This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 07/02/2019 at 08:57:23 (UTC).

JESUS MARTIN VAZQUEZ ET AL VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL

Case Summary

On 11/02/2015 JESUS MARTIN VAZQUEZ filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Norwalk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are BRIAN F. GASDIA, RAUL A. SAHAGUN, MARGARET MILLER BERNAL, MASTER CALENDAR and LORI ANN FOURNIER. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****9968

  • Filing Date:

    11/02/2015

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Norwalk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

BRIAN F. GASDIA

RAUL A. SAHAGUN

MARGARET MILLER BERNAL

MASTER CALENDAR

LORI ANN FOURNIER

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs and Petitioners

VAZQUEZ JESUS MARTIN

VAZQUEZ MARTIN

Defendants and Respondents

DOES 1-100

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Plaintiff and Guardian Ad Litem

VAZQUEZ MARTIN

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

BIREN LAW GROUP

BIREN MATTHEW BENNETT

BIREN ANDREW G.

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

ITKIN YOSEF Y.

RUIZ RODOLFO FLORENTINO

VANDERFORD & RUIZ LLP

 

Court Documents

Declaration

12/18/2017: Declaration

Legacy Document

3/13/2018: Legacy Document

Legacy Document

4/24/2018: Legacy Document

Minute Order

4/24/2018: Minute Order

Motion re:

7/20/2018: Motion re:

Motion for Summary Judgment

8/15/2018: Motion for Summary Judgment

Order

10/31/2018: Order

Minute Order

12/17/2018: Minute Order

Ex Parte Application

1/18/2019: Ex Parte Application

Reply

4/16/2019: Reply

Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses

5/29/2019: Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses

SUMMONS ON FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

5/5/2016: SUMMONS ON FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

7/27/2016: DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

DECLARATION OF YOSEF Y. ITKIN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION, AND AN ORDER IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAIN

10/20/2016: DECLARATION OF YOSEF Y. ITKIN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION, AND AN ORDER IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAIN

DECLARATION OF YOSEF Y. ITKIN IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF?S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

6/19/2017: DECLARATION OF YOSEF Y. ITKIN IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF?S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OBJECTION TO DECLARATION OF MATTHEW B.F. BIREN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES UMFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTTFF

6/29/2017: DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OBJECTION TO DECLARATION OF MATTHEW B.F. BIREN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES UMFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTTFF

NOTICE OF RULING RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

7/3/2017: NOTICE OF RULING RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Minute Order

8/31/2017: Minute Order

138 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/18/2019
  • at 09:30 AM in Department C; Nunc Pro Tunc Order

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/18/2019
  • at 09:00 AM in Department C; Ruling on Submitted Matter

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/18/2019
  • Minute Order ((Nunc Pro Tunc Order)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/18/2019
  • Order (nunc pro tunc Order of 11/29/18); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/18/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Ruling on Submitted Matter)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/18/2019
  • Order (ruling on matter submitted); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/29/2019
  • Separate Statement (in support of Motion to Compel Further Discovery - Production of Documents); Filed by LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/29/2019
  • Declaration (of Vanessa Morales re: Motion to Compel Further Responses of Jesus Vazques - Production of Documents); Filed by JESUS MARTIN VAZQUEZ (Plaintiff); MARTIN VAZQUEZ (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/29/2019
  • Separate Statement (in Support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses by Plaintif to Request For Admission, Set Three); Filed by LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/29/2019
  • Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses; Filed by LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
368 More Docket Entries
  • 11/13/2015
  • Application ; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/05/2015
  • NOTICE OF REJECTION - APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/02/2015
  • Application - Miscellaneous (FOR APPOINTMENT OF G.A.L. ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/02/2015
  • Application ; Filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/02/2015
  • Complaint filed-Summons Issued (PI; REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL; 11/02/15 CCH524880081 $435.00); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/02/2015
  • COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES; REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/02/2015
  • Application ; Filed by Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/02/2015
  • Complaint filed-Summons Issued; Filed by JESUS MARTIN VAZQUEZ (Plaintiff); MARTIN VAZQUEZ (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/02/2015
  • APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM - CIVIL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/02/2015
  • Complaint; Filed by JESUS MARTIN VAZQUEZ (Plaintiff); MARTIN VAZQUEZ (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC599968    Hearing Date: November 26, 2019    Dept: SEC

VAZQUEZ, ET AL. v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

CASE NO.: BC599968

HEARING: 11/26/19

Calendar #5

TENTATIVE ORDER

Plaintiff Vazquez’s motion for order appointing discovery referee is DENIED.

Opposing Party to give NOTICE.

Plaintiff Vazquez moves for the appointment of a discovery referee.

(a) When the parties do not consent, the court may, upon the written motion of any party, or of its own motion, appoint a referee in the following cases pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 640: (1) When the trial of an issue of fact requires the examination of a long account on either side; in which case the referees may be directed to hear and decide the whole issue, or report upon any specific question of fact involved therein. (2) When the taking of an account is necessary for the information of the court before judgment, or for carrying a judgment or order into effect. (3) When a question of fact, other than upon the pleadings, arises upon motion or otherwise, in any stage of the action. (4) When it is necessary for the information of the court in a special proceeding. (5) When the court in any pending action determines that it is necessary for the court to appoint a referee to hear and determine any and all discovery motions and disputes relevant to discovery in the action and to report findings and make a recommendation thereon. (CCP 639.)

The court finds that a discovery referee is not necessary in this instance. Discovery is closed, except for previously noticed depositions and pending written discovery propounded by both sides. (Notice of Court’s Order filed on 10/1/19.) The remaining motions on calendar are 3 motions to compel further responses filed by LAUSD set for 12/5/19, 3 motions to compel depositions filed by Plaintiff set for 1/23/20, and a motion to compel further responses set for 2/4/20. The current motions on calendar do not support the extraordinary remedy of a discovery referee and the costs associated with such appointment.

Motion is DENIED.