DEMETRIO VIZCARRA MENDOZA ET AL VS LARRY GOERZEN ET AL
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****4875
-
Filing Date:
09/06/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judge
LAURA A. SEIGLE
Party Details
Plaintiffs and Petitioners
ESPINOZA MARTHA
MENDOZA DEMETRIO VIZCARRA
Respondents and Defendants
PROCTOR JOSIE
GOERZEN AMMIE
GOERZEN LARRY
DOES 1 TO 100
CARROWAY HARRY
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney
UPTON JOHN H. ESQ.
Court Documents
2/14/2019: Minute Order
2/14/2019: Ex Parte Application
Docket Entries
- 03/06/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Party's Motion
[-] Read Less
- 02/20/2019
-
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Party's Motion
[-] Read Less
- 02/14/2019
-
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Hearing on Ex Parte Application (for an order to continue the current trial date and discovery cutoff) - Held - Motion Granted
[-] Read Less
- 02/14/2019
-
DocketEx Parte Application (for an order to continue the current trial date and discovery cutoff); Filed by DEMETRIO VIZCARRA MENDOZA (Plaintiff); MARTHA ESPINOZA (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
- 02/14/2019
-
DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Ex Parte Application for an order to continue the ...)); Filed by Clerk
[-] Read Less
- 09/06/2017
-
DocketSUMMONS
[-] Read Less
- 09/06/2017
-
DocketCOMPLAINT-PERS. INJURY, PROP DAMAGE, WRONGFUL DEATH (2 PAGES)
[-] Read Less
- 09/06/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by DEMETRIO VIZCARRA MENDOZA (Plaintiff); MARTHA ESPINOZA (Plaintiff)
[-] Read Less
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: ****4875 Hearing Date: January 22, 2020 Dept: 27
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
Morey & Upton, LLP seeks to be relieved as counsel of record for plaintiff Martha Espinoza. Counsel states that there has been a complete breakdown of the attorney-client relationship and all of its attempts to contact Plaintiff have been unsuccessful. Absent a showing of resulting prejudice, an attorney’s request for withdrawal should be granted. (People v. Prince (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 398, 406.) Counsel’s Motion complies with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362. The Court notes that trial in this matter is currently set for June 5, 2020 and no prejudice will result from granting this motion. Accordingly, this unopposed motion to be relieved is GRANTED and effective upon filing a proof of service showing service of the order on Plaintiff and all parties who have appeared.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases