This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 06/17/2019 at 13:02:51 (UTC).

SAUL ARREGUIN ET AL VS THAIWADHANA KASAORN

Case Summary

On 07/14/2016 SAUL ARREGUIN filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against THAIWADHANA KASAORN. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are HOLLY E. KENDIG and ELAINE LU. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****6997

  • Filing Date:

    07/14/2016

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

HOLLY E. KENDIG

ELAINE LU

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs and Petitioners

ARREGUIN SAUL

DUENAS ANA

Defendants and Respondents

KASAORN THAIWADHANA

DOES 1 THROUGH 50

SANCHEZ RUBEN

SANCHEZ MARTHA

COLIBRI PROPERTIES DOE 3

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

OCEANBRIDGE LAW FIRM A.P.L.C.

EKPENISI ESQ. MACAULEY ISIOMA

 

Court Documents

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

1/10/2018: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

Minute Order

1/16/2018: Minute Order

Minute Order

4/19/2018: Minute Order

Minute Order

6/7/2018: Minute Order

Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice

12/7/2018: Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice

Request for Dismissal

3/1/2019: Request for Dismissal

Application

3/8/2019: Application

Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

3/8/2019: Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

Minute Order

5/13/2019: Minute Order

Unknown

8/8/2016: Unknown

CLERK'S NOTICE OF VOIDING OF FILING

8/16/2016: CLERK'S NOTICE OF VOIDING OF FILING

AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

8/25/2016: AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

8/25/2016: AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

10/31/2016: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

10/31/2016: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

CLERK'S APPLICATION TO VACATE AND ORDER

3/24/2017: CLERK'S APPLICATION TO VACATE AND ORDER

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

4/28/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

11/1/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

31 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 05/13/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 26, Elaine Lu, Presiding; Case Management Conference (& OSC RE PROOF OF SERVICE) - Held - Continued

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/13/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Case Management Conference & OSC RE PROOF OF SERVICE)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/15/2019
  • Statement of Damages (Personal Injury or Wrongful Death); Filed by Saul Arreguin (Plaintiff); Ana Duenas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2019
  • at 2:22 PM in Department 26, Elaine Lu, Presiding; Non-Appearance Case Review

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Non-Appearance Case Review)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2019
  • Request for Entry of Default / Judgment

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2019
  • Certificate of Mailing for (Minute Order (Non-Appearance Case Review) of 03/08/2019); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2019
  • Application (For Entry of Judgment Supporting Affidavit of Macauley Ekpenisi, Saul Arreguin, Ana Duenas)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/01/2019
  • Request for Dismissal; Filed by Saul Arreguin (Plaintiff); Ana Duenas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/13/2019
  • Notice of Ruling; Filed by Saul Arreguin (Plaintiff); Ana Duenas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
71 More Docket Entries
  • 08/09/2016
  • Summons; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/08/2016
  • CIVIL DEPOSIT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/15/2016
  • Order on Court Fee Waiver (Superior Court); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/15/2016
  • Order on Court Fee Waiver (Superior Court); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/15/2016
  • ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/15/2016
  • ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/14/2016
  • Request to Waive Court Fees; Filed by Ana Duenas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/14/2016
  • COMPLAINT AGAINST LANDLORD BASED ON: 1. NEGLIGENCE [CIV. CODE 1714(A), 3333; ETC

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/14/2016
  • Request to Waive Court Fees; Filed by Saul Arreguin (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/14/2016
  • Complaint; Filed by Saul Arreguin (Plaintiff); Ana Duenas (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC626997    Hearing Date: March 13, 2020    Dept: 26

Arreguin et al v. Kasaorn et al., BC626997

The Request for Entry of Default Judgment submitted on January 10, 2020 is denied without prejudice for the following reasons:

Judgment Form

No Proposed judgment form has been submitted.

Pending Defendants

No request for dismissal (Judicial Council Form No. CIV-110) has been filed for all remaining defendants (including un-served does and defendants who have appeared). Specifically, the Doe Defendants of the First Amended Complaint remain pending.

Lack of Military Declaration

The military declaration on form CIV-100 has not been executed.

Unclear Damages

It is unclear what damages Plaintiffs seeks. The First Amended Complaint filed on August 15, 2019 lists general damages according to proof, and a total of $36, 225.00. However, there appears to be a typo in one of the damages requested making damages possibly $47,250.00. The amended statement of damages filed on August 15, 2019 lists $78,175.86 of damages. The CIV-100 form filed on January 10, 2020 lists $64,040.86. Finally, Plaintiffs’ delcarations filed on January 10, 2020 only mention damages for a total of $43,540.86. As Plaintiffs have not filed any proposed judgment on form JUD-100, it is unclear what amount of damages Plaintiffs seek.

Damages

Plaintiff is missing a ledger, an accounting or invoices, from the original creditor, showing how the balance due was calculated. The documents submitted do not establish the judgment amount requested.

Plaintiffs request general damages of $30,550 for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, but Plaintiffs have not provided evidence to support such an amount. Plaintiffs’ declaration do not mention or give any description of any pain or suffering.

Plaintiffs request Statutory Damages of $15,000, but Plaintiffs have failed to provide any explanation as to this amount of statutory damages

Plaintiffs request for $5,5670.86 for personal property damages. Plaintiffs have attached unauthenticated receipts. It is unclear what the receipts are for, and some of the receipts attached are in Spanish. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1110, [“Exhibits written in a foreign language must be accompanied by an English translation, certified under oath by a qualified interpreter.”]) Further no basis has been stated in the declarations to explain how Defendants’ conduct caused these personal property damages. If the receipts are for replacement of personal property, Plaintiffs have failed to explain what items of personal property that they owned had to be replaced and why.

Plaintiff is to file a default judgment package, including a proposed judgment on form JUD-100 and deliver a courtesy copy to Department 26 within 3 weeks.

The OSC re entry of default judgment is continued to May 12, 2020 at 8:30 am.

Court Clerk to give notice.