This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 08/14/2019 at 08:43:25 (UTC).

FLEET LOGIC, LLC VS. TWENTY6 LETTERS CORP.

Case Summary

On 10/04/2016 FLEET LOGIC, LLC filed a Contract - Other Contract lawsuit against TWENTY6 LETTERS CORP. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Norwalk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are LORI ANN FOURNIER, MASTER CALENDAR and MARGARET MILLER BERNAL. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****5842

  • Filing Date:

    10/04/2016

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Contract - Other Contract

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Norwalk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

LORI ANN FOURNIER

MASTER CALENDAR

MARGARET MILLER BERNAL

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

FLEET LOGIC LLC

VELOCITY TRUCK RENTAL & LEASING

Defendants

TWENTY6 LETTERS CORP. A NEVADA CORP.

CHILDRESS TIM AN INDIVIDUAL

CHILDRESS PAIGE

CHILDRESS TIM

CHILDRESS PAIGE AN INDIVIDUAL

CHILDRESS AN INDIVIDUAL TIM

CHILDRESS AN INDIVIDUAL PAIGE

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

THE VANDERPOOL LAW FIRM

TOVAR HEATHER ANN

Defendant Attorney

WILLIAM Y. SUNG

 

Court Documents

Minute Order

6/18/2019: Minute Order

Notice of Ruling

6/19/2019: Notice of Ruling

Order

6/28/2019: Order

Legacy Document

12/29/2016: Legacy Document

Statement of Damages (Personal Injury or Wrongful Death)

12/29/2016: Statement of Damages (Personal Injury or Wrongful Death)

Notice of Entry of Judgment

1/17/2017: Notice of Entry of Judgment

Legacy Document

2/21/2017: Legacy Document

Order on Court Fee Waiver (Superior Court)

12/4/2017: Order on Court Fee Waiver (Superior Court)

Legacy Document

3/1/2018: Legacy Document

Substitution of Attorney

7/16/2018: Substitution of Attorney

Notice of Motion

8/2/2018: Notice of Motion

Motion to Compel

8/3/2018: Motion to Compel

Motion to Compel

8/3/2018: Motion to Compel

Motion to Compel

8/3/2018: Motion to Compel

Legacy Document

9/13/2018: Legacy Document

Legacy Document

9/13/2018: Legacy Document

Opposition

10/26/2018: Opposition

Declaration

6/4/2019: Declaration

135 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 03/23/2020
  • Hearingat 09:30 AM in Department F at 12720 Norwalk Blvd., Norwalk, CA 90650; Jury Trial

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/09/2020
  • Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department F at 12720 Norwalk Blvd., Norwalk, CA 90650; Final Status Conference

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/06/2020
  • Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department F at 12720 Norwalk Blvd., Norwalk, CA 90650; Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/04/2019
  • Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department Legacy at 12720 Norwalk Blvd., Norwalk, CA 90650; Non-Appearance Case Review

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/05/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department F, Margaret Miller Bernal, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Party's Motion

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/26/2019
  • DocketNotice (of Termination or Modification of Stay); Filed by FLEET LOGIC, LLC (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/09/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department F, Margaret Miller Bernal, Presiding; Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC) - Not Held - Continued - Party's Motion

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/28/2019
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department F, Margaret Miller Bernal, Presiding; Hearing on Ex Parte Application (to Vacate and Continue Mandatory Settlement Conference, Trial and All Trial Related Dates, Including Discovery; Declaration of Heather A. Tovar) - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/28/2019
  • DocketDefendant Paige Childress's Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Vacate and Continue Trial, Mandatory Settlement Conference and All Related Dates; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; Declarations in Support; Filed by Paige Childress, an individual (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/28/2019
  • DocketNotice of Ruling; Filed by FLEET LOGIC, LLC (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
269 More Docket Entries
  • 10/11/2016
  • DocketRtn of Service of Summons & Compl (BY SUBSTITUTED SERVICE ON 10/11/16 Affadavit of Reasonable Diligence attached ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/11/2016
  • DocketRtn of Service of Summons & Compl (BY PERSONAL SERVICE ON 10/11/16 ); Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/11/2016
  • DocketRtn of Service of Summons & Compl; Filed by FLEET LOGIC, LLC (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/04/2016
  • DocketCivil Case Cover Sheet; Filed by FLEET LOGIC, LLC (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/04/2016
  • DocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/04/2016
  • DocketSummons; Filed by Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/04/2016
  • DocketComplaint filed-Summons Issued; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/04/2016
  • DocketSummons Filed; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/04/2016
  • DocketNotice-Case Management Conference; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/04/2016
  • DocketComplaint filed-Summons Issued; Filed by VELOCITY TRUCK RENTAL & LEASING (Legacy Party); FLEET LOGIC, LLC (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: VC065842    Hearing Date: December 10, 2019    Dept: SEC

FLEET LOGIC, LLC v. TWENTY6 LETTERS CORP., et al.

CASE NO.:  VC065842

JUDGE: OLIVIA ROSALES

HEARING 12/10/19

#10

TENTATIVE ORDER

Defendants Tim and Paige Childress’s motion to set aside and vacate ruling re sanctions is DENIED.

Plaintiff to give NOTICE.

Defendants Tim and Paige Childress move to set aside and vacate the ruling re sanctions pursuant to CCP 473.

The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. (CCP 473(b).)

Defendants contend that their previous motions to quash were not made in bad faith and that the court “completely disregarded the operative motion itself.” (Motion, 4:25.) Defendants are essentially disagreeing with the court’s prior order. Such does not establish mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. Further, even if this motion is construed as a motion for reconsideration, the motion would be untimely. CCP 1008 requires that the motion be filed within 10 days of the order. The Order was issued on 10/10/19, but the motion was not filed until 11/8/19.

Further, Defendants contend the court denied their motions based solely on the lack of a separate statement. However, as this court stated in its 10/10/19 Order, Defendants did not attach the subpoenas at issue, and the court had no way of knowing what documents are being demanded or objected to. For this reason, the motions were denied. Defense counsel appeared at the hearing and failed to address this court's concerns.

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.