DUENAS ET AL VS CENTEX HOMES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Case Summary
On 08/27/2015 DUENAS filed a Property - Construction Defect lawsuit against CENTEX HOMES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts, Metropolitan Branch located in Kern, California. The Judges overseeing this case are Chapin, Sidney P., Clark, Thomas S., Etienne, Linda S., Schuett, Stephen D. and Lampe, David R.. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
*********0852
-
Filing Date:
08/27/2015
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
Judge Details
Judges
Chapin, Sidney P.
Clark, Thomas S.
Etienne, Linda S.
Schuett, Stephen D.
Lampe, David R.
Party Details
Plaintiffs
RAMIREZ, BLANCA
ELIZALDE, MARIA SILVIA
NICHOLAS, ANN
ACEVEZ, SR, FELIZ
DUENAS, ABEL
DAVID, RICHARD
ESTRADA, ROSELIA GUZMAN
GARICA, MARK
HILL, NAOMI
MORA, JOSE RAMIREZ
RODRIGUEZ, CRISTAL
BOREN, MARIYA
BOREN, CLIFFORD
HILL, RICHARD
HUANG, JAMES
GARICA, GENA
MENG, LILI
MONTOYA, HECTOR
ELIZALDE, JESUS
Defendant
CENTEX HOMES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorney
EDWARDS, LUCAS A
Defendant Attorney
SCHLICHTING, JOHN K
Other Attorneys
CABRAL, CARLOS C
SCANLON, TIMOTHY G
PEZOLD, DANIEL G
MCNEILL, TIMOTHY C
TERCERO, NAPOLEON G, III
MILIONIS, GEORGE K
VAIRETTA, WENDI NICOLE
GUTHRIE, LORI J
PARKER, JAMES C
CRAWFORD, DAVID
LEGASPI, CATHERINE LAGMAN
GONZALEZ, SCOTT M
RAMIA, SEAN A
MURPHY, JASON M
HAMMONS, WALLACE W
KIRKPATRICK, CHERYL A
AU, PATRICK
LUHRING, SUSAN E
Court Documents
Rejection/Correction Notice: Comment: RE: CHECK IN THE AMT OF $1000 RETURNED VIA USPS
Rejection/Correction Notice: Comment: DEMAND FOR JURY AND POSTING JURY FEES. JURY FEES ARE MISSING.
Rejection/Correction Notice: Comment: DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL & POSTING JURY FEES. JURY FEES ARE MISSING.
Rejection/Correction Notice: Comment: To: Napoleon G. Tercero III Document: Notice of Association of Counsel Check #183883 for $1435.00 made from DDS Legal Support Systems, Inc. not needed. Fees previously paid.
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: ANSWER/ CROSS-COMPLAINT/ SUMMONS & NOTICE OF POSTING JURY FEES. MISSING COMPLEX FEES OF $1,000.00
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT, ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINTAND NOTICE OF POSTING JURY FEES. AN ANSWER WAS PREVIOUSLY FILED FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT BY HUGO PARKER, LLP ON 10/26/17. NO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED. SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY IS REQUIRED.
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: CROSS COMPLAINT. PROOF OF SERVICE MUST BE ATTACHED IF SUBMITTING SEPARATE IT MUST HAVE A PROPER FACE PAGE.
Rejection/Correction Notice: Comment: CROSS COMPLAINT MISSING POS.
Minute order 11/19/2015: Hearing Time: 8:00 AM; Result: Ruling
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: RE: GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT (DUPLICATE) RETURNED VIA E-FILE
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: RE: APPLICATION FOR GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT RETURNED VIA E-FILE
Motion for Leave 04/20/2018: Judicial Officer: Schuett, Stephen D.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Held; Comment: 3/20/18 Cross-Defendanta and Cross-Complainant, CASKEY CORPORATION DBA CENTURY GLASS Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint ResID: 29445
Rejection/Correction Notice: Comment: RE: COMPLEX FEE NOTICE RETURNED VIA SASE
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: ANSWER. REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL FILED ON 9/29/17
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT.
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT. FIRST APPEARANCE FEES AND COMPLEX CASE FEES ARE DUE AT THE TIME OF FILING.
Case Management Conference 09/21/2017: Judicial Officer: Chapin, Sidney P.; Hearing Time: 8:00 AM; Result: Held; Parties Present Defendant; Attorney: SCHLICHTING, JOHN K; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Plaintiff; Attorney: GUTHRIE, LORI J; Cross Complainant; Attorney: SCHLICHTING, JOHN K
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: PROOF OF SERVICE. CANNOT FILE A REJECTION ISSUED BY THE COURT.
Docket Entries
- 09/06/2017
-
Cause of Action: Cross-Complaint; Type: Cross Action
- 11/09/2017
-
Cause of Action: Cross-Complaint; Type: Cross Action
- 04/27/2018
-
Cause of Action: Cross-Complaint; Type: Cross Action; Filed By: 12759; Filed Against: 12759
- 07/03/2019
-
Diposition: Judgment - Judicial Officer: Schuett, Stephen D.; Judgment Type: Dismissal-Entry of Request for Dismissal-Before Trial(CL/CV)
- 09/26/2019
-
Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal - Judicial Officer: Schuett, Stephen D.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Comment: CRC 3.1385 Finalization of settlement (COMPLAINT ONLY)
- 09/19/2019
-
Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal - Judicial Officer: Schuett, Stephen D.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Comment: why matter should not be dismissed pursuant to CRC 3.1385 (CROSS COMPLAINT ONLY)
- 09/09/2019
-
Jury Trial - Judicial Officer: Schuett, Stephen D.; Hearing Time: 9:00 AM; Cancel Reason: Notice of Settlement Filed; Comment: T/E: unk.
- 08/30/2019
-
Final Case Management Conference - Judicial Officer: Schuett, Stephen D.; Hearing Time: 01:30 PM; Cancel Reason: Notice of Settlement Filed; Comment: Jury Trial 09/09/19;
- 08/12/2019
-
Mail Returned Undelivered - Comment: Notice of Settlement Ruling dated 8/6/19
- 08/09/2019
-
Request for Dismissal (Partial) - Comment: as to XDeft's Prime Plumbing, Inc; Oran D. Tompkins dba TNT Drywall; Rosedale Ceramic Tile & Marble and Estate Landscaping - With Prejudice - Returned via E-File
- 12/11/2015
-
Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 - Judicial Officer: Chapin, Sidney P.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Cancel Reason: Proof Of Service Filed
- 11/19/2015
- View Court Documents
-
Ruling - Minute order 11/19/2015: Hearing Time: 8:00 AM; Result: Ruling
- 11/10/2015
-
Stipulation and Order - Judicial Officer: Chapin, Sidney P.; Comment: To stay action and app proceedings pending plaintiffs' compliance with civil code section 895 ET SEQ.
- 09/29/2015
-
Proof of Service - Summons / Complaint - Comment: As to Centex Homes, A Californian Corporation personal service 9/23/15
- 09/16/2015
-
Summons Issued and Filed - Comment: RETURNED VIA ACTIVE LEGAL
- 08/28/2015
-
Civil and Small Claims Documents
- 08/28/2015
-
Notice of Insufficient Filing Fees - Comment: RETURNED VIA ACTIVE LEGAL
- 08/28/2015
-
Order to Show Cause - Comment: Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 12/11/15 Hearing Time: 830 am Hearing Department/Division: 4
- 08/27/2015
-
Civil Case Cover Sheet (CM-010)
- 08/27/2015
-
Complaint - Comment: FILED BY LUCAS A. EDWARDS, ESQ CMC 2/24/16 @ 8AM D4
Complaint Information
Brian C. Chien (No. 213858)
Wendi N. Vairetta (No. 250099) KENYON CONSTRUCTION, INC. LI:GAL SERVICES DIVISION 525 Green Street, Suitc A
Martincz, CA 945353
Tel: (510) 741-8182
Fax: (510) 741-7874 bchien@kenyonweb.com
wvairctta/@kenvonweb.com
Attorneys tor Third-Party Defendant KENYON PLASTERING, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATLE Ol CALII'ORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
ABEL DUENAS, et al, ) Case No.: 9000022 ) Plaintiffs, ) KENYON PLLASTERING, INC.’S SPECIAL
) ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS® FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
CENTEX HOMES, a Ncevada General
Partncrship, and DOES 1-500), inclusive, Action Filed: August 27, 2015
T'rial Date: TBD Defendants.
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS
N’e’
Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedurc §428.70, Third-Party Defendant KENYON PLASTERING, INC. (“Third-Party Dcfendant™) in Answer to the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs on file herein, asscrts the following defenses, which Third-Party Plaintiff CENTEX HOMES (“Third-Party Plaintiff”) has, but may fail and neglect to asscrt, or has failed and necglected to assert, as follows:
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases