On 02/26/2018 a Contract - Other Contract case was filed by DAY TO DAY FASHION INC against 1128 1130 LOS ANGELES LLC in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California.
****5326
02/26/2018
Pending - Other Pending
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
ELIZABETH ALLEN WHITE
DAY TO DAY FASHION INC
DAY TO DAY FASHION INC.
DOES 1 TO 50
1128-1130 LOS ANGELES LLC
7/20/2018: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
7/27/2018: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
7/27/2018: Minute Order
9/19/2018: Minute Order
9/26/2018: NOTICE OF COURT ORDER SETTING MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
2/28/2019: Memorandum of Points & Authorities
2/28/2019: Declaration
2/28/2019: Motion for Summary Judgment
5/17/2019: Declaration
5/20/2019: Stipulation and Order
5/31/2019: Order
6/4/2019: Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses
6/4/2019: Declaration
6/4/2019: Proof of Service by Mail
6/4/2019: Request for Judicial Notice
3/28/2018: NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3/19/2018: NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3/19/2018: NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Separate Statement; Filed by Day to Day Fashion Inc. (Plaintiff)
Proof of Service by Mail; Filed by Day to Day Fashion Inc. (Plaintiff)
Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses; Filed by Day to Day Fashion Inc. (Plaintiff)
Declaration (OF ARYA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL); Filed by Day to Day Fashion Inc. (Plaintiff)
at 08:30 AM in Department 48, Elizabeth Allen White, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment - Not Held - Rescheduled by Party
at 08:30 AM in Department 48, Elizabeth Allen White, Presiding; Hearing on Ex Parte Application (to Continue Trial) - Held - Motion Granted
Minute Order ( (Hearing on Defendant 1128-1130 Los Angeles, LLC's Unopposed E...)); Filed by Clerk
Order (Granting Defendant's Unopposed Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial); Filed by 1128-1130 Los Angeles, LLC (Defendant)
Notice of Ruling (REGARDING DEFENDANT 1128-1130 LOS ANGELES LLC'S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL); Filed by 1128-1130 Los Angeles, LLC (Defendant)
at 08:30 AM in Department 48, Elizabeth Allen White, Presiding; Hearing on Ex Parte Application (to Continue Trial) - Held - Continued
Notice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Day to Day Fashion Inc. (Plaintiff)
Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Day to Day Fashion Inc. (Plaintiff)
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Notice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 1. NEGLIGENCE; ETC
DECLARATION OF ARYA RHODES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AGAINST DEFENDANT
SUMMONS
Complaint; Filed by Day to Day Fashion Inc. (Plaintiff)
Case Number: BC695326 Hearing Date: January 02, 2020 Dept: 48
MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (SET TWO); REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Day To Day Fashion, Inc.
RESPONDING PARTY(S): Defendant 1128-1130 Los Angeles, LLC
PROOF OF SERVICE:
GRANT motion to compel further responses to requests For Production No. 1;
GRANT request for sanctions in the reduced amount of $1,660.
ANALYSIS
Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents
CCP § 2031.310(b)(1) requires that a motion to compel further responses to requests for production “shall set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the discovery sought by the demand.” (Bold emphasis added.) See Kirkland v. Superior Court (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 92, 98.
¿ Request For Production No. 1: GRANT.
In the separate statement, Plaintiff has demonstrated good cause for production of the documents sought.
The response fails to comply with CCP § 2031.230, which provides:
A representation of inability to comply with the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party. The statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item.
(Bold emphasis and underlining added.)
A further response is due within 10 days.
Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against Defendant only is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $1,660. Sanctions are to be paid to Plaintiff’s counsel within 10 days.