This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 08/14/2019 at 09:38:36 (UTC).

ROBERTO GOMEZ VS REAL ESTATE CONSULTING & SERVICES INC ET AL

Case Summary

On 05/05/2014 ROBERTO GOMEZ filed an Other lawsuit against REAL ESTATE CONSULTING SERVICES INC. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are FREDERICK C. SHALLER, STEPHANIE M. BOWICK, HOLLY E. KENDIG and ELAINE LU. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****4728

  • Filing Date:

    05/05/2014

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

FREDERICK C. SHALLER

STEPHANIE M. BOWICK

HOLLY E. KENDIG

ELAINE LU

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

GOMEZ ROBERTO

Defendants and Respondents

DOES 1 THROUGH 50

GONZALEZ TERESA

KIMBALL TIREY & ST. JOHN LLP

REAL ESTATE CONSULTING & SERVICES INC.

SCHLERT KARL P.

SCHLECHT KARL P.

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

BEWLEY LASSLEBEN & MILLER LLP

ANDERSON LEIGHTON MORSE

BRADY DAVID ALAN

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

THE ALBERTS FIRM APC

WATSON HOUSTON M. II

HOLLINS LAW

KIMBALL TIREY & ST. JOHN LLP

NEVERS GARY W. ESQ.

LAYFIELD & WALLACE

ALBERTS FIRM APC

ORTIZ ABEL WILLIAM

SCHLECHT KARL PATRICK

LANDERS THOMAS FRED JR

GORDON ELI ALLEN

STRICKLAND LEAH SUZANNE II

 

Court Documents

Proof of Service

1/4/2018: Proof of Service

DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL-CIVIL

7/20/2018: DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL-CIVIL

Other -

10/1/2018: Other -

Minute Order

12/6/2018: Minute Order

Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice

12/7/2018: Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice

Declaration

2/25/2019: Declaration

DEFENDANTS REAL ESTATE CONSULTING & SERVICES, INC. AND TERESA GONZALEZ?S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

6/6/2014: DEFENDANTS REAL ESTATE CONSULTING & SERVICES, INC. AND TERESA GONZALEZ?S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS

6/26/2014: PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

8/18/2014: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

NOTICE OF LODGEMENT IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE (C.C.P. ? 425.16)

9/5/2014: NOTICE OF LODGEMENT IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE (C.C.P. ? 425.16)

DEFENDANTS KIMBALL, TIREY & ST. JOHN, LLP?S AND KARL P. SCHLECHT?S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

9/11/2014: DEFENDANTS KIMBALL, TIREY & ST. JOHN, LLP?S AND KARL P. SCHLECHT?S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

DECLARATION OF KARL P. SCHLECHT IN SUPPORT OF KIMBALL, TIREY & ST. JOHN LLP AND KARL P. SCHLECIIT?S SPECIAL R?VIOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF?S COMPLAINT

9/11/2014: DECLARATION OF KARL P. SCHLECHT IN SUPPORT OF KIMBALL, TIREY & ST. JOHN LLP AND KARL P. SCHLECIIT?S SPECIAL R?VIOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF?S COMPLAINT

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY-CIVIL (WITHOUT COURT ORDER)

10/21/2014: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY-CIVIL (WITHOUT COURT ORDER)

OPPOSITION BY PLAINTIFF ROBERTO GOMEZ TO SPECIAL MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

2/3/2015: OPPOSITION BY PLAINTIFF ROBERTO GOMEZ TO SPECIAL MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

CIVIL DEPOSIT

2/4/2015: CIVIL DEPOSIT

DEFENDANTS' KIMBALL, TIREY & ST. JOHN, LLP AND KARL P. SCHLECHT'S REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

2/9/2015: DEFENDANTS' KIMBALL, TIREY & ST. JOHN, LLP AND KARL P. SCHLECHT'S REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Minute Order

2/18/2015: Minute Order

RULING

4/13/2015: RULING

105 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 07/27/2020
  • Hearingat 09:30 AM in Department 26 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/10/2020
  • Hearingat 09:00 AM in Department 26 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status Conference

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/25/2019
  • Docketat 09:30 AM in Department 26, Elaine Lu, Presiding; Trial Setting Conference - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/25/2019
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Trial Setting Conference)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/01/2019
  • Docketat 09:30 AM in Department 26, Elaine Lu, Presiding; Non-Jury Trial - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/19/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 26, Elaine Lu, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment - Not Held - Taken Off Calendar by Party

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/08/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 26, Elaine Lu, Presiding; Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (of entire case for Plaintiff's failure to appear on 02/25/19 and for failure to prosecute.) - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/08/2019
  • DocketNotice of Limited Scope Representation

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/08/2019
  • DocketResponse (to Order to show Cause re: failure to appear; and brief regarding five year statute); Filed by Roberto Gomez (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/08/2019
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal of entire case for Plaintif...)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
210 More Docket Entries
  • 06/06/2014
  • DocketAnswer; Filed by Real Estate Consulting & Services, Inc. (Defendant); Teresa Gonzalez (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/29/2014
  • DocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/29/2014
  • DocketNOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/14/2014
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/14/2014
  • DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Roberto Gomez (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/14/2014
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/14/2014
  • DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Roberto Gomez (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/05/2014
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by Roberto Gomez (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/05/2014
  • DocketCOMPLAINT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/05/2014
  • DocketSUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC544728    Hearing Date: April 29, 2020    Dept: 26

IN LIGHT OF THE RECENT CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC, UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, DEPARTMENT 26 WILL ALLOW APPEARANCES BY COURT CALL FOR ALL HEARINGS OTHER THAN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIAL. Thus, the court will allow telephonic appearance by Court Call for the instant motion.

Plaintiff Roberto Gomez’s counsel, T. Sean Butler (“Counsel”), moves to be relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff Roberto Gomez (“Client”). Counsel filed the instant motion to be relieved as counsel on February 10, 2020.

Counsel has filed forms MC-051 and MC-052 and has lodged with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form MC-053 pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1362.

Counsel served Client by mail. Counsel has also served this motion on all other parties in the case.

Counsel states that was unable to obtain the consent of the client, that they are unable to meaningfully communicate, and there has been a breakdown in the attorney client relationship

Counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing and submit (1) proof of timely service of the Court’s March 18, 2020 minute order or other notice of the continued (April 29, 2020) hearing date on all parties, including Client and Defendants’ Counsel; and (2) a corrected proposed order on form MC-053. Based on the notice of motion and the declaration filed by Counsel, the Court is inclined to grant the motion. However, Counsel must demonstrate that all parties (including Client) have received timely notice of the continued (April 29, 2020) hearing date by electronically filing a proof of service before the hearing. In addition, the proposed order lodged with the Court has not been properly completed, and thus, Counsel must electronically file a corrected order on form MC-053.

The proposed order must list the continued (April 29, 2020) hearing date in the caption. The proposed order must also identify all upcoming hearings and list the address of the Court in all items. The Court’s records show the following upcoming hearings, which should all be listed in the proposed order:

Counsel is responsible for determining if there are any other hearings scheduled or due dates for discovery for this case, including any motions hearings, which must all be listed in the proposed order. For each hearing, Counsel must state the date, time, and location of the hearing including the address and Department number as follows: “111 N. Hill St., Dept. 26, L.A., CA 90012.” For each due date for discovery, Counsel must identify the nature of the discovery responses that are outstanding, the due date, and the address where verified responses must be sent.

Provided that Counsel presents a proof of service of notice of the continued (April 29, 2020) hearing date and a corrected proposed order at or before the hearing on this motion, the motion to be relieved as counsel will be granted. Otherwise, the motion will be continued or denied without prejudice.

Counsel should note that after the order is signed, the order will only become effective upon the filing of a proof of service of a signed copy of the order on Plaintiff. Counsel will remain the attorney of record until Counsel files with the Court proof of service of the signed order. Counsel will be ordered to serve a copy of the signed order (MC-053) on Plaintiff within three days.

Moving Counsel is ordered to provide notice of this order and file proof of service of such.