On 01/06/2016 CALIFORNIA BUSINESS BUREAU INC filed a Contract - Debt Collection lawsuit against CARMEN E CANJURA. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Glendale Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is LAURA A. MATZ. The case status is Disposed - Judgment Entered.
****4535
01/06/2016
Disposed - Judgment Entered
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Glendale Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
LAURA A. MATZ
CALIFORNIA BUSINESS BUREAU INC
CANJURA CARMEN E.
MARQUEZ CARLOS
MARQUEZ CARLOS A.
LOVE FRANKLIN J.
Court documents are not available for this case.
Judgment Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Default Entered Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Statement of Case Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Declaration (IN SUPPORT OF ATTY FEES PER 1717.5 OF THE CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Request for Dismissal-Partial (WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, ONLY ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Request for Entry of Default Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Req for Entry of Court's Judgment (SUBMITTED/PROCESSED ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Proof-Service/Summons Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Proof-Service/Summons (PARTY SERVED; CARLOS MARQUEZ ) Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Summons Filed
Complaint filed-Summons Issued
Case Number: EC064535 Hearing Date: March 13, 2020 Dept: E
CLAIM OF EXEMPTION
(Enforcement of Judgment)
[CCP §703.520]
Date: 3/13/20
Case: California Business Bureau Inc. v. Carmen E. Canjura et al. (EC 064535)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Judgment debtor Carlos Marquez’s claim of exemption is DENIED.
Under CCP § 703.580(b), at a hearing on a claim of exemption, “the exemption claimant has the burden of proof.” In meeting this burden, the one who claims the exemption must establish the right by evidence or facts; an affidavit which merely follows the language of the statute and states nothing more than conclusions of law is insufficient. (Le Font v. Rankin (1959) 167 Cal.App.2d 433, 435.) Because judgment debtor Carlos Marquez did not provide any financial statement or statement of facts showing how his checking and savings accounts are exempt from enforcement of judgment, the claim of exemption is DENIED.