FELIMON LEPE VS CASE DE CARROS
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****9071
-
Filing Date:
02/16/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Contract - Other Contract
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judges
PETER A. HERNANDEZ
DUKES, ROBERT A.
Party Details
Plaintiff
LEPE FELIMON
Defendants
CASE DE CARROS
QUALITY ACCEPTANCE LLC.
MARCHOUD AHMAD
GUTIERREZ STEVE
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE CO.
CASA DE CARROS
FAZILI FARZAD
AMERICAN ROAD LEASING INC.
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorneys
LUCENTE MARCELLA LAW OFFICES OF
LUCENTE MARCELLA
Defendant Attorneys
GELLER MICHAEL S. ESQ
GELLER MICHAEL STEVEN ESQ
FALLAT JOHN LYSTER
ELDER WILLIAM NORMAN JR
FALLAT JOHN L. LAW OFFICE OF
Court Documents
2/16/2017: Complaint
2/16/2017: Unknown
2/16/2017: Civil Case Cover Sheet
2/16/2017: Summons
2/21/2017: Notice of Case Management Conference
3/17/2017: Unknown
4/4/2017: Unknown
5/3/2017: Unknown
5/19/2017: Unknown
6/7/2017: Case Management Statement
6/12/2017: Request for Judicial Notice
6/12/2017: Request for Judicial Notice
6/12/2017: Request for Judicial Notice
6/12/2017: Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses
6/12/2017: Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses
6/12/2017: Unknown
6/12/2017: Declaration
6/12/2017: Declaration
Docket Entries
- 06/18/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department O, Peter A. Hernandez, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to be Relieved as Counsel - Held - Motion Granted
[-] Read Less
- 06/18/2019
-
DocketOrder (Ruling on the Court's Tentative Ruling); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 06/18/2019
-
DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Motion to be Relieved as Counsel;)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 06/18/2019
-
DocketOrder Granting Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel-Civil; Filed by Michael Steven Geller, ESQ (Attorney)
[-] Read Less
- 06/10/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department O, Peter A. Hernandez, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to be Relieved as Counsel - Not Held - Vacated by Court
[-] Read Less
- 05/22/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department O, Peter A. Hernandez, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel (MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTED ADMISSIONS BE DEEMED ADMITTED AGAINST FELIMON LEPE) - Not Held - Vacated by Court
[-] Read Less
- 05/22/2019
-
DocketAmended; Filed by American Road Leasing, Inc. (Defendant); Farzad Fazili (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 05/22/2019
-
DocketNotice (Notice of Errata); Filed by American Road Leasing, Inc. (Defendant); Farzad Fazili (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 05/22/2019
-
DocketDeclaration in Support of Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel-Civil; Filed by American Road Leasing, Inc. (Defendant); Farzad Fazili (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 05/21/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department O, Peter A. Hernandez, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel (MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES) - Not Held - Vacated by Court
[-] Read Less
- 03/17/2017
-
DocketDeclaration; Filed by CASA DE CARROS (Defendant)
[-] Read Less
- 02/21/2017
-
DocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 02/21/2017
-
DocketNotice-Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 02/16/2017
-
DocketNotice of Case Assignment; Filed by Court
[-] Read Less
- 02/16/2017
-
DocketNotice of Case Assignment - Unlimited Civil Case; Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 02/16/2017
-
DocketCivil Case Cover Sheet; Filed by FELIMON LEPE (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 02/16/2017
-
DocketNotice of Case Assignment; Filed by Court
[-] Read Less
- 02/16/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by FELIMON LEPE (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 02/16/2017
-
DocketComplaint Filed
[-] Read Less
- 02/16/2017
-
DocketSummons (on Complaint)
[-] Read Less
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: ****9071 Hearing Date: January 22, 2020 Dept: O
Plaintiffs’ application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons:
Relief sought is not within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.). [EXHIBIT 1 OF VEHICLE PURCHASE AGREEMENT NOT INCLUDED IN DEFAULT PACKET]
Attorney Fees requested amount not in compliance with Local R. 3.214.
No proposed form of judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(6); see Form JUD-100.)
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases