This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 06/29/2019 at 00:01:05 (UTC).

CECELIA KLEINER VS RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY

Case Summary

On 12/01/2015 CECELIA KLEINER filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ****2681

  • Filing Date:

    12/01/2015

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Stanley Mosk Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

STEPHEN I. GOORVITCH

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs and Petitioners

KLEINER CECELIA

ROVEN JONATHAN D. ESQ.

Defendants and Respondents

DOES 1 THROUGH 50

RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Petitioner Attorneys

BIREN MATTHEW B.F. ESQ.

CHEONG DENOVE ROWELL & BENNETT

BERMAN MITCHELL EVAN

FACCONE JOSEPH JR. ESQ.

Defendant and Respondent Attorney

STONE GREGORY E. ESQ.

 

Court Documents

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

3/8/2018: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA; MOTION FOR COURT ORDER TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO PRODUCE MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS, OR IT THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR ISSUE EVIDENCE SANCTIONS

3/12/2018: MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA; MOTION FOR COURT ORDER TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO PRODUCE MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS, OR IT THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR ISSUE EVIDENCE SANCTIONS

Minute Order

3/13/2018: Minute Order

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AURHORITIES; DECLARATION OF JOSEPH FACCONE, JR.;[PROPOSED] ORDER

3/14/2018: EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AURHORITIES; DECLARATION OF JOSEPH FACCONE, JR.;[PROPOSED] ORDER

NOTICE OF RULING

3/16/2018: NOTICE OF RULING

Motion for Order

3/29/2018: Motion for Order

Reply

4/27/2018: Reply

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF GREGORY S. MILLER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

6/19/2018: SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF GREGORY S. MILLER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

Minute Order

4/12/2019: Minute Order

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

12/1/2015: COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Notice of Change of Address

4/1/2016: Notice of Change of Address

PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF LIEN

4/20/2016: PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF LIEN

CIVIL DEPOSIT

12/15/2016: CIVIL DEPOSIT

Minute Order

6/27/2017: Minute Order

ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

6/27/2017: ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

PROOF OF SERVICE OF ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

7/26/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE OF ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF JONATHAN ROVEN

8/9/2017: PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF JONATHAN ROVEN

NOTICE OF RULING ON EX PARTE TO CONTINUE TRIAL

11/30/2017: NOTICE OF RULING ON EX PARTE TO CONTINUE TRIAL

66 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/25/2019
  • at 1:30 PM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Hearing on Motion to Compel (Responses to Supplemental Interrogatories) - Held - Motion Granted

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/25/2019
  • Minute Order ( (Hearing on Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Interro...)); Filed by Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/18/2019
  • Reply (Reply and Notice of No Opposition Received to Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Interrogatories); Filed by Ralphs Grocery Company (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/05/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/22/2019
  • at 10:00 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Ex-Parte Proceedings - Not Held - Advanced and Vacated

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/22/2019
  • at 10:00 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/01/2019
  • Motion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery) - 1 moving party, 1 motion; Filed by Ralphs Grocery Company (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/01/2019
  • Motion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery) - 1 moving party, 1 motion; Filed by Ralphs Grocery Company (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/12/2019
  • at 08:30 AM in Department 5, Stephen I. Goorvitch, Presiding; Hearing on Ex Parte Application (For Stipulated Continuance of Trial) - Held - Motion Granted

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/12/2019
  • Ex Parte Application (For Stipulated Continuance of Trial); Filed by Cecelia Kleiner (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
159 More Docket Entries
  • 04/01/2016
  • Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information; Filed by Cecelia Kleiner (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/10/2016
  • Answer; Filed by Ralphs Grocery Company (Defendant)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/10/2016
  • DEFENDANT RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA RALPHS'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/04/2016
  • PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 02/04/2016
  • Proof-Service/Summons; Filed by Cecelia Kleiner (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/06/2016
  • Notice of Lien; Filed by Cecelia Kleiner (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/06/2016
  • NOTICE OF LIEN

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/01/2015
  • SUMMONS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/01/2015
  • Complaint; Filed by Cecelia Kleiner (Plaintiff); Jonathan D. Roven, Esq. (Plaintiff)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/01/2015
  • COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: BC602681    Hearing Date: February 18, 2020    Dept: 32

 

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 32

cecelia kleiner,

Plaintiff,

v.

ralphs grocery company,

Defendant.

Case No.: BC602681

Hearing Date: February 18, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

defendant’s request that the court hold nazarian zarneh in Contempt

Department #32 will be dark for motions on February 13, 2020.  Each party is ordered to email the Court’s clerk at SSCDept32@lacourt.org before 1:30 p.m. that day to inform the clerk whether you are submitting on the Court’s tentative or whether you are requesting a hearing.  If any party requests a hearing, one will be scheduled.  If you do not request a hearing or fail to email the Court’s clerk before 1:30 p.m. on the date of the hearing, you will waive the right to be heard and shall submit to this tentative order, which shall issue.

TENTATIVE ORDER

Defendant Ralphs Grocery Company (“Defendant”) seeks to hold a third-party witness, Nazarian Zarneh (“Deponent”), in contempt of court for failure to obey a deposition subpoena. Given the trial date of February 19, 2020, the last date for the Court to hear discovery motions was February 4, 2020. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.020, subd. (a).) Defendant has not demonstrated that Plaintiff Cecelia Kleiner stipulated in writing to the Court’s consideration of this untimely motion, as required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.060.) Nor has Defendant sought leave to bring an untimely motion regarding discovery. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.050, subd. (a).)

Moreover, Defendant has been dilatory in pursuing this discovery. This case was filed on December 1, 2015, meaning that discovery has been ongoing for approximately four years. In his declaration, Defendant’s counsel states that Deponent’s significance became clear only recently. Counsel states that he deposed a customer witness on December 4, 2019, and she testified that she reported the spill to Deponent, then an employee. However, Defendant’s counsel does not explain why it took four years to identify and depose this witness. Even if the witness was refusing to participate, there was ample time to compel her deposition.

Based upon the foregoing, Defendant’s motion to hold a third-party witness in contempt is denied. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: February 18, 2020 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court

Case Number: BC602681    Hearing Date: February 13, 2020    Dept: 32

 

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 32

cecelia kleiner,

Plaintiff,

v.

ralphs grocery company,

Defendant.

Case No.: BC602681

Hearing Date: February 13, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

defendant’s request that the court hold nazarian zarneh in Contempt

Department #32 will be dark for motions on February 13, 2020.  Each party is ordered to email the Court’s clerk at SSCDept32@lacourt.org before 1:30 p.m. that day to inform the clerk whether you are submitting on the Court’s tentative or whether you are requesting a hearing.  If any party requests a hearing, one will be scheduled.  If you do not request a hearing or fail to email the Court’s clerk before 1:30 p.m. on the date of the hearing, you will waive the right to be heard and shall submit to this tentative order, which shall issue.

TENTATIVE ORDER

Defendant Ralphs Grocery Company (“Defendant”) seeks to hold a third-party witness, Nazarian Zarneh (“Deponent”), in contempt of court for failure to obey a deposition subpoena. Given the trial date of February 19, 2020, the last date for the Court to hear discovery motions was February 4, 2020. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.020, subd. (a).) Defendant has not demonstrated that Plaintiff Cecelia Kleiner stipulated in writing to the Court’s consideration of this untimely motion, as required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.060.) Nor has Defendant sought leave to bring an untimely motion regarding discovery. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.050, subd. (a).)

Moreover, Defendant has been dilatory in pursuing this discovery. This case was filed on December 1, 2015, meaning that discovery has been ongoing for approximately four years. In his declaration, Defendant’s counsel states that Deponent’s significance became clear only recently. Counsel states that he deposed a customer witness on December 4, 2019, and she testified that she reported the spill to Deponent, then an employee. However, Defendant’s counsel does not explain why it took four years to identify and depose this witness. Even if the witness was refusing to participate, there was ample time to compel her deposition.

Based upon the foregoing, Defendant’s motion to hold a third-party witness in contempt is denied. Defendant shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.

DATED: February 13, 2020 ___________________________

Stephen I. Goorvitch

Judge of the Superior Court