Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 06/14/2019 at 09:22:04 (UTC).

AUSCENCIO CARRILLO ET AL VS ANALEA PAULE ET AL

Case Summary

On 09/20/2017 AUSCENCIO CARRILLO filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against ANALEA PAULE. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****6377

  • Filing Date:

    09/20/2017

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs and Petitioners

CARRILLO RUBEN

CARILLO AUSCENCIO

NORONA JESUS ALONSO

RODRIGUEZ CRYSTAL

INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTO CLUB

BARAJAS ANA LAURA

Defendants, Respondents and Cross Plaintiffs

PAULE WILFREDO

YI CHON TAE

DOES 1 TO 50

PAULE ANALEA

YI CHING TEA

GREAT CENTURY SYSTEMS INC

GREAT CENTURY SYSTEMS INC.

Defendants, Cross Plaintiffs and Cross Defendants

YI CHING TEA

RODRIGUEZ ANA

BARAJAS ANA

RODRIGUEZ LEONARD

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

DRAKE BENJAMIN ESQ.

SCHWARZ MARC A.

MENDELSON LEE MICHAEL

Defendant and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys

FOX DANA ALDEN ESQ.

KORFF EVE H. ESQ.

FIELDS GARY DAVID

CAPPS AARON GLENN

Other Attorneys

KORFF EVE HELENE

FIELDS GARY D.

 

Court Documents

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

2/5/2018: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

3/1/2018: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

3/7/2018: DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF, COMPARATIVE INDEMNITY AND EQUITABLE INDEMNITY

3/7/2018: CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF, COMPARATIVE INDEMNITY AND EQUITABLE INDEMNITY

DEFENDANT CHONG TAE YI'S ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT

8/9/2018: DEFENDANT CHONG TAE YI'S ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT

Notice of Related Case

12/11/2018: Notice of Related Case

Minute Order

12/19/2018: Minute Order

Unknown

12/19/2018: Unknown

Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information

4/17/2019: Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information

Ex Parte Application

5/17/2019: Ex Parte Application

Minute Order

5/17/2019: Minute Order

Unknown

11/27/2017: Unknown

DECLARATION OF DILIGENCE

10/23/2017: DECLARATION OF DILIGENCE

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

10/23/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

Unknown

10/23/2017: Unknown

Civil Case Cover Sheet

9/20/2017: Civil Case Cover Sheet

Summons

9/20/2017: Summons

Complaint

9/20/2017: Complaint

26 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/06/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Trial Setting Conference - Not Held - Vacated by Court

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/20/2019
  • Notice of Ruling; Filed by Analea Paule (Legacy Party); Wilfredo Paule (Legacy Party)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/17/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Hearing on Ex Parte Application (to Continue Trial, Final Status Conference, and All Trial Related Cutoff Dates) - Held - Motion Granted

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/17/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Hearing on Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial, Final Stat...)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/17/2019
  • Ex Parte Application (to Continue Trial, Final Status Conference, and All Trial Related Cutoff Dates); Filed by Analea Paule (Legacy Party); Wilfredo Paule (Legacy Party)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/17/2019
  • Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information; Filed by Lillian Kim (Attorney)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/20/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/11/2019
  • Stipulation and Order (STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED CASES; [PROPOSED] ORDER); Filed by Chong Tae Yi Erroneously Sued As Chon Tae Yi (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/06/2019
  • at 10:00 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Court

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/06/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Final Status Conference)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
58 More Docket Entries
  • 10/20/2017
  • Declaration; Filed by Auscencio Carillo (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/20/2017
  • PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/20/2017
  • DECLARATION OF DILIGENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/20/2017
  • Proof of Service by Mail; Filed by Auscencio Carillo (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/20/2017
  • PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/20/2017
  • Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Auscencio Carillo (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/20/2017
  • Civil Case Cover Sheet

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/20/2017
  • Complaint

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/20/2017
  • Complaint; Filed by Auscencio Carillo (Plaintiff); Ruben Carrillo (Plaintiff); Jesus Alonso Norona (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/20/2017
  • Summons; Filed by Auscencio Carillo (Plaintiff); Ruben Carrillo (Plaintiff); Jesus Alonso Norona (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC676377    Hearing Date: October 13, 2020    Dept: 32

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 32

miguel Angel Gonzalez,

Plaintiff,

v.

analea paule, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: BC676377

Hearing Date: October 13, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

motions to compel discovery responses

Defendant Analea Paule (“Defendant”) moves to compel responses from Plaintiff Miguel Angel Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) to: (1) Request for Production of Documents, Set One (“RPD”); (2) Form Interrogatories, Set One (“FROG”); and (3) Special Interrogatories, Set One (“SROG”). Defendant served the written discovery on Plaintiff by mail on November 26, 2019. Plaintiff’s responses were thus due by December 31, 2019. As of the filing date of these motions, Defendant has not received responses from Plaintiff. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion, and there is nothing in the record to suggest that Plaintiff has complied with his discovery obligations. Therefore, the motions are granted.

Defendant seeks sanctions in connection with the motions. The Court finds that Plaintiff’s failure to respond to discovery is an abuse of the discovery process. The Court awards sanctions against Plaintiff and her counsel of record, Prestige Law Group, in the amount of $880, which represents four hours of attorney time to prepare the motions and attend the hearing at $190 per hour, plus two filing fees of $60 each.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Defendant’s motions to compel responses to the RPD, FROG, and SROG are granted per Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290 and 2031.300. Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified responses, without objections, within 30 days of notice of this order.

Plaintiff and her counsel of record, Prestige Law Group, jointly and severally, are ordered to pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $880 to Defendant, by and through counsel, within 30 days of notice of this order.

Defendant is ordered to provide notice of this order and file proof of service of such.

DATED: October 13, 2020 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court

Case Number: BC676377    Hearing Date: August 19, 2020    Dept: 32

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 32

miguel angel gonzalez,

Plaintiff,

v.

analea paulie, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 18STLC13920, consolidated with

BC676377, BC694022,

18STLC01180, 18STLC14760

Hearing Date: August 19, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

motions to compel discovery responses

Defendant Analea Paule (“Defendant”) moves to compel responses from Plaintiff Miguel Angel Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) to: (1) Request for Production of Documents, Set One (“RPD”); (2) Form Interrogatories, Set One (“FROG”); and (3) Special Interrogatories, Set One (“SROG”). On November 1, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice of change of address. Defendant served these motions at the prior address. There are no oppositions on file, suggesting that Plaintiff’s counsel did not receive the motions. Therefore, the motions are denied without prejudice. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: August 19, 2020 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court

Case Number: BC676377    Hearing Date: July 01, 2020    Dept: 32

NEW TENTATIVE ORDER

auscencio carrillo, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

analea paule, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: BC676377 (Consolidated with

18STLC01180 and BC694022)

Hearing Date: July 1, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

MOTIONs TO consolidate

Defendants Chong Tae Yi and Analea Paule (“Defendants”) move to consolidate this case with Gonzalez v. Paule, et al. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 2018, No. 18STLC13920) and Negrete v. Paule, et al. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 2018, No. 18STLC14760). Per Local Rule 3.3, subdivision (g), “Cases may not be consolidated unless they are in the same department. A motion to consolidate two or more cases may be noticed and heard after the cases, initially filed in different departments, have been related into a single department, or if the cases were already assigned to that department.” (Super. Ct. L.A. County, Local Rules, rule 3.3(g)(1).) All cases are now pending in Department #32. The motion sets forth good causes for consolidation. Finally, there is no opposition to the motion. Therefore, the motion is granted.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Defendants’ motions to consolidate this case with Gonzalez v. Paule, et al. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 2018, No. 18STLC13920) and Negrete v. Paule, et al. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 2018, No. 18STLC14760) is granted. Case Number BC676377 shall be the lead case, meaning that the final status conference and trial shall be held as follows:

Final Status Conference: October 1, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.

Trial: October 15, 2020, at 8:30 a.m.

The discovery and motions cut-off shall be based on this trial date. Defendants shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: July 1, 2020 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTO CLUB is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer KORFF EVE H. ESQ.

Latest cases represented by Lawyer FIELDS GARY D.