On 01/13/2016 ROSEMARY THOMPSON filed a Property - Other Real Property lawsuit against O C INTERIOR SERVICES LLC. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is DANIEL S. MURPHY. The case status is Disposed - Judgment Entered.
****7078
01/13/2016
Disposed - Judgment Entered
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
DANIEL S. MURPHY
THOMPSON ROSEMARY
RICHARDSON LOUISE LORENE
DOES 1 TO 10
THOMPSON DOLORES
O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES L.L.C.
BASKEZ ARMONDO
LIVINGSTON DOLORES
JOHNSON JULIUS ESQ.
STEWART JULIAS ESQ.
MIRHOSSEINI ALI R. ESQ.
1/13/2016: SUMMONS
2/10/2016: NOTICE RE: CONTINUANCE OF HEARING
4/4/2016: Minute Order
4/4/2016: FIRST AMENDED SUMMONS
7/21/2016: Unknown
8/22/2016: Unknown
9/9/2016: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
12/29/2016: DEFENDANT O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES, LLC'S NOTICE OF FAILURE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANT O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES, LLC'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
1/19/2017: DEFENDANTS LOUISE LORENE RICHARDSON AND DOLORES THOMPSON'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION; ETC
1/30/2017: Minute Order
2/15/2017: NOTICE OF RULING:
2/16/2017: VERIFIED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR: 1. QUIET TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION; ETC
2/16/2017: SECOND AMENDED SUMMONS
3/10/2017: JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AFTER SUSTAINING OF DEFENDANT O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES, LLC'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
3/14/2017: Minute Order
3/17/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE
4/28/2017: MINUTE ORDER
5/16/2017: JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AFTER SUSTAINING OF DEFENDANT O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES, LLC?S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF?S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
at 08:30 AM in Department 32; Non-Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated
at 08:30 AM in Department 32; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated
Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint); Filed by Louise Lorene Richardson (Defendant); Dolores Thompson (Defendant); Dolores Livingston (Legacy Party)
PROOF OF SERVICE OF JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
at 1:30 PM in Department 32; Court Order (Court Order; Court makes order) -
Judgment
Judgment
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL FOLLOWING SUSTAINING OF DEMURRER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND [CODE CIV. PROC., 581, SUBD. (1)(2)I
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AFTER SUSTAINING OF DEFENDANT O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES, LLC S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Minute Order
Ex-Parte Application; Filed by Rosemary Thompson (Plaintiff)
EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAIMNG ORDER RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES;
NOTICE RE: CONTINUANCE OF HEARING
Notice Re: Continuance of Hearing and Order; Filed by Clerk
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Notice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk
ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER
SUMMONS
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR: 1. QUIET TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION
Complaint; Filed by Rosemary Thompson (Plaintiff)
1502 N. Broadway Supertor © ?,“f’}f,’s‘f:g‘i'&f“‘“ Santa Ana, CA 92706 , : Telephone: (714)560-9100 MAR 10 2017 Facsimile: (714)560-9120 . ’ ST | by_ellpdll] gy Do
Attorney for Defendants, O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES, LLC. AND ARMONDO VASEQUEZ (erroneously sued as
) Case No.: BC 607078
ROSEMARY THOMPSON, ) Plaintiff, ' )
vs. ) DISMISSAL AFTER SUSTAINING OF
DEFENDANT O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES, O.C. INTERIOR SERVICES, LLC., a Limited) LLC’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S Liability Corporation; ARMANDO BASKEZ, ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT an individual, LOUISE LORENE ) | ’]/ RICHARDSON, an individual, DOLORES ) /)? THOMPSON aka DOLORES LIVINGSTON, ) an individual, and All Persons Claiming Any ) Complaint Filed: April 4, 2016 Legal or Equitable Property Described in the ) Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff’s Title, or Any ) Cloud On Plaintiffs Title Thereto AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE;
Defendants
BY Fax
N’ e’
The Court on January 6, 2017, having sustained Defendant O.C. Interior Services LLC’s Demurrer to Plaintiff Rosemary Thompson’s First Amended Complaint filed in the above entitled action, and g.ranting 30 days, or until February 10, 2017 for Plaintiff to amend her First Amended Complaint, which Plaintiff has failed to do, and having ordered that Plaintiff's failure in filing an