EDUARDO RAMIREZ VS GLOVA LINK CORPORATION ET AL
Case Summary
On 09/22/2017 EDUARDO RAMIREZ filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against GLOVA LINK CORPORATION. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are JON R. TAKASUGI, HOLLY E. KENDIG and THOMAS D. LONG. The case status is Other.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****6775
-
Filing Date:
09/22/2017
-
Case Status:
Other
-
Court:
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
-
Courthouse:
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judges
JON R. TAKASUGI
HOLLY E. KENDIG
THOMAS D. LONG
Party Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner
RAMIREZ EDUARDO
Defendants and Respondents
DOES 1 TO 20
SERGIO VILLAMEDRANO
GLOVA LINK CORPORATION
VILLAMEDRANO SERGIO
GLOVA-LINK CORPORATION
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys
LAW OFFICES OF BRANDON SUA & ASSOCIATES
O'CONNOR MICHAEL P.
Defendant and Respondent Attorneys
DEGRAVE DOUGLAS M.
DEGRAVE DOUGLAS MICHAEL
Court Documents
1/13/2020: Opposition - OPPOSITION PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO EXCLUDE TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT CONCLUSIONS OF LIABILITY AND WITNESS STATEMENTS
1/14/2020: Opposition - OPPOSITION PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7 TO PRECLUDE CASE-SPECIFIC HEARSAY STATEMENTS PURSUANT TO PEOPLE V. SANCHEZ
1/17/2020: Motion in Limine - MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9
1/17/2020: Motion in Limine - MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6
1/17/2020: Opposition - OPPOSITION OPPOSITION TO MIL #2
1/31/2020: Motion in Limine - MOTION IN LIMINE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF COLLATERAL SOURCE PAYMENTS RECEIVED BY PLAINTIFF
1/31/2020: Motion in Limine - MOTION IN LIMINE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 4 TO EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINION OF DEFENSE EXPERT EDWARD FATZINGER, JR., MS PE
2/3/2020: Challenge To Judicial Officer - Peremptory (170.6)
2/3/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (JURY TRIAL (2ND); FINAL STATUS CONFERENCE)
2/4/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (JURY TRIAL)
2/6/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (JURY TRIAL)
2/7/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (JURY TRIAL)
2/10/2020: Jury Question - JURY QUESTION [THREE]
2/13/2020: Special Verdict
2/27/2020: Request for Dismissal
9/4/2020: Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service
8/12/2019: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE FSC AND TRIAL)
5/21/2019: [Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Person - [PROPOSED ORDER] AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL, FSC (AND RELATED MOTION/DISCOVERY DATES) PERSO
Docket Entries
- 09/22/2020
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 31, Thomas D. Long, Presiding; (OSC RE Dismissal) - Not Held - Vacated by Court
- 09/04/2020
-
DocketNotice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service; Filed by Eduardo Ramirez (Plaintiff); Glova-Link Corporation (Defendant)
- 03/30/2020
-
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department I; Order to Show Cause - Settlement - Not Held - Vacated by Court
- 02/27/2020
-
DocketRequest for Dismissal; Filed by Eduardo Ramirez (Plaintiff)
- 02/13/2020
-
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department I; Jury Trial - Held
- 02/13/2020
-
DocketSpecial Verdict; Filed by Clerk
- 02/13/2020
-
DocketJury Instructions; Filed by Clerk
- 02/13/2020
-
DocketJury Question ([Five]); Filed by Clerk
- 02/13/2020
-
DocketMinute Order ( (Jury Trial)); Filed by Clerk
- 02/11/2020
-
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department I; Jury Trial - Held - Continued
- 02/07/2018
-
DocketAnswer; Filed by Glova-Link Corporation (Defendant); Sergio Villamedrano (Defendant)
- 02/07/2018
-
DocketDEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
- 02/07/2018
-
DocketNOTICE OF POSTING JURY FEES
- 02/07/2018
-
DocketDemand for Jury Trial; Filed by Glova-Link Corporation (Defendant); Sergio Villamedrano (Defendant)
- 02/07/2018
-
DocketANSWER TO COMPLAINT
- 02/01/2018
-
DocketReceipt; Filed by Glova-Link Corporation (Defendant); Sergio Villamedrano (Defendant)
- 02/01/2018
-
DocketCIVIL DEPOSIT
- 09/22/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by Eduardo Ramirez (Plaintiff)
- 09/22/2017
-
DocketSUMMONS
- 09/22/2017
-
DocketCOMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: BC676775 Hearing Date: February 04, 2020 Dept: I
TENTATIVE RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF’S IN LIMINE MOTIONS
Plaintiff’s No. 2 – Motion To exclude Evidence of Gambling or Tax Returns
Allow use of tax returns redacted to exclude all evidence of income other than plaintiff’s earnings from driving. Other income sources are not relevant. Mention of gambling is irrelevant and prejudicial.
Plaintiff’s No. 4 – Motion to exclude Expert Opinion of Fatzinger
Hearing required. No Opposition was filed.
RULINGS ON DEFENDANTS’ IN LIMINE MOTIONS
No. 3 – Exclude Traffic Collision Report Conclusions of Liability and Witness Statements
Grant as to any conclusions of liability stated in report. Witness statement may be used to impeach testimony of witnesses at trial or to cross-examine experts.
No. 7 – Exclude Case-Specific Hearsay Statements
Grant, except where statements are relevant to impeach experts, or otherwise admissible under exception to hearsay rule.
No. 8 – Exclude Evidence of Settlement with 3rd Party Khadarian
Grant, unless Khadarian testifies.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases