THE MAHR GROUP LLC VS DANIEL T PIERSON
Case Summary
On 02/08/2016 THE MAHR GROUP LLC filed an Other - Declaratory Judgment lawsuit against DANIEL T PIERSON. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is KEVIN C. BRAZILE. The case status is Disposed - Judgment Entered.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
****9445
-
Filing Date:
02/08/2016
-
Case Status:
Disposed - Judgment Entered
-
Courthouse:
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
-
County, State:
Los Angeles, California
Judge Details
Presiding Judge
KEVIN C. BRAZILE
Party Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner
MAHR GROUP LLC THE
Defendants and Respondents
PIERSON DANIEL T.
DOES 1 TO 100
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorney
CUNNEEN DAWN HALL ESQ
Defendant and Respondent Attorney
REINIS MITCHELL N. ESQ.
Court Documents
2/8/2016: COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
2/8/2016: SUMMONS
2/24/2016: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
2/26/2016: Unknown
3/1/2016: NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3/9/2016: NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3/17/2016: DECLARATION OF MITCHELL N. REINIS RE DEMURRER AND REQUESTING JUDICIAL NOTICE
3/17/2016: NOTICE OF HEARING AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
4/14/2016: Minute Order
5/5/2016: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
5/11/2016: DECLARATION OF JESS R. BOOTH IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER
5/11/2016: OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER
5/17/2016: REPLY POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER
5/24/2016: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO USE CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
5/24/2016: Minute Order
5/27/2016: JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FOLLOWING SUSTAINING OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
6/6/2016: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER
Docket Entries
- 08/10/2016
-
at 09:00 AM in Department 12; Case Management Conference
- 06/06/2016
-
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER
- 05/27/2016
-
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FOLLOWING SUSTAINING OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
- 05/27/2016
-
Judgment; Filed by Defendant/Respondent
- 05/24/2016
-
at 09:30 AM in Department 12; Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike (Hearing on Demurrer; Sustained) -
- 05/24/2016
-
Minute Order
- 05/24/2016
-
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO USE CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
- 05/24/2016
-
Stipulation and Order to use Certified Shorthand Reporter; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner
- 05/17/2016
-
REPLY POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER
- 05/17/2016
-
Reply/Response; Filed by Daniel T. Pierson (Defendant)
- 03/09/2016
-
Notice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Mahr Group, LLC, The (Plaintiff)
- 03/01/2016
-
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
- 03/01/2016
-
Notice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
- 02/26/2016
-
NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT - CIVIL
- 02/26/2016
-
Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt; Filed by Mahr Group, LLC, The (Plaintiff)
- 02/24/2016
-
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
- 02/24/2016
-
Notice of Related Case; Filed by Mahr Group, LLC, The (Plaintiff)
- 02/08/2016
-
SUMMONS
- 02/08/2016
-
Complaint; Filed by Mahr Group, LLC, The (Plaintiff)
- 02/08/2016
-
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Complaint Information
j—y
e 0 g & U & W
v 24 e
TY1r oz owonet o TRULCT v
* Onigng ®
THOMPSON COBURN LLP
MITCHELL N. REINIS, CSB 36131 - msGtonpmeoburion RECENTL FILED Los Angeles, California 90067 MAY 25 2[]1l§ountv of Los Angeles Tel: 310.282.2500 / Fax: 310.282.2501 WAY 2 5 2016 MAY 2% 2018 Attorneys for Defendant, Daniel T. Pierson, Sherri R, Carter, Executive Officer\Clgrk Administrator Bymaemna 7= Deputy
PREJUDICE FOLLOWING SUSTAINING
DANIEL T. PIERSON, Administrator of the OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT Estate of James Brand Hall; and DOES 1 to WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
100, inclusive, DATE: November 24, 2016 Defendants. TIME: 9:30 a.m. DEPT.: 12
Complaint Filed: Februarv 8. 2016
Having sustained the demurrer of defendant, Daniel T. Pierson, Administrator of the Estate | of James Brand Hall to the complaint filed by plaintiff, The Mahr Group, LLC, without leave to ' amend, the Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice in its entirety. Defendant is the |
prevailing party and entitled to recover costs of suit in the sum of § : ;
DATED: May%Z 2016
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases