This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 07/16/2019 at 01:53:28 (UTC).

DANIEL TONTINI VS JOSEPH M BARRETT ET AL

Case Summary

On 11/07/2017 DANIEL TONTINI filed a Contract - Professional Negligence lawsuit against JOSEPH M BARRETT. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are HOLLY E. KENDIG and TERESA A. BEAUDET. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****2657

  • Filing Date:

    11/07/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Contract - Professional Negligence

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

HOLLY E. KENDIG

TERESA A. BEAUDET

 

Party Details

Petitioner and Plaintiff

TONTINI DANIEL

Respondents, Defendants, Cross Defendants and Cross Plaintiffs

BARRETT JOSEPH M.

LAYFIELD PHILIP J

DOES 1 TO 20

BLAIN DAVID

WAKEFIELD TODD D.

WALLACE BRADLEY S.

CROWE WILLIAM

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Petitioner and Plaintiff Attorneys

PARKER DAVID B. ESQ.

WANG STEVEN SEAWHAN ESQ.

Defendant Attorneys

MONDIA MARIE B.

HARVEY RICHARD ALLEN

Cross Plaintiff Attorney

GRIVAKES CHRIS

 

Court Documents

Opposition

6/3/2019: Opposition

Declaration

6/3/2019: Declaration

Response

6/3/2019: Response

Objection

6/3/2019: Objection

Objection

6/17/2019: Objection

Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint)

6/17/2019: Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint)

Reply

6/17/2019: Reply

Stipulation and Order

6/19/2019: Stipulation and Order

Order

6/19/2019: Order

Minute Order

7/1/2019: Minute Order

Order

7/1/2019: Order

Notice of Ruling

7/3/2019: Notice of Ruling

Stipulation and Order

7/12/2019: Stipulation and Order

Notice of Ruling

7/12/2019: Notice of Ruling

Minute Order

7/12/2019: Minute Order

NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT - CIVIL

1/31/2018: NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT - CIVIL

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

2/15/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

2/15/2018: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

96 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 07/12/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 50, Teresa A. Beaudet, Presiding; Hearing on Ex Parte Application ( for an Order to Continue Trial) - Held - Motion Granted

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/12/2019
  • DocketNotice of Ruling; Filed by DANIEL TONTINI (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/12/2019
  • DocketStipulation and Order (for trial continuance)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/12/2019
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Ex Parte Application for an Order to Continue Trial)); Filed by Clerk

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/03/2019
  • DocketNotice of Ruling; Filed by WILLIAM CROWE (Defendant)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/01/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 50, Teresa A. Beaudet, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment (William Crowe) - Held

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/01/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 50, Teresa A. Beaudet, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment (David Blain) - Held

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/01/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 50, Teresa A. Beaudet, Presiding; Status Conference - Held

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/01/2019
  • DocketOrder (re motions for summary judgment)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 07/01/2019
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Status Conference; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment Wil...)); Filed by Clerk

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
187 More Docket Entries
  • 01/03/2018
  • DocketFIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR (1) BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY; (2) LEGAL MALPRACTICE

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/03/2018
  • DocketSummons; Filed by DANIEL TONTINI (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/03/2018
  • DocketFirst Amended Complaint; Filed by DANIEL TONTINI (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/29/2017
  • DocketNotice of Related Case; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/29/2017
  • DocketNotice of Related Cases

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/20/2017
  • DocketNOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/20/2017
  • DocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/07/2017
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by DANIEL TONTINI (Plaintiff)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/07/2017
  • DocketCOMPLAWT FOR (1) BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY; (2) LEGAL MALPRACTICE

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/07/2017
  • DocketSUMMONS

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: ****2657    Hearing Date: January 16, 2020    Dept: 50

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 50

daniel tontini,

Plaintiff,

vs.

joseph m. barrett, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.:

BC 682657

Hearing Date:

January 16, 2020

Hearing Time:

8:30 a.m.

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BY DEFENDANT PHILIP LAYFIELD

Pursuant to CCP ;; 430.41, 435.5 and 439, before filing a demurrer, motion to strike or motion for judgment on the pleadings, the moving party must meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the demurrer or motion to try to reach an agreement that resolves the claims to be raised in the demurrer or motion. Additionally, the moving party must file a declaration stating either (a) the means by which the moving party met and conferred and that the parties did not reach an agreement, or (b) the other party failed to respond to the request to meet and confer in person or by telephone or otherwise failed to meet and confer in good faith.

The motion for judgment on the pleadings by Defendant Philip Layfield (“Layfield”) does not comply with the above requirements. Accordingly, the Court orders Layfield to immediately comply with the meet and confer requirements. The hearing on the motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued to: _____________, at 8:30 a.m., in Department 50.

If the claims raised in the motion are not resolved and the motion is not withdrawn, Layfield is further ordered to file the requisite declaration at least 5 court days before the date of the continued hearing.

Layfield is ordered to provide notice of this Order.

DATED: January 16, 2020 ________________________________

Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet

Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court



related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer WANG STEVEN S.

Latest cases represented by Lawyer PARKER, DAVID B