This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 07/08/2019 at 21:20:44 (UTC).

EXECUTIVE PERILS INC VS MARIA HALE

Case Summary

On 02/02/2015 EXECUTIVE PERILS INC filed a Labor - Other Labor lawsuit against MARIA HALE. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are HOLLY E. KENDIG and ELAINE LU. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****1034

  • Filing Date:

    02/02/2015

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Labor - Other Labor

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judges

HOLLY E. KENDIG

ELAINE LU

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs and Cross Defendants

EXECUTIVE PERILS INC.

MAGNUSON MICHAEL D. DOE 1

R-T SPECIALTY INSURANCE SERVICE LLC DOE2

MAGNUSON MICHAEL

Defendants and Respondents

DOES 1 THROUGH 20

HALE MARIA

MAGNUSON MICHAEL D. DOE 1

R-T SPECIALTY INSURANCE SERVICE LLC DOE2

MAGNUSON MICHAEL

Defendants and Cross Plaintiffs

HALE MARIA

MORENO CRISTINA

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

THE LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS M. FERLAUTO APC

MCGONIGLE TIMOTHY D

GUERRA JASON ERIC

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

BOMAN CHRISTOPHER J. ESQ.

ASHKINDADZE REGINA ESQ.

BOMAN CHRISTOPHER J

SPURLEY REGINA ASHKINADZE

OLSEN AARON FRANKLIN ESQ.

Defendant and Cross Plaintiff Attorneys

ASHKINDADZE REGINA ESQ.

SPURLEY REGINA ASHKINADZE ESQ.

 

Court Documents

PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO R-T SPECIALTY INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC AND MICHAEL D. MAGNUSON'S EX PARTE REQUEST FOR THE COURT TO SUA SPONTE AND SUMMARILY CUT-OFF DISCOVERY

12/29/2017: PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO R-T SPECIALTY INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC AND MICHAEL D. MAGNUSON'S EX PARTE REQUEST FOR THE COURT TO SUA SPONTE AND SUMMARILY CUT-OFF DISCOVERY

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

4/9/2018: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

5/21/2018: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

DEFENDANT MARIA HALE'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS LL SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

6/19/2018: DEFENDANT MARIA HALE'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS LL SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

Notice

2/20/2019: Notice

Separate Statement

2/20/2019: Separate Statement

Substitution of Attorney

6/6/2019: Substitution of Attorney

Motion in Limine

7/2/2019: Motion in Limine

DEFENDANT MARIA HALES' NOTICE UF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS ND AUTHORITIES

3/30/2015: DEFENDANT MARIA HALES' NOTICE UF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS ND AUTHORITIES

DEFENDANT MARIA HALES' NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

6/18/2015: DEFENDANT MARIA HALES' NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

DEFENDANT MICHAEL MAGNUSON'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

7/13/2015: DEFENDANT MICHAEL MAGNUSON'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

DEFENDANT MARIA HALES' NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ETC

9/24/2015: DEFENDANT MARIA HALES' NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ETC

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MARIA HALE'S DEMURRER TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

9/24/2015: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MARIA HALE'S DEMURRER TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

ANSWER OF CROSS-DEFENDANT EXECUTIVE PERILS, INC. TO CROSS-COMPLAINT

11/30/2015: ANSWER OF CROSS-DEFENDANT EXECUTIVE PERILS, INC. TO CROSS-COMPLAINT

CIVIL DEPOSIT

8/4/2016: CIVIL DEPOSIT

Minute Order

8/23/2016: Minute Order

Proof of Service

3/28/2017: Proof of Service

JOINT STIPULATION TO PROVIDE DEFENDANT MICHAEL D. MAGNUSON LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

6/12/2017: JOINT STIPULATION TO PROVIDE DEFENDANT MICHAEL D. MAGNUSON LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

95 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 07/02/2019
  • Motion in Limine (B to Exclude Plaintiff from Presenting Any Evidence, Testimony, or Argument as to Evidentiary Determinations Made by the Court in Regards to Defendant Maria Hale's Motion for Summary Judgment); Filed by Michael Magnuson (Defendant); R-T Specialty Insurance Service, LLC DOE2 (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2019
  • Joinder to Motion (in Limine No. D by Defendants R-T Specialty and Damien Magnuson); Filed by CRISTINA MORENO (Cross-Complainant); Maria Hale (Cross-Complainant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2019
  • Motion in Limine (D to Exclude Expert Witness Testimony from Brad Maryman and Joseph Greenfield); Filed by Michael Magnuson (Defendant); R-T Specialty Insurance Service, LLC DOE2 (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2019
  • Motion in Limine (C to Exclude Evidence of Defendant's Financial Condition Unless and Until Plaintiff Has Proven a Prima Facie Case for Punitive Damages); Filed by Michael Magnuson (Defendant); R-T Specialty Insurance Service, LLC DOE2 (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2019
  • Motion in Limine (A to Preclude Plaintiff from Introducing to the Jury Previously Produced Bates Labeled Documents Designated "Confidential," "Highly Confidential," or "Attorneys Eyes Only" by the Parties During Discovery); Filed by Michael Magnuson (Defendant); R-T Specialty Insurance Service, LLC DOE2 (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2019
  • Motion in Limine (No. AC to exclude the "One More" email); Filed by Maria Hale (Cross-Complainant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2019
  • Motion in Limine (No. AB to exclude evidence related to dismissed claims); Filed by Maria Hale (Cross-Complainant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2019
  • Motion in Limine (No. AA to exclude defenses based on overtime exemptions); Filed by Maria Hale (Cross-Complainant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/07/2019
  • Substitution of Attorney; Filed by Executive Perils, Inc. (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/06/2019
  • Substitution of Attorney; Filed by Executive Perils, Inc. (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
194 More Docket Entries
  • 05/21/2015
  • AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/21/2015
  • Amendment to Complaint; Filed by Maria Hale (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/21/2015
  • Amendment to Complaint; Filed by Executive Perils, Inc. (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/30/2015
  • DEFENDANT MARIA HALES' NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/30/2015
  • DEFENDANT MARIA HALES' NOTICE UF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS ND AUTHORITIES

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/30/2015
  • Demurrer; Filed by Maria Hale (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/30/2015
  • Demurrer; Filed by Maria Hale (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/02/2015
  • Complaint; Filed by null

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/02/2015
  • COMPLAINT FOR: 1) MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS (CC 3426, ET SEQ.); ETC

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/02/2015
  • SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC571034    Hearing Date: February 25, 2020    Dept: 26

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN AND FOR THE county OF LOS ANGELES

EXECUTIVE PERILS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARIA HALE; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO.: BC571034

RULINGS ON OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATIONS FOR JOE BINSFELD AND JON ROQUIERO

Judge: Hon. Elaine Lu

Dept.: 26

Complaint Filed : 02/02/2015

FAC Filed : 05/21/2015

SAC Filed : 08/21/2015

Trial Date : 02/25/2020

MARIA HALE, an individual; CRISTINA MORENO, an individual;

Cross-Complainant,

vs.

EXECUTIVE PERILS, INC., a California corporation; MICHAEL D. MAGNUSON, an individual; R-T SPECIALTY INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC; a California limited liability company; and ROES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Cross-Defendants.

The Court hereby rules as follows on the objections to the deposition transcript designations for Joe Binsfeld and Jon Roquiero:

JOE BINSFELD, VOL. 1

Excerpt No.

Page-Line Designation

Time Designation

Objections

Counter-Designation

Objections

Ruling

1

8:6-13

10:33:17 – 10:33:33

1

2

8:23-9:7

10:34:01-10:34:27

1

9:8 to 14

1

3

10:14-10:22

10:36:02-10:36:37

1

11:4-9

1

4

12:1-13:3

10:38:01-10:39:25

1

5

15:16-23

10:42:40-10:43:00

1

15:9-11

1

6

16:12-13

10:43:38-10:43:45

1

7

16:20-17:6

10:44:08-10:45:09

1

8

17:11-18:8

10:45:16-10:46:29

1

9

18:18-19:18

10:46:56-10:48:25

18:18-19:18 (NR, R, N, 352)

Overruled

10

20:15-20

10:49:19-10:49:36

1

11

21:8-21:14

10:50:11-10:50:30

21:8-14 (R, NR, 352)

Overruled

12

21:17-22:6

10:50:51-10:51:42

1

13

22:24-23:16

10:52:50-10:54:01

1

14

23:18- 24:6

10:54:04-10:54:39

1

15

24:16-25:7

10:55:04-10:55:49

25: 2-7 (R, 352)

Overruled

16

25:14-25:21

10:56:09-10:56:37

1

17

29:10-29:13

11:02:20-11:02:24

1

18

31:23-33:19

11:05:36-11:08:46

1

19

33:25-34:9

11:09:26-11:09:59

32:23-33:19 (R. 352); 33:25-34:20) (R, 352)

Overruled; Overruled

20

34:11-34:20

11:10:05-11:10:29

1

21

35:4-35:6

11:11:26-11:11:53

1

22

35:15-36:25

11:12:34-11:14:37

1

23

37:8-37:10

11:15:26-11:15:31

1

24

38:9-39:3

11:16:50-11:17:56

38:9-39:3 (R. 352)

Overruled

25

39:8-16

11:18:15-11:18:39

39:8-16 (L, R)

47:18-48:5; 59:25-60:11

Sustained as to 39:8-12; Overruled as to 39:13-16

26

59:1-23

12:13:26-12:14:54

1

27

64:7-16

12:21:29-12:22:02

1

28

65:1-65:18

12:23:25-12:24:48

1

65:19-66:2

1

29

68:11-13

12:30:44-12:30:51

1

JON ROQUIERO, VOL. 1

Excerpt No.

Page-Line Designation

Time Designation

Objections

Counter-Designation

Objections

Ruling

1

6:6-24

09:43:50-09:44:37

1

2

7:5-8:13

09:44:55-09:47:19

1

3

10:12-11:11

09:49:48-09:51:56

1

9:12 -10:11

11:12-12:9

1

4

12:11-13:25

09:52:56-09:54:57

12:12-13:10

(F, S , 352)

Overruled

5

14:1-20

09:54:57-09:56:00

13:22-16:2 (S. H, R, 352)

Sustained as to 14:11-14:13 (“It’s weird. Somebody answered Damien’s phone pretending to be Damien. I don’t know who it is, but”); Sustained as to 15:1-15:3 (“I mean, Dave, he was, you know, as surprised as I was that somebody would be pretending to be Damien.”); Sustained as to 15:4-15:5 (“He let me know that he had left Executive Perils at that time.”) Otherwise overruled as to the balance.

6

14:21-15:9

09:56:00-09:56:48

1

7

15:10-16:2

09:56:48-09:58:50

1

8

16:3-17:8

09:59:32-09:59:57

1

9

17:9-18:2

09:59:43-10:01:01

17:9-21 (R. S. 352

Overruled

10

18:22-20:5

10:03:47-10:06:04

1

11

21:14-20

10:07:58-10:08:28

22:2-8

(L) (S)

Overruled

12

23:24-24:19

10:11:54-10:13:01

1

13

24:20-27:2

10:13:01-10:16:56

26:13 to 23 (L)

Overruled

14

28:15-29:5

10:18:45-10:19:28

28:15- 29:5 (R. 352)

Overruled

15

29:14-33:5

10:19:51-10:24:34

29:14-31:24 (R. N)

32:8 – 33:5 (S,H,R,352)

Overruled; Overruled

16

36:10-39:4

10:30:21-10:34:09

37:4-38:3 (R)

Overruled

DATED: February 22, 2020 ___________________________

Elaine Lu

Judge of the Superior Court