WEN TZU DAVIS VS PEARL OF THE EAST
Case Summary
On 04/01/2014 WEN TZU DAVIS filed a Property - Other Real Property lawsuit against PEARL OF THE EAST. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Pomona Courthouse South located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is DUKES, ROBERT A.. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****6761
-
Filing Date:
04/01/2014
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Court:
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
-
Courthouse:
Pomona Courthouse South
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judge
DUKES, ROBERT A.
Party Details
Plaintiffs
DAVIS WEN-TZU
LIN CHENG-FENG
Defendants and Cross Plaintiffs
DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING OF LOS
OLISAN INC.
PEARL OF THE EAST RTC L.P.
ROWLAND HEIGHTS MOBILE ESTATES LP.
ROWLAND RANCH PROPERTIES LLC.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REGIONAL PLANNING
Defendant and Cross Defendant
ROWLAND RANCH PROPERTIES LLC.
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Defendant and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys
DOWDALL TERRY R. ESQ.
SMITH STEPHEN H. ESQ.
CITRON JOEL F. ESQ.
KRAMER JEFFREY S. LAW OFFICES OF
Court Documents
Court documents are not available for this case.
Docket Entries
- 03/07/2016
-
Demurrer Filed by Plaintiff, & Plaintiff in Pro Per
- 03/07/2016
-
Motion to Strike Filed by Plaintiff, & Plaintiff in Pro Per
- 02/10/2016
-
Second Amended Cross-Complaint Filed by Attorney for Defendant/X-Defendant
- 01/26/2016
-
Notice of Ruling Filed by Attorney for Defendant/X-Defendant
- 01/19/2016
-
Reply Filed by Plaintiff, & Plaintiff in Pro Per
- 01/11/2016
-
Opposition (TO DEM & MO TO STRK ) Filed by Attorney for Defendant/X-Defendant
- 01/04/2016
-
Notice (OF TAKING MTC O/C ) Filed by Atty for Defendant and Cross-Compl
- 11/09/2015
-
Answer to Complaint Filed Filed by Attorney for Defendant
- 11/09/2015
-
Demand for Jury Trial Filed by Attorney for Defendant
- 09/14/2015
-
Motion to Strike (PORTIONS OF CROSS-COMPLAINANTS, PEARL OF THE EAST RTC, L.P.'S FIRST AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT ) Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff in Pro Per
- 05/13/2014
-
Notice of Continuance (DEMURRER/STRIKE ) Filed by Attorney for Defendant
- 05/12/2014
-
Cross-complaint filed Filed by Atty for Defendant and Cross-Compl
- 05/12/2014
-
Demand for Jury Trial Filed by Atty for Defendant and Cross-Compl
- 05/12/2014
-
Answer to Complaint Filed Filed by Attorney for Defendant
- 05/09/2014
-
Notice of Hearing on Demurrer (SET 7/17/14 ) Filed by Attorney for Defendant
- 05/09/2014
-
Motion to Strike (SET 7/17/14 ) Filed by Attorney for Defendant
- 04/04/2014
-
Notice-Case Management Conference Filed by Clerk
- 04/01/2014
-
Order-Court Fee Waiver Filed by Plaintiff
- 04/01/2014
-
Complaint Filed
- 04/01/2014
-
Request-Waive Court Fees Filed by Plaintiff
Tentative Rulings
Case Number: KC066761 Hearing Date: October 24, 2019 Dept: O
The Court GRANTS the abstract of judgment based on the facts that judgment was entered in Defendants’ favor. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated any evidence or facts that would prevent this Court from entering the abstract of judgment, other than mitigating factors (i.e., claims of exemption) that could affect Judgment Creditors’ ability to collect on the abstract of judgment from Judgment Debtor/Plaintiff (after the abstract of judgment is entered).
Plaintiffs seems to be arguing a claim of exemption to the judgment. However, the pending motion has no relationship to a claim of exemption.
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases