ANZHEY BARANTSEVICH ET AL VS P4C GLOBAL INC ET AL
Case Summary
On 06/06/2017 ANZHEY BARANTSEVICH filed a Labor - Wrongful Termination lawsuit against P4C GLOBAL INC. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is GREGORY KEOSIAN. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****4016
-
Filing Date:
06/06/2017
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Court:
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
-
Courthouse:
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judge
GREGORY KEOSIAN
Party Details
Plaintiffs, Petitioners and Cross Defendants
ZOOOM INC.
BARANTSEVICH ANZHEY
Defendants, Respondents and Cross Plaintiffs
OEM BATTERY DEPOT LLC
DOES 1 THROUGH 25
HOPWOOD STEVEN
P4C GLOBAL INC.
Not Classified By Court
CAMERON BEAU
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys
CHALEFF DANIEL
PARRIS R. REX ESQ.
WOO FELIX T. ESQ.
WOO FELIX T.
LIM S. YOUNG
YEREMIAN ARPINEH
MITILIAN ARMEN
Defendant, Respondent and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys
FLORES MICHELLE LEE ESQ.
MEPPEN DEBRA ELLWOOD ESQ.
DIPIETRA ANTHONY ESQ.
DIPETRA RONALD ANTHONY
DIPIETRA RONALD ANTHONY ESQ.
Plaintiff and Cross Defendant Attorney
YEREMIAN ARPINEH
Court Documents
10/9/2020: Association of Attorney
8/25/2020: Notice of Lien
8/25/2020: Proof of Service by Mail
8/18/2020: Notice of Lien
4/1/2020: Answer
4/2/2020: Substitution of Attorney
1/8/2020: Order - ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME AND ADVANCING THE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A CROSS-COMPLAINT
8/20/2019: Ex Parte Application - EX PARTE APPLICATION PLAINTIFF ANZHEY BARANTSEVICHS NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION AND APPLICATION TO SET TRIAL SCHEDULE
6/20/2019: Notice of Ruling
4/25/2019: Notice of Ruling - NOTICE OF RULING RULING RE PLAINTIFFS ANZHEY BARANTZEVICH AND ZOOOM, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRIORITY ORDER OF DEPOSITIONS
2/20/2019: Declaration - Declaration of Felix T. Woo and Proposed Order Submitted Concurrently
3/4/2019: Motion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery) - 1 moving party, 1 motion - Motion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery) - 1 moving party, 1 motion
4/2/2018: DECLARATION OF TAMAR KARAGUEZIAN ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
4/5/2018: Notice of Change of Address -
4/25/2018: PLAINTIFFS ANZHEY BARANTSEVICN AND Z000M, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS P4C GLOBAL, INC. AND STEVEN HOPWOOD'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; ETC
5/2/2018: DEFENDANTS P4C GLOBAL INC. AND STEVEN HOPWOOD'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
7/24/2017: NOTICE RE: CONTINUANCE OF HEARING
9/25/2017: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT -
Docket Entries
- 04/19/2022
-
Hearing04/19/2022 at 09:00 AM in Department 61 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial
- 04/11/2022
-
Hearing04/11/2022 at 09:00 AM in Department 61 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status Conference
- 02/10/2022
-
Hearing02/10/2022 at 09:00 AM in Department 61 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Post-Mediation Status Conference
- 04/01/2021
-
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 61, Gregory Keosian, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings - Not Held - Rescheduled by Party
- 01/27/2021
-
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 61, Gregory Keosian, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings - Not Held - Rescheduled by Party
- 01/27/2021
-
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 61, Gregory Keosian, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel (Production of Documents) - Not Held - Rescheduled by Party
- 01/27/2021
-
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 61, Gregory Keosian, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel (Discovery Responses) - Not Held - Rescheduled by Party
- 01/21/2021
-
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department 61, Gregory Keosian, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings - Not Held - Rescheduled by Court
- 01/21/2021
-
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department 61, Gregory Keosian, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel (Production of Documents) - Not Held - Rescheduled by Court
- 01/21/2021
-
Docketat 09:00 AM in Department 61, Gregory Keosian, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel (Discovery Responses) - Not Held - Rescheduled by Court
- 06/30/2017
-
DocketProof-Service/Summons
- 06/30/2017
-
DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
- 06/30/2017
-
DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
- 06/19/2017
-
DocketORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING
- 06/19/2017
-
DocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
- 06/19/2017
-
DocketNOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
- 06/19/2017
-
DocketOSC-Failure to File Proof of Serv; Filed by Clerk
- 06/06/2017
-
DocketCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES: 1) BREACH OF WRITTEN CONTRACT; ETC
- 06/06/2017
-
DocketSUMMONS
- 06/06/2017
-
DocketComplaint; Filed by Anzhey Barantsevich (Plaintiff); Zooom, Inc. (Plaintiff)
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: BC664016 Hearing Date: January 06, 2020 Dept: 61
Plaintiffs Anzhey Barantzevich and Zooom, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Access to Quickbooks Password of P4C Global, Inc. and OEM Battery Depot, LLC is GRANTED.
MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE
Plaintiffs move to compel Defendants P4C Global, Inc. and OEM Battery Depot, LLC to allow access to Quickbooks database files that Defendants have produced to Plaintiffs, but which remain useless because they are password-protected. The court construes this motion as one to compel compliance under Code of Civil Procedure § 2031.320:
If a party filing a response to a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling under Sections 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, and 2031.280 thereafter fails to permit the inspection, copying, testing, or sampling in accordance with that party's statement of compliance, the demanding party may move for an order compelling compliance.
(Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.320, subd. (a).)
Plaintiffs contend that in response to their Fourth Set of Requests for Production, Defendants have produced Quickbooks files, but that these files remain password-protected and inaccessible to Plaintiffs. (Woo Decl. ¶ 6.) During meet-and-confer efforts, Defendants attempted to limit access to the Quickbooks files under the argument that the files contained private information. (Woo Decl. Exh. E.) But Defendants have presented no opposition or argument here supporting that contention. In addition, the court notes that a protective order is already in place in this matter as of October 22, 2018.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel is GRANTED.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases