On 10/01/2009 INHALE SOLUTIONS, INC filed an Other - Injunction lawsuit against KATHERINE BRYAN. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are PATRICK T. MADDEN, MICHAEL P. VICENCIA, ROSS KLEIN, JOSEPH E. DILORETO and MARK C. KIM. The case status is Disposed - Dismissed.
****3600
10/01/2009
Disposed - Dismissed
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
PATRICK T. MADDEN
MICHAEL P. VICENCIA
ROSS KLEIN
JOSEPH E. DILORETO
MARK C. KIM
INHALE SOLUTIONS INC
KATHERINE BRYAN
DOES 1 TO 10
KB2 CONSULTING LLC
KRISTIE BRYAN
BRYAN KATHERINE
DRACUP & PATTERSON A LAW CORP
BRYAN KRISTIE
MARY MEGAN WILLER
KAREN WILLER
INHALE SOLUTIONS INC
DOES 11 THORUGH 50
MATTHEW D WILLER
MEMCOM PERIPHERALS INC
WILLER KAREN
WILLER MARY MEGAN
WILLER MATTHEW D
JOSEFSBERG HENRY J.
FERNANDEZ & FERNANDEZ ALP
GLENN R. LEWIS
DRACUP & PATTERSON A LAW CORP
5/15/2020: Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest
5/19/2020: Motion to Tax Costs
6/2/2020: Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest - MEMORANDUM OF COSTS AFTER JUDGMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CREDIT, AND DECLARATION OF ACCRUED INTEREST AM
6/30/2020: Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information
7/16/2020: Challenge To Judicial Officer - Peremptory (170.6)
7/17/2020: Certificate of Mailing for - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FOR (COURT ORDER) OF 07/17/2020
7/17/2020: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (COURT ORDER)
9/3/2020: Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint)
9/18/2020: Order - ORDER STRIKING STATEMENT OF DISQUALIFICATION; VERIFIED ANSWER
9/28/2020: Request - REQUEST FOR DISQUALIFYING JUDGE
9/28/2020: Notice - NOTICE OF ORDER STRIKING STATEMENT
9/29/2020: Order - ORDER STRIKING SECOND STATEMENT OF DISQUALIFICATION; VERIFIED ANSWER
9/29/2020: Certificate of Mailing for - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FOR [ORDER STRIKING SECOND STATEMENT OF DISQUALIFICATION; VERIFIED ANSWER]
11/16/2020: Request for Judicial Notice
12/1/2020: Other - - TENTATIVE RULING AND ORDER
7/16/2018: Declaration -
7/16/2018: Other - - Supplemental Memorandum
7/16/2018: Proof of Service (not Summons and Complaint) -
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department S27, Mark C. Kim, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Tax Costs (of Cross Defendants Inhale Solutions, Inc. and Mattew Willer because Said Amounts Claimed for Items 1(a)(7) and 1(b) are Excessive as Item 1(a)(7) are Not Previously Allowed as to Item 1(b) and Prohibited by Statute) - Held - Motion Granted
DocketOrder Appointing Court Approved Reporter as Official Reporter Pro Tempore ((Connie Silva, CSR: 11460)); Filed by Clerk
DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Motion to Tax Costs of Cross Defendants Inhale Sol...)); Filed by Clerk
DocketCertificate of Mailing for ((Hearing on Motion to Tax Costs of Cross Defendants Inhale Sol...) of 12/01/2020); Filed by Clerk
DocketTentative Ruling and Order; Filed by Clerk
DocketOpposition (motion to tax or strike costs); Filed by KATHERINE BRYAN (Legacy Party); KRISTIE BRYAN (Legacy Party)
DocketRequest for Judicial Notice; Filed by KATHERINE BRYAN (Legacy Party); KRISTIE BRYAN (Legacy Party)
DocketNotice (of lodgment of exhibits); Filed by KATHERINE BRYAN (Legacy Party); KRISTIE BRYAN (Legacy Party)
DocketProof of Service by Mail; Filed by MATTHEW D WILLER (Cross-Defendant)
DocketCertificate of Mailing for ([Order Striking Second Statement of Disqualification; Verified Answer]); Filed by Clerk
DocketDeclaration; Filed by INHALE SOLUTIONS, INC (Legacy Party)
DocketMinute order entered: 2009-10-06 00:00:00; Filed by Clerk
DocketDeclaration; Filed by INHALE SOLUTIONS, INC (Legacy Party)
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department B; Ex-Parte Proceedings (Ex Parte Application; Matter is continued) -
DocketOrder
DocketMinute order entered: 2009-10-05 00:00:00; Filed by Clerk
DocketDeclaration; Filed by INHALE SOLUTIONS, INC (Legacy Party)
DocketEx-Parte Application; Filed by INHALE SOLUTIONS, INC (Legacy Party)
DocketSummons; Filed by INHALE SOLUTIONS, INC (Legacy Party)
DocketComplaint; Filed by null
Case Number: NC053600 Hearing Date: December 01, 2020 Dept: S27
Cross-Complainants secured a judgment against Cross-Defendant in 2012. On 4/19/18, Cross-Complainants filed a memorandum of costs pursuant to which they sought to recover attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $87,045. The Court, on 9/19/18, found Cross-Complainants were entitled to recover attorneys’ fees incurred post-judgment, and found their attorneys’ claimed rates reasonable. The Court found many of the fees were unreasonable in nature and amount, and reduced the fees to $17,500.
On 5/15/20, Cross-Complainants filed a memorandum of costs after judgment, acknowledgment of credit, and declaration of accrued interest. The memorandum indicates prior allowed costs were in the amount of $187,034.50, and seeks an award of $77,533.35 in attorneys’ fees incurred between 3/02/16 and 4/14/18.
On 5/19/20, Cross-Defendant filed a motion to tax costs, correctly noting that (a) the Court did not previously award costs in the amount indicated on the memorandum, and (b) all of the attorneys’ fees claimed by way of the memorandum were the subject of the motion decided on 9/19/18.
On 6/02/20, in response to the motion, Cross-Complainants filed a corrected memorandum of costs. In their corrected memorandum, they indicate they are seeking to recover $35,331.02 in attorneys’ fees incurred between 10/2018 and 04/2020.
The motion to tax costs is directed at the 5/15/20 memorandum, and is granted. It is granted because Cross-Complainants concede the costs claimed in the memorandum are not proper.
The Court is making no ruling on the 6/02/20 memorandum of costs, as Cross-Defendant has not filed a motion to tax those costs. The Court’s JA will process the 6/02/20 memorandum per the Rules of Court.
Cross-Defendant is ordered to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at gdcdepts27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar. If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If the parties do not submit on the tentative, they should arrange to appear remotely.