On 03/22/2018 COREY LARGE filed a Contract - Other Contract lawsuit against TUNNEL POST, INC. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is NANCY L. NEWMAN. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
NANCY L. NEWMAN
BUTLER BAY ENTERPRISES LTD
TUNNEL POST INC.
DIGITAL COMPLIANCE GROUP INC.
TUNNEL GROUP INC. DOE 4
JAGUAR ENTERTAINMENT CORP. DOE 5
DENOVO DIGITAL DOE 6
LOWE STEVEN T.
LOWE STEVEN T.
LOWE STEVEN TODD
KERNAN STEPHEN MICHAEL
CABANDAY ORLANDO F.
Attorney at Cabanday Law Group
21221 S Western Ave. Suite 208
Torrance, CA 90501
CABANDAY ORLANDO F
8/12/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (COURT ORDER)
7/31/2020: Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses
7/31/2020: Motion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery) - 1 moving party, 1 motion
7/1/2020: Order Granting Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel-Civil
4/20/2020: Declaration in Support of Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel-Civil
1/8/2020: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment
11/13/2019: Proof of Service by Substituted Service
7/17/2019: Answer - ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS TUNNEL INC.; AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
4/16/2019: Order Appointing Court Approved Reporter as Official Reporter Pro Tempore
4/2/2019: Notice of Ruling
4/3/2019: Opposition - OPPOSITION OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER
1/3/2019: Minute Order - Minute Order (Court Order Re Defendant Tunnel Post, Inc.'s Peremptory Chall...)
11/20/2018: Request - Request TO STRIKE DECLARATION OF STEVEN T. LOWE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY
11/16/2018: Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice
12/4/2018: Notice of Ruling - Notice of Ruling RE: Motion to Deem Defendants' Service of Discovery Responses Invalid, Objections to Discovery Waived, Enter Stipulated Protective Order and Request for Sanctions A
11/9/2018: Opposition - Opposition to Motion to Deem Service of Discovery Responses invalid Objections to Discovery Waived Enter Stipulated Protective Order, and Request for Sanctions
10/15/2018: Notice - notice of motion to strike 2-27-19 8:30 am dept p
7/30/2018: Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel -
Hearing01/06/2021 at 08:30 AM in Department M at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401; Hearing on Motion for Judgment on the PleadingsRead MoreRead Less
Hearing01/06/2021 at 08:30 AM in Department M at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401; Case Management ConferenceRead MoreRead Less
DocketNotice of Lien; Filed by Steven T. Lowe (Non-Party)Read MoreRead Less
Docketat 09:30 AM in Department M; Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses (TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO) - Not Held - Vacated by CourtRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department M; Hearing on Motion for Terminating Sanctions - Not Held - Vacated by CourtRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department M; Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses (REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE) - Not Held - Vacated by CourtRead MoreRead Less
DocketNotice of Ruling; Filed by JACK LUU (Defendant); ALAN PAO (Defendant); Digital Compliance Group, Inc. (Defendant) et al.Read MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department M; Case Management Conference - Held - ContinuedRead MoreRead Less
DocketMinute Order ( (Case Management Conference)); Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department M; Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery (not "Further Discovery") - Not Held - Vacated by CourtRead MoreRead Less
DocketAnswer; Filed by JACK LUU (Defendant); ALAN PAO (Defendant); TUNNEL POST, INC. (Defendant)Read MoreRead Less
DocketNotice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information; Filed by JACK LUU (Defendant); ALAN PAO (Defendant); TUNNEL POST, INC. (Defendant)Read MoreRead Less
DocketNotice of Change of Address; Filed by Attorney for DefendantRead MoreRead Less
DocketDeclaration (Of Demurring Party)Read MoreRead Less
DocketDeclaration (IN SUPPORT OF AUTOMATIC EXTENSION ); Filed by Attorney for DefendantRead MoreRead Less
DocketDeclaration; Filed by JACK LUU (Defendant); ALAN PAO (Defendant)Read MoreRead Less
DocketSummons Filed; Filed by Attorney for PlaintiffRead MoreRead Less
DocketSummons; Filed by PlaintiffRead MoreRead Less
DocketComplaint; Filed by BUTLER BAY ENTERPRISES LTD (Plaintiff); COREY LARGE (Plaintiff); JODY LARGE (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketComplaint FiledRead MoreRead Less
Case Number: SC129035 Hearing Date: July 01, 2020 Dept: M
CASE NAME: Corey Large, et al. v. Tunnel Post, Inc., et al.
CASE NO.: SC129035
SUBJECT: Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
On April 20, 2020 Counsel for Plaintiff Corey Large filed a motion seeking to be relieved as counsel.
The Court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client and it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. (See Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915; People v. Prince (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 398.)
An application to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial Council Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). (CRC Rule 3.1362(a), (c), (e).) “The [proposed] order must specify all hearing dates scheduled in the action or proceeding, including the date of trial, if known. If no hearing date is presently scheduled, the court may set one and specify the date in the order. After the order is signed, a copy of the signed order must be served on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case.” (CRC Rule 3.1362(e) (emphasis added).)
The requisite forms must be served “on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case.” (CRC Rule 3.1362(d).) The required forms may be served “by personal service, electronic service, or mail.” (CRC Rule 3.1362(d).) In addition, “[i]f the notice is served on the client by electronic service under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6 and rule 2.251, it must be accompanied by a declaration stating that the electronic service address is the client's current electronic service address.” (CRC Rule 3.1362(d)(2).) Furthermore, as used in CRC Rule 3.162, “‘current’ means that the address was confirmed within 30 days before the filing of the motion to be relieved. Merely demonstrating that the notice was sent to the client's last known address and was not returned or no electronic delivery failure message was received is not, by itself, sufficient to demonstrate that the address is current . . ..’” (CRC Rule 3.1362(d).)
Attorney Steven T. Lowe of Lowe & Associates (“Counsel”) for Defendant seeks to be relieved as counsel. Here, Counsel for Plaintiff has filed Judicial Council Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order).
Counsel notes that the client has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship for failure to pay fees. (Lowe Decl., MC-052, item 2.) Counsel seeks to withdraw due to this breakdown of the attorney-client relationship. (Id.) The motion is GRANTED.