On 10/07/2013 EXECUTIVE CONSULTING INC filed a Contract - Other Contract lawsuit against VAL E KILMER. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is ROLF M. TREU. The case status is Disposed - Judgment Entered.
Disposed - Judgment Entered
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
ROLF M. TREU
EXECUTIVE CONSULTING INC
EXECUTIVE CONSULTING INC.
KILMER VAL E
KILMER V. VAL E.
BLEAU FOX APLC
BLEAU THOMAS PAUL
9/30/2020: Order - ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
11/5/2020: Certificate of Mailing for - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FOR (COURT ORDER) OF 11/05/2020
11/9/2020: Notice - NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
2/20/2014: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT -
2/24/2014: ORDER FOR REMAND
3/3/2014: DEFENDANT VAL E., KILMER?S NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF EXECUTIVE CONSULTING INC.?S COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
3/7/2014: Minute Order -
4/8/2014: PLAINTIFF?S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ETC.
4/8/2014: Minute Order -
4/21/2014: NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF EXECUTIVE CONSULTING INC.?S COMPLAINT
4/30/2014: Minute Order -
6/2/2014: DEFENDANT VAL E. KILMER?S RESPONSE TO COURT?S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNDER CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ? 410.30.
6/4/2014: PLAINTIFF?S REPLY TO DEFENDANT?S RESPONSE TO COURT?S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNDER CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ? 410.30
6/6/2014: DEFENDANT VAL E. KILMER'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF EXECUTIVE COUNSULTING'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
6/13/2014: NOTICE OF ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT VAL E. KILM FR?S OEM IJRRFR TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, HEARING ON TI-IF COURT?S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO CAL CODE CIV. PROC. ? 410.30, AND CAS
7/14/2014: CIVIL DEPOSIT -
7/16/2014: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
10/8/2014: ORDER OF DISMISSAL
DocketMemorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest; Filed by EXECUTIVE CONSULTING, INC., (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketWrit of Execution ((Los Angeles)); Filed by EXECUTIVE CONSULTING, INC., (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketAbstract of Judgment - Civil and Small Claims; Filed by EXECUTIVE CONSULTING, INC., (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketNotice of Rejection - Post Judgment; Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 58; Order to Show Cause Re: (Entry of Judgment) - Not Held - Vacated by CourtRead MoreRead Less
DocketNotice (of Entry of Judgment); Filed by EXECUTIVE CONSULTING, INC., (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
Docketat 4:03 PM in Department 58; Court OrderRead MoreRead Less
DocketMinute Order ( (Court Order)); Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
DocketCertificate of Mailing for ((Court Order) of 11/05/2020); Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
DocketJudgment (Judgment); Filed by EXECUTIVE CONSULTING, INC., (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketDemurrer (TO PLFF'S COMPLAINT; ); Filed by Attorney for Defendant/RespondentRead MoreRead Less
DocketOrder (REMANDING TO CALIF.SUPERIOR COURT; ); Filed by CourtRead MoreRead Less
DocketStatement-Case Management; Filed by Attorney for Defendant/RespondentRead MoreRead Less
DocketNotice (TO STATE CRT.OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT UNDER 28 USC 1441(b) (DIVERSITY); ); Filed by Attorney for Defendant/RespondentRead MoreRead Less
DocketAcknowledgement of Receipt; Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/PetitionerRead MoreRead Less
Docketat 08:30 am in Department 58, Rolf M. Treu, Presiding; OSC-Failure to File Proof of Serv (*CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE*) - Matter is heard, matter continuedRead MoreRead Less
DocketNotice-Case Management Conference; Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
DocketOSC-Failure to File Proof of Serv; Filed by ClerkRead MoreRead Less
DocketComplaint; Filed by EXECUTIVE CONSULTING, INC., (Plaintiff)Read MoreRead Less
DocketComplaintRead MoreRead Less
Case Number: BC523809 Hearing Date: September 30, 2020 Dept: 58
Judge John P. Doyle
Hearing Date: September 30, 2020
Case Name: Executive Consulting, Inc. v. Kilmer, V.
Case No.: BC523809
Matter: Motion to Enforce Settlement
Moving Party: Plaintiff Executive Consulting, Inc.
Responding Party: Unopposed
Tentative Ruling: The Motion to Enforce Settlement is granted.
Plaintiff Executive Consulting, Inc. seeks to enforce a settlement agreement (“SA”) entered into by the parties on September 15, 2014. (Martin Decl., Exhibit A.) The SA required that Defendant tender $50,000 in two installment payments. Defendant was required to pay an additional $10,000 if an installment payment was not received within thirty days from when it was due. Defendant has not made the second installment payment.
The Court is authorized to enter judgment pursuant to the stipulated settlement. (Code Civ. Proc. § 664.6.) In reviewing a motion to enforce a settlement, the Court determines “whether the parties entered into a valid and binding settlement.” (Hines v. Lukes (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1174, 1182.) “A settlement is enforceable under section 664.6 only if the parties agreed to all material settlement terms. [Citations.] The court ruling on the motion may consider the parties’ declarations and other evidence in deciding what terms the parties agreed to, and the court’s factual findings in this regard are reviewed under the substantial evidence standard. [Citations.] If the court determines that the parties entered into an enforceable settlement, it should grant the motion and enter a formal judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.” (Id. at pp. 1182-1183; see also Osumi v. Sutton (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 1355, 1357 [“Strong public policy in favor of the settlement of civil cases gives the trial court, which approves the settlement, the power to enforce it”].)
Because a valid settlement exists between the parties and the Court has retained jurisdiction (Martin Decl., Exhibit A; October 8, 2014, Order of Dismissal), the Motion to Enforce Settlement is granted. (Code Civ. Proc. § 664.6.)