Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 07/11/2021 at 22:49:41 (UTC).

CHRIS CURRY VS ACADEMY POINTE INC ET AL

Case Summary

On 05/20/2016 CHRIS CURRY filed a Civil Right - Other Civil Right lawsuit against ACADEMY POINTE INC. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is GREGORY W. ALARCON. The case status is Disposed - Judgment Entered.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****1282

  • Filing Date:

    05/20/2016

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Judgment Entered

  • Case Type:

    Civil Right - Other Civil Right

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

GREGORY W. ALARCON

 

Party Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner

CURRY CHRIS

Defendants and Respondents

ACADEMY POINTE INC

ANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY

STATEWIDE ENTERPRISES INC

DOES 1-50

STATEWIDE ENTERPRISES INC GF SETTLMT

J.K. RESIDENTIAL SERVICE INC.

Not Classified By Court

TEST PARTY FOR TRUST CONVERSION

PURCELL CYNTHIA

J.K. REALTY INC.

SHELLEY DANA

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

REISMAN & REISMAN

PINE NORMAN HOWARD

Defendant Attorneys

CAMERON PARRY G.

O'MEARA FRANCES ESQ.

CAMERON PARRY GLENN

 

Court Documents

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY -

2/5/2018: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY -

DEFENDANTS? MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

3/23/2018: DEFENDANTS? MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

DECLARATION OF DANIEL A. REISMAN IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS FOR A 4EW TRIAL AND JUDGMENT 4OT WITHSTANDING THE VERDICT

4/23/2018: DECLARATION OF DANIEL A. REISMAN IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS FOR A 4EW TRIAL AND JUDGMENT 4OT WITHSTANDING THE VERDICT

APPELLANT'S NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL (UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE)

6/18/2018: APPELLANT'S NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL (UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE)

MEMORANDUM IN REPLY TO DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

9/24/2018: MEMORANDUM IN REPLY TO DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

Appellate Order Extending Time for Reporter Transcript Prep - Appellate Order Extending Time for Reporter Transcript Prep EXTENSION GRANTED FOR APPEAL FILED 6/6/18

11/13/2018: Appellate Order Extending Time for Reporter Transcript Prep - Appellate Order Extending Time for Reporter Transcript Prep EXTENSION GRANTED FOR APPEAL FILED 6/6/18

Appeal - Remittitur - Other - APPEAL - REMITTITUR - OTHER - AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED; REMANDED. B290505

8/17/2020: Appeal - Remittitur - Other - APPEAL - REMITTITUR - OTHER - AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED; REMANDED. B290505

Declaration - DECLARATION OF NORMAN PINE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

11/25/2020: Declaration - DECLARATION OF NORMAN PINE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

Notice of Ruling

2/26/2021: Notice of Ruling

ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

7/12/2016: ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

10/6/2016: NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT -

12/7/2016: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT -

NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT AND CROSS-COMPLAJNANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT

10/11/2017: NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT AND CROSS-COMPLAJNANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT

Minute Order -

10/16/2017: Minute Order -

NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL

11/1/2017: NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL

Minute Order -

11/14/2017: Minute Order -

Minute Order -

11/15/2017: Minute Order -

SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

11/17/2017: SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

117 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 04/27/2021
  • DocketNotice of Ruling (CORRECTED NOTICE OF RULING); Filed by Chris Curry (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/06/2021
  • DocketNotice of Ruling; Filed by Chris Curry (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 36, Gregory W. Alarcon, Presiding; Hearing on Motion for Attorney Fees (*cont'd from 02/25/21*) - Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • DocketCertificate of Mailing for ((Hearing on Motion for Attorney Fees *cont'd from 02/25/21*) of 03/25/2021); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • DocketOrder (granting in part mtn for atty fees on appeal); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • DocketMinute Order ( (Hearing on Motion for Attorney Fees *cont'd from 02/25/21*)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • DocketOrder Appointing Court Approved Reporter as Official Reporter Pro Tempore (as to Linda Lee, #13568)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2021
  • DocketObjection (to Declaration of Scott Tillett in Support of Plaintiff's Reply Re Motion for Attorney's Fees on Appeal); Filed by Academy Pointe, Inc (Defendant); Anza Management Company (Defendant); J.K. Residential Service, Inc. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2021
  • DocketSupplemental Declaration (of James P. Schratz in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees on Appeal); Filed by Academy Pointe, Inc (Defendant); Anza Management Company (Defendant); J.K. Residential Service, Inc. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2021
  • DocketOpposition ([Supplemental] to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees on Appeal); Filed by Academy Pointe, Inc (Defendant); Anza Management Company (Defendant); J.K. Residential Service, Inc. (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
216 More Docket Entries
  • 10/06/2016
  • DocketNOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/12/2016
  • DocketANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/12/2016
  • DocketAnswer; Filed by StateWide Enterprises, Inc GF SETTLMT (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/23/2016
  • DocketANSWER OF DEFENDANTS, ACADEMY POINTE, INC. AND ANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/23/2016
  • DocketAnswer; Filed by Academy Pointe, Inc (Defendant); Anza Management Company (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/02/2016
  • DocketProof of Service (not Summons and Complaint); Filed by Chris Curry (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/02/2016
  • DocketPROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/20/2016
  • DocketComplaint; Filed by Chris Curry (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/20/2016
  • DocketSUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/20/2016
  • DocketCOMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES FOR HOUSING AND PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION DISCRIMINATION

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC621282    Hearing Date: February 25, 2021    Dept: 36

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 36

CHRIS CURRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ACADEMY POINTE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: BC621282

Hearing Date: 2/25/2021

[TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Motion to Award Attorney’s Fees on Appeal

The motion is continued to 03/25/21 at 8:30 am.

Plaintiff is to file proof of service of the reply, declaration, and objections within five days.

Defendants are permitted to file a supplemental response limited to the supplemental evidence filed with the reply within ten days.

Notice; Reply Evidence

Plaintiff moves for an award of attorney’s fees on appeal and fees for this motion. (Mot. at pp. 2, 9.) Defendants oppose on grounds that Plaintiff is not a prevailing party, and alternatively, on grounds that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attorney’s fees requested, relying in primary part on the declaration of James P. Schratz and audit of the Plaintiff’s billing submitted with the Motion. (See generally Opp.) Plaintiff on reply offers the declaration of Scott Tillett, attacking the credibility and grounds of Mr. Schratz’s declaration, and attesting to additional hours for drafting the reply and reply declaration in this motion. (See generally Reply.)

The general rule of motion practice is that new evidence is not permitted with reply papers. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537.) When inclusion of such evidence is permitted, the other party should be given the opportunity to respond. (See id.)

Next, Plaintiff has failed to include a Proof of Service with his reply brief or evidence in support showing timely service thereof. (See CCP § 1005(b).)

Based on the foregoing, the motion is continued. Plaintiff is to file proof of service of the reply, declaration, and objections within five days. Defendants are permitted to file a supplemental response limited to the supplemental evidence filed with the reply within ten days.

Dated: ____________________________

Gregory Alarcon

Superior Court Judge

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where ACADEMY POINTE INC (DOE 1) is a litigant

Latest cases where ANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION is a litigant

Latest cases where STATEWIDE ENTERPRISES INC. is a litigant

Latest cases where J.K. RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC. is a litigant