This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 11/22/2020 at 11:04:50 (UTC).

ELMER ARMANDO JACINTO PALMA ET AL VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY MET

Case Summary

On 02/03/2017 ELMER ARMANDO JACINTO PALMA filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against LOS ANGELES COUNTY MET. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are BENNY C. OSORIO, ELAINE LU, YOLANDA OROZCO, DEBORAH L. CHRISTIAN and STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Other.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****9172

  • Filing Date:

    02/03/2017

  • Case Status:

    Other

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

BENNY C. OSORIO

ELAINE LU

YOLANDA OROZCO

DEBORAH L. CHRISTIAN

STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs and Petitioners

LOCKETTE CAMILLE DIANE

PALMA ELMER ARMANDO JACINTO

Defendants, Respondents and Not Classified By Court

DOES 1 TO 25

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN

METRO

MENDEZ MARIO DANIEL BORRAYO

RUSSELL NORMAN

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney

VAZIRI SIAMAK ESQ.

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

LA FOLLETTE JOHNSON DE HAAS FESLER

PLUMA GILLIAN

 

Court Documents

Notice - NOTICE OF TAKING DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO CROSS COMPLAINANT NORMAN RUSSELL

7/21/2020: Notice - NOTICE OF TAKING DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO CROSS COMPLAINANT NORMAN RUSSELL

Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (COURT ORDER)

4/17/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (COURT ORDER)

Declaration - DECLARATION DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION

2/20/2020: Declaration - DECLARATION DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION

Notice of Ruling

6/27/2019: Notice of Ruling

Opposition - OPPOSITION DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER DEEMING MATTERS ADMITTED; DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER

6/10/2019: Opposition - OPPOSITION DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER DEEMING MATTERS ADMITTED; DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER

Motion re: - MOTION RE: MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER DEEMING MATTERS ADMITTED;

5/30/2019: Motion re: - MOTION RE: MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER DEEMING MATTERS ADMITTED;

Opposition - Opposition Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Specially set it's Motion for Summary Judgment or to Continue Trial

2/21/2019: Opposition - Opposition Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Specially set it's Motion for Summary Judgment or to Continue Trial

Reply - Reply to Defendant's Motion to Have Request for Admissions to Plaintiff Camille Lockette Deemed Admitted and Request for Monetary Sanctions

10/31/2018: Reply - Reply to Defendant's Motion to Have Request for Admissions to Plaintiff Camille Lockette Deemed Admitted and Request for Monetary Sanctions

Opposition - Opposition TO MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO ADMISSIONS

10/26/2018: Opposition - Opposition TO MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO ADMISSIONS

Order - Order Defendant's Motion To Deem Request For Admission Admitted

11/7/2018: Order - Order Defendant's Motion To Deem Request For Admission Admitted

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL AND DISCOVERY CUT OFF DATES; AND ETC.

8/21/2018: EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL AND DISCOVERY CUT OFF DATES; AND ETC.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL, FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE AND ALL STATUTORY DATES

8/21/2018: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL, FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE AND ALL STATUTORY DATES

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE REGULAR EXPERT DISCOVERY WITH NEW TRIAL

6/7/2018: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE REGULAR EXPERT DISCOVERY WITH NEW TRIAL

Minute Order -

7/9/2018: Minute Order -

Minute Order -

6/25/2018: Minute Order -

SUMMONS -

2/3/2017: SUMMONS -

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

8/29/2017: NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Minute Order -

8/29/2017: Minute Order -

39 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 07/23/2020
  • Docketat 3:30 PM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Party

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/23/2020
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/21/2020
  • DocketNotice (of Taking Defendants Demurrer to Cross Complainant Norman Russell); Filed by Los Angeles County Metropolitan (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/04/2020
  • Docketat 1:30 PM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike - Not Held - Continued - Court's Motion

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/28/2020
  • DocketNotice (of continuance of Defendant's Demurrer); Filed by Los Angeles County Metropolitan (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/17/2020
  • Docketat 08:48 AM in Department 32, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Court Order

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/17/2020
  • DocketCertificate of Mailing for ((Court Order) of 04/17/2020); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/17/2020
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Court Order)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/18/2020
  • DocketDemurrer - without Motion to Strike; Filed by Los Angeles County Metropolitan (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/20/2020
  • DocketDeclaration (DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION); Filed by Los Angeles County Metropolitan (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
57 More Docket Entries
  • 07/28/2017
  • DocketNotice of Related Cases

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/03/2017
  • DocketAnswer; Filed by Los Angeles County Metropolitan (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/03/2017
  • DocketDEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/03/2017
  • DocketDemand for Jury Trial; Filed by Los Angeles County Metropolitan (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/03/2017
  • DocketANSWER TO COMPLAINT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/16/2017
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/16/2017
  • DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/03/2017
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by Camille Diane Lockette (Plaintiff); Elmer Armando Jacinto Palma (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/03/2017
  • DocketSUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/03/2017
  • DocketCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES: GOVERNMENT CLAIM LIABILITY - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SEC. 815.2.

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC649172    Hearing Date: July 23, 2020    Dept: 32

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 32

elmer armando jacinto palma, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan transportation authority,

Defendant.

Case No.: BC649172, consolidated with

BC654567, BC646257, and

BC664475

Hearing Date: July 23, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

DEMURRER TO Cross-complaint

Background

Plaintiffs Elmer Armando Jacinto Palma and Camille Diane Lockette (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action against Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“Metro”) following a motor vehicle collision. Plaintiffs later named Defendant Norman Russell (“Russell”) via Doe amendment. Russell then filed a cross-complaint against Metro. Metro demurs to the cross-complaint, which Russell opposes. The demurrer is sustained with leave to amend.

LEGAL STANDARD

“It is black letter law that a demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the allegations in a complaint.”  (Lewis v. Safeway, Inc. (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 385, 388.)  In ruling on a demurrer, the court must “liberally construe[]” the allegations of the complaint.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 452.) “This rule of liberal construction means that the reviewing court draws inferences favorable to the plaintiff, not the defendant.”  (Perez v. Golden Empire Transit Dist. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 1228, 1238.)

DISCUSSION

Metro alleges that Russell has not alleged compliance with the claims presentation requirement. Per the Government Claims Act, a party with a claim for damages against a public entity must first file claim directly with that entity. The party may file a lawsuit only if the public entity denies or rejects the claim. (Gov. Code §§ 905, 945.4; City of Ontario v. Superior Court (1993) 12 Cal.App.4th 894.) The claims presentation requirement provides the public entity with an opportunity to evaluate the claim and decide whether to pay on the claim. (Roberts v. County of Los Angeles (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 474.) Failure to allege facts demonstrating compliance with the claims presentation requirement subjects the complaint to a general demurrer. (State of Calif. v. Superior Court (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1234, 1239.) Russell does not allege any facts in his cross-complaint regarding his compliance with the claims presentation requirement.

Conclusion and Order

Metro’s demurrer is sustained with leave to amend. Russell may file an amended cross-complaint within ten (10) days of notice. Metro shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: July 23, 2020 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court