On 04/01/2014 WEN TZU DAVIS filed a Property - Other Real Property lawsuit against PEARL OF THE EAST. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Pomona Courthouse South located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is DUKES, ROBERT A.. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
****6761
04/01/2014
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Pomona Courthouse South
Los Angeles, California
DUKES, ROBERT A.
DAVIS WEN-TZU
LIN CHENG-FENG
DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING OF LOS
OLISAN INC.
PEARL OF THE EAST RTC L.P.
ROWLAND HEIGHTS MOBILE ESTATES LP.
ROWLAND RANCH PROPERTIES LLC.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REGIONAL PLANNING
ROWLAND RANCH PROPERTIES LLC.
DOWDALL TERRY R. ESQ.
SMITH STEPHEN H. ESQ.
CITRON JOEL F. ESQ.
KRAMER JEFFREY S. LAW OFFICES OF
Court documents are not available for this case.
Demurrer Filed by Plaintiff, & Plaintiff in Pro Per
Motion to Strike Filed by Plaintiff, & Plaintiff in Pro Per
Second Amended Cross-Complaint Filed by Attorney for Defendant/X-Defendant
Notice of Ruling Filed by Attorney for Defendant/X-Defendant
Reply Filed by Plaintiff, & Plaintiff in Pro Per
Opposition (TO DEM & MO TO STRK ) Filed by Attorney for Defendant/X-Defendant
Notice (OF TAKING MTC O/C ) Filed by Atty for Defendant and Cross-Compl
Answer to Complaint Filed Filed by Attorney for Defendant
Demand for Jury Trial Filed by Attorney for Defendant
Motion to Strike (PORTIONS OF CROSS-COMPLAINANTS, PEARL OF THE EAST RTC, L.P.'S FIRST AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT ) Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff in Pro Per
Notice of Continuance (DEMURRER/STRIKE ) Filed by Attorney for Defendant
Cross-complaint filed Filed by Atty for Defendant and Cross-Compl
Demand for Jury Trial Filed by Atty for Defendant and Cross-Compl
Answer to Complaint Filed Filed by Attorney for Defendant
Notice of Hearing on Demurrer (SET 7/17/14 ) Filed by Attorney for Defendant
Motion to Strike (SET 7/17/14 ) Filed by Attorney for Defendant
Notice-Case Management Conference Filed by Clerk
Order-Court Fee Waiver Filed by Plaintiff
Complaint Filed
Request-Waive Court Fees Filed by Plaintiff
Case Number: KC066761 Hearing Date: October 24, 2019 Dept: O
The Court GRANTS the abstract of judgment based on the facts that judgment was entered in Defendants’ favor. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated any evidence or facts that would prevent this Court from entering the abstract of judgment, other than mitigating factors (i.e., claims of exemption) that could affect Judgment Creditors’ ability to collect on the abstract of judgment from Judgment Debtor/Plaintiff (after the abstract of judgment is entered).
Plaintiffs seems to be arguing a claim of exemption to the judgment. However, the pending motion has no relationship to a claim of exemption.