Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from Los Angeles County Superior Courts on 04/13/2021 at 04:23:32 (UTC).

INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ON BEHALF OF CITY OF POMONA VS CLAUDIA AGREDANO

Case Summary

On 11/17/2020 INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ON BEHALF OF CITY OF POMONA filed an Other lawsuit against CLAUDIA AGREDANO. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Spring Street Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is SERENA R. MURILLO. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    *******3811

  • Filing Date:

    11/17/2020

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other

  • Court:

    Los Angeles County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Spring Street Courthouse

  • County, State:

    Los Angeles, California

Judge Details

Judge

SERENA R. MURILLO

 

Party Details

Petitioner and Appellant

INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ON BEHALF OF CITY OF POMONA

Respondent

AGREDANO CLAUDIA

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Other Attorneys

HASSELL MICHELINA J.

 

Court Documents

Notice (name extension) - Notice of Continued Hearing on the Trial de Novo on Appeal

3/23/2021: Notice (name extension) - Notice of Continued Hearing on the Trial de Novo on Appeal

Minute Order - Minute Order (Hearing - Other Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...)

3/19/2021: Minute Order - Minute Order (Hearing - Other Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...)

Appeal - Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal - Appeal - Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal VACATING NOTICE OF FILING

3/8/2021: Appeal - Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal - Appeal - Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal VACATING NOTICE OF FILING

Appeal - Notice Vacating Notice of Default - Appeal - Notice Vacating Notice of Default

3/8/2021: Appeal - Notice Vacating Notice of Default - Appeal - Notice Vacating Notice of Default

Minute Order - Minute Order (Court Order Re: Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...)

3/5/2021: Minute Order - Minute Order (Court Order Re: Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...)

Certificate of Mailing for - Certificate of Mailing for (Court Order Re: Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...) of 03/05/2021

3/5/2021: Certificate of Mailing for - Certificate of Mailing for (Court Order Re: Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...) of 03/05/2021

Appeal - Notice of Default Issued - Appeal - Notice of Default Issued

2/26/2021: Appeal - Notice of Default Issued - Appeal - Notice of Default Issued

Declaration (name extension) - Declaration of Briana Marquez

12/22/2020: Declaration (name extension) - Declaration of Briana Marquez

Order (name extension) - Order [Proposed] Order Declaring Dogs Potentially Dangerous

1/5/2021: Order (name extension) - Order [Proposed] Order Declaring Dogs Potentially Dangerous

Appeal - Notice of Appeal/Cross Appeal Filed - Appeal - Notice of Appeal/Cross Appeal Filed

2/4/2021: Appeal - Notice of Appeal/Cross Appeal Filed - Appeal - Notice of Appeal/Cross Appeal Filed

Notice (name extension) - Notice of Entry of Order/Judgment on the City's Petition for Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines

2/9/2021: Notice (name extension) - Notice of Entry of Order/Judgment on the City's Petition for Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines

Certificate of Mailing for - Certificate of Mailing for (Hearing on Petition For Determination of Potentially Dangerou...) of 12/22/2020

12/22/2020: Certificate of Mailing for - Certificate of Mailing for (Hearing on Petition For Determination of Potentially Dangerou...) of 12/22/2020

Certificate of Mailing for - Certificate of Mailing for (Court Order Re: Hearing on Petition For Determination of Pote...) of 11/19/2020

11/19/2020: Certificate of Mailing for - Certificate of Mailing for (Court Order Re: Hearing on Petition For Determination of Pote...) of 11/19/2020

Minute Order - Minute Order (Court Order Re: Hearing on Petition For Determination of Pote...)

11/19/2020: Minute Order - Minute Order (Court Order Re: Hearing on Petition For Determination of Pote...)

Declaration (name extension) - Declaration of Animal Control Officer Daniel Pena in Support of Petition for Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines

11/17/2020: Declaration (name extension) - Declaration of Animal Control Officer Daniel Pena in Support of Petition for Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines

Declaration (name extension) - Declaration of John Hernandez

11/17/2020: Declaration (name extension) - Declaration of John Hernandez

Notice of Case Assignment - Limited Civil Case - Notice of Case Assignment - Limited Civil Case

11/17/2020: Notice of Case Assignment - Limited Civil Case - Notice of Case Assignment - Limited Civil Case

Notice of Hearing on Petition - Notice of Hearing on Petition

11/17/2020: Notice of Hearing on Petition - Notice of Hearing on Petition

16 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 05/07/2021
  • Hearing05/07/2021 at 10:30 AM in Department 25 at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Hearing - Other (name extension)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/23/2021
  • DocketNotice of Continued Hearing on the Trial de Novo on Appeal; Filed by: Inland Valley Humane Society on behalf of City of Pomona (Petitioner); As to: Claudia Agredano (Respondent)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/19/2021
  • DocketHearing - Other Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines scheduled for 05/07/2021 at 10:30 AM in Spring Street Courthouse at Department 25

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/19/2021
  • DocketMinute Order (Hearing - Other Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/19/2021
  • DocketOn the Court's own motion, Hearing - Other Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines scheduled for 03/19/2021 at 10:30 AM in Spring Street Courthouse at Department 25 Held - Continued was rescheduled to 05/07/2021 10:30 AM

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2021
  • DocketAppeal - Notice Vacating Notice of Default; Filed by: Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/08/2021
  • DocketAppeal - Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal VACATING NOTICE OF FILING; Filed by: Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/05/2021
  • DocketHearing - Other Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines scheduled for 03/19/2021 at 10:30 AM in Spring Street Courthouse at Department 25

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/05/2021
  • DocketMinute Order (Court Order Re: Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/05/2021
  • DocketCertificate of Mailing for (Court Order Re: Trial De Novo Re: Petition For Determination ...) of 03/05/2021; Filed by: Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
20 More Docket Entries
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketHearing on Petition For Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof scheduled for 03/23/2021 at 08:30 AM in Spring Street Courthouse at Department 26

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketCase assigned to Hon. Serena R. Murillo in Department 26 Spring Street Courthouse

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketNotice of Case Assignment - Limited Civil Case; Filed by: Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketNotice of Hearing on Petition; Filed by: Clerk

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketDeclaration of Animal Control Officer Daniel Pena in Support of Petition for Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines; Filed by: Inland Valley Humane Society on behalf of City of Pomona (Petitioner); As to: Claudia Agredano (Respondent)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketCivil Case Cover Sheet; Filed by: Inland Valley Humane Society on behalf of City of Pomona (Petitioner); As to: Claudia Agredano (Respondent)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketSummons on Petition; Issued and Filed by: Inland Valley Humane Society on behalf of City of Pomona (Petitioner); As to: Claudia Agredano (Respondent)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketDeclaration of John Hernandez; Filed by: Inland Valley Humane Society on behalf of City of Pomona (Petitioner); As to: Claudia Agredano (Respondent)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketDeclaration of Jannet Ibarra; Filed by: Inland Valley Humane Society on behalf of City of Pomona (Petitioner); As to: Claudia Agredano (Respondent)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/17/2020
  • DocketPetition For Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs and Imposition of Fines; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; Filed by: Inland Valley Humane Society on behalf of City of Pomona (Petitioner); As to: Claudia Agredano (Respondent)

    Read MoreRead Less

Tentative Rulings

Case Number: 20STCP03811    Hearing Date: March 19, 2021    Dept: 25

HEARING DATE: Fri., March 19, 2021 JUDGE /DEPT: Blancarte/25

CASE NAME: Inland Valley Humane Society v. Agredano PET. FILED: 11-17-20

CASE NUMBER: 20STCP03811 HEARING: 12-22-20

NOTICE: OK

PROCEEDINGS: PETITION FOR DETERMINATION OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS AND IMPOSITION OF FINES

MOVING PARTY: Petitioner Inland Valley Humane Society

RESP. PARTY: Respondent Claudia Agredano

PETITION TO DETERMINE IF DOG IS POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS

(Food & Agric. Code § 31602)

TENTATIVE RULING:

Because it is untimely under Food & Agricultural Section Code section 31622, subdivision (a), Petitioner Inland Valley Humane Society’s appeal of the Court’s December 22, 2020 order is DENIED.

SERVICE:

[X] Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule 3.1300) OK

[X] Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013a) OK

[X] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP §§ 12c, 1005(b)) OK

OPPOSITION: Filed on December 22, 2020 [X] Late [ ] None

REPLY: None filed as of March 17, 2021 [ ] Late [X] None

ANALYSIS:

  1. Background

Petitioner Inland Valley Humane Society (“Petitioner”) filed the instant Petition for Determination of Potentially Dangerous Dogs (the “Petition”) against Respondent Claudia Agredano (“Respondent”). The Petition sought to declare two adult Pitbulls, Kaitlin and Corn Dog (the “Dogs”), potentially dangerous as defined by Food and Agricultural Code section 31602, subdivision (b). (Pet., p. 2:3-8.)

An initial hearing on the Petition took place on December 22, 2020 before the Hon. Edward Simpson in Department 26. (12/20/20 Minute Order.) Following oral argument from the parties, the Court took the matter under submission. (Id.)

Later that day, having fully considered the arguments and evidence of the parties, the Court found Caitlyn [sic] and Corndawg [sic] potentially dangerous as defined by Food and Agricultural Code section 31602, subdivision (b). (Id.) The dogs were ordered to be kept indoors or in the rear yard in a secure fence not less than six (6) feet high from which the Dogs could not escape and when off the owner’s premises, restrained by a leash no longer than six (6) feet. (Id.) The Court also ordered the Dogs to be properly licensed and vaccinated. (Id.) The Court declined to issue any requirements for liability insurance, veterinary care, or investigation charges because Petitioner did not provide any legal authority for these requests. (Id.)

As for charges, the Court noted that Section 31625 provides for seizure and impoundment of dogs pending a hearing, which is required to take place no earlier than five (5) days or later than ten (10) days after service of notice on the owner. (Id.) Section 31625 also provides for liability of the owner of the dogs for the costs and expenses of keeping the dogs. (Id.) However, because the December 22 hearing took place in excess of the ten-day limitation, the Court only awarded Petitioner costs for ten days of keeping the dogs, totaling $100.00. (Id.) Petitioner was ordered to file a proposed order within twenty (20) days. (Id.)

Petitioner filed the proposed order on January 5, 2021 in accordance with the December 22, 2020 decision. The Hon. Serena Murillo in Department 26 signed the order on January 14, 2021.

Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal on February 4, 2021.

  1. Legal Standard & Discussion

Food & Agricultural Code section 31622, subdivision (a), provides:

“(a) After the hearing conducted pursuant to Section 31621, the owner or keeper of the dog shall be notified in writing of the determination and orders issued, either personally or by first-class mail postage prepaid by the court or hearing entity. If a determination is made that the dog is potentially dangerous or vicious, the owner or keeper of the dog shall comply with Article 3 (commencing with Section 31641) in accordance with a time schedule established by the chief officer of the public animal shelter or animal control department or the head of the local law enforcement agency, but in no case more than 30 days after the date of the determination or 35 days if notice of the determination is mailed to the owner or keeper of the dog. If the petitioner or the owner or keeper of the dog contests the determination, they may, within five days of the receipt of the notice of determination, appeal the decision of the court or hearing entity of original jurisdiction.”

(Emphasis added.)

The court hearing the appeal shall conduct a hearing de novo and make its own determination as to the potential dangerousness or viciousness of the dog and may make other orders as authorized by this chapter. (Food & Agric. Code § 31622, subd. (b).)

As an initial matter, the Court finds Petitioner’s appeal is untimely. As noted above, the Court issued its decision on the Petition on December 22, 2020 and the Department 26 clerk mailed a copy of the order to Petitioner and Respondent. (12/22/20 Certificate of Mailing.) Because Petitioner filed a proposed judgment in accordance with the December 22, 2020 order on January 5, 2021, Petitioner had notice of the Court’s determination the latest on January 5, 2021. Petitioner did not file an appeal with five (5) days of receiving notice of the Court’s determination as required by Food and Agricultural section 31622, subdivision (a); rather Petitioner waited at least thirty (30) days before filing this appeal.

Because Petitioner’s appeal is untimely, the appeal is DENIED.

  1. Conclusion & Order

Because it is untimely under Food & Agricultural Section Code section 31622, subdivision (a), Petitioner Inland Valley Humane Society’s appeal of the Court’s December 22, 2020 order is DENIED.

Moving party is ordered to give notice.

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer HASSELL MICHELINA J.