthouse in Department 5 - Hon. Stephen I. Goorvitch; Reason: Inventory Transfer
[-] Read Less
- 09/29/2017
-
DocketDocument:Summons Filed Filed by: Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
[-] Read Less
- 09/06/2017
-
DocketCalendaring:Final Status Conference 02/19/19 at 10:00 am Benny C. Osorio
[-] Read Less
- 09/06/2017
-
DocketCalendaring:Jury Trial 03/05/19 at 8:30 am Benny C. Osorio
[-] Read Less
- 09/06/2017
-
DocketCalendaring:OSC RE Dismissal 09/08/20 at 8:30 am Benny C. Osorio
[-] Read Less
- 09/05/2017
-
DocketCase Filed/Opened:Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD
[-] Read Less
- 09/05/2017
-
DocketDocument:Complaint Filed by: N/A
[-] Read Less
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: ****4817 Hearing Date: February 26, 2021 Dept: 32
At the hearing of January 15, 2021, Plaintiff’s counsel requested an opportunity to brief the issue whether the three-year service rule applies to this case, given that it was dismissed for some period of time. The Court granted the request and ordered that Plaintiff may file a brief addressing the issues raised in the tentative ruling on or before February 18, 2021. Pursuant to the request of plaintiff, the Hearing on Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Dismissal (CCP 473) scheduled for 01/15/2021 was continued to 02/26/2021 at 01:30 PM in Department 32 at Spring Street Courthouse.
As of February 26, Plaintiff did not file a brief addressing the issues raised in the tentative ruling. Therefore, the tentative ruling issued on January 15, 2021 is adopted as the order of the court. The Clerk is to provide notice.
Case Number: ****4817 Hearing Date: January 15, 2021 Dept: 32
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
Department 32
|
paolo pasio,
Plaintiff, v.
denise duross,
Defendant.
|
Case No.: 19STCV02295
Hearing Date: January 15, 2021
[TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to compel deposition
|
Defendant Denise Duross (“Defendant”) moves to compel Plaintiff Paolo Pasio (“Plaintiff”) to appear for deposition. Per Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.450, if a party to the action fails to appear for deposition after service of a deposition notice and the party has not served a valid objection to that deposition notice, the party that noticed the deposition may move for an order to compel the deponent to attend and testify at deposition. (Code Civ. Proc., ;2025.450, subd. (a).) Defendant has the right to take Plaintiff’s deposition and is entitled to take Plaintiff’s deposition without leave of court at any time. (See Code Civ. Proc., ; 2025.210, subd. (a).) Plaintiff concedes that he must appear for deposition. Accordingly, the motion to compel deposition is granted.
The Court declines to award sanctions to either party. Both parties have failed cooperate sufficiently to schedule basic discovery. For this reason, the Court concludes that an award of sanctions to either side would be unjust. (Code Civ. Proc., ; 2025.450, subd. (g)(1).)
Based upon the foregoing, the Court grants Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s deposition. The deposition shall occur within thirty (30) days of notice of this order unless the parties stipulate to a different date. The deposition may occur remotely unless all parties involved agree to an in-person deposition. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.
DATED: January 15, 2021 ___________________________
Stephen I. Goorvitch
Judge of the Superior Court
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases